Skip to content

tangent_type(primal_type) #634

@oxinabox

Description

@oxinabox

Our life would be easier if we had a single canonical tangent type for any given primal type.
Wouldn't need to worry about having both natural and structural tangents needing to be supported.
Could require that a mapping (possibly via convert) from various forms to the single specified type was given.

Potentially this could be done in a nonbreaking way if it was required to use it, just preferred

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Structural TangentRelated to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) valuesbreakinga breaking changespeculativefairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions