diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/comprehensive-master-blueprint.json b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/comprehensive-master-blueprint.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b3d670a --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/data/comprehensive-master-blueprint.json @@ -0,0 +1,3391 @@ +{ + "docRef": "COMPREHENSIVE-MASTER-BLUEPRINT-WP-057", + "title": "Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational AGI/ASI Governance, Architecture, Safety & Implementation Master Blueprint", + "version": "1.0.0", + "status": "BOARD-APPROVED / REGULATOR-SUBMISSION-READY / MASTER-CONSOLIDATED", + "classification": "RESTRICTED // GOVERNANCE / SAFETY-CRITICAL / SYSTEMIC", + "generatedAt": "2026-05-22T11:16:45.166512Z", + "horizon": "2026-2030+ (Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs)", + "apiPrefix": "/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint", + "buildsOn": [ + "WP-035", + "WP-036", + "WP-037", + "WP-038", + "WP-039", + "WP-040", + "WP-041", + "WP-042", + "WP-043", + "WP-044", + "WP-045", + "WP-046", + "WP-047", + "WP-048", + "WP-049", + "WP-050", + "WP-051", + "WP-052", + "WP-053", + "WP-054", + "WP-055", + "WP-056" + ], + "audience": { + "primary": "Board of Directors, CEO, CAIO, CRO, CISO, CCO, Heads of Model Risk, Lead Supervisors", + "secondary": "External Auditors, Regulators (EU AI Office, Fed, SEC, MAS, HKMA, PRA, FCA, OSFI, FINMA), G7/UN AI bodies", + "tertiary": "Internal Audit, Group Risk Committee, Group Audit Committee, IMF/BIS/central banks" + }, + "owners": { + "executiveSponsor": "Group CEO + Board AI Risk Committee Chair", + "accountable": "Chief AI Officer (CAIO) + Chief Risk Officer (CRO)", + "responsible": "Sentinel Program Director, Head of WorkflowAI Pro, Head of MLSecOps, Head of AI Compliance, Head of Model Risk", + "consulted": "CISO, CFO, GC, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Data Officer, Head of Internal Audit", + "informed": "Board of Directors, Group Risk Committee, Group Audit Committee, External Auditors, Lead Supervisors, IMF/BIS Liaisons" + }, + "regimes": [ + "EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) — full applicability from 2 Aug 2026", + "EU AI Act GPAI obligations (Arts. 53 + 55) — systemic-risk model regime (10^25 FLOP threshold)", + "NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (Jan 2023)", + "NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile (Jul 2024)", + "ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System (AIMS, certifiable)", + "ISO/IEC 23894:2023 — AI Risk Management Guidance", + "ISO/IEC 27001 / 27701 — Information Security & Privacy Management", + "OECD AI Principles (updated 2024) — 5 values-based + 5 policy recommendations", + "GDPR (Reg. (EU) 2016/679) + UK GDPR — data protection, Art. 22 automated decisions", + "FCRA (15 USC 1681) + ECOA Reg B (12 CFR 1002) — fair lending + adverse action", + "Federal Reserve SR 11-7 + OCC 2011-12 — Model Risk Management", + "Basel III/IV — capital adequacy, ICAAP/ILAAP, operational risk for AI-driven activities", + "EU DORA (Reg. (EU) 2022/2554) — ICT operational resilience, major-incident notice ≤4h", + "EU NIS2 Directive (Dir. (EU) 2022/2555) — cyber resilience for essential entities", + "MiFID II / MAR — investment services, market abuse, algorithmic trading", + "SEC 17 CFR 240.17a-4 — WORM books and records (3y + 7y retention)", + "SEC 10-K Item 1A + Form 8-K Item 1.05 — AI risk disclosures + material incidents", + "FINRA Rules 3110 / 3120 / 4511 — supervision and recordkeeping", + "MAS FEAT — Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, Transparency (Singapore)", + "OSFI Guideline E-23 — Enterprise Model Risk Management (Canada)", + "PRA SS1/23 + FCA AI Discussion Paper — UK model risk + AI fairness", + "HKMA GP-1 + GS-2 — AI/ML risk governance (Hong Kong)", + "FINMA AI guidance — Swiss banking AI risk", + "G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct (Dec 2023)", + "Bletchley Declaration (Nov 2023) + Seoul Declaration (May 2024) + Paris AI Action Summit (Feb 2025)", + "UN AI Advisory Body recommendations + UN General Assembly AI Resolution", + "GASRGP — Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol (proposed treaty-grade)", + "GASC — Global AI Safety Council (proposed multilateral body)", + "GAISM — Global AI Safety Mesh (proposed planetary supervisory layer)" + ], + "directive": { + "purpose": "Provide a single comprehensive 2026-2030 master blueprint that synthesizes all prior workpackages (WP-035..WP-056) into one regulator-submission-grade artifact covering enterprise + civilizational AGI/ASI governance, Sentinel v2.4 + WorkflowAI Pro reference architectures, full regulatory compliance, frontier safety + containment, financial-services model risk + systemic-risk controls, civilizational governance stacks + treaty-level mechanisms, and phased dependency-aware implementation + research roadmap.", + "scopeIn": [ + "Sentinel AI v2.4 reference architecture (OPA Governance-as-Code, Kafka WORM, T0-T4 containment, Cognitive Resonance, Terraform/K8s, SOC, IR)", + "WorkflowAI Pro reference architecture (Yjs CRDT, Firestore versioning, RBAC, judge-LLM, swarm tracing, Markdown/PDF reporting)", + "Regulatory compliance: EU AI Act 2026 (incl. Arts. 53/55 GPAI systemic-risk), NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO 42001, OECD AI Principles, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2 — full clause mapping", + "Institutional AI governance: Board AI Risk Committee, CAIO/CRO/CISO/CCO operating model, three-lines-of-defense, charter + risk appetite", + "Frontier AGI/ASI safety: containment T0-T4, Cognitive Resonance latent drift, mesa-optimizer detection, deceptive alignment probes, adversary workbench, 3-of-5 quorum + kinetic override", + "Financial-services model risk + systemic risk: SR 11-7 independent validation, effective challenge, ICAAP/ILAAP integration, AI-driven trading + credit + AML controls, FRIA, EU AI Office filings", + "Civilizational stacks: CEGL (Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer), LexAI-DSL + FV-LexAI formal verification, GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty layers, Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer, central bank/IMF integration, civilizational corpus", + "Implementation + research roadmap: P0 Foundation → P4 Civilizational Frontier with dependencies, critical-path, exit gates, board-level milestones, budget envelopes", + "Regulator-submission-grade blueprints + artifacts: machine-parsable directives (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL), Kafka WORM annexes, OPA policy bundles, Terraform modules, explainability schemas, cross-jurisdictional traceability, Supervisory Submission Pack, planetary Supervisory Mesh" + ], + "scopeOut": [ + "Sector-specific applications beyond financial services (handled in vertical workpackages)", + "Pre-2026 legacy AI retirement (WP-040)", + "Non-AI vendor due diligence (separate vendor risk program)" + ], + "primaryOutcomes": [ + "Single board-approved + regulator-ready master blueprint covering all 5 dimensions (architecture / compliance / safety / financial-services / civilizational)", + "USD 150-450M / 5y G-SIFI investment envelope with NPV USD 450-1400M", + "All 28 regulatory regimes mapped + cross-jurisdictional traceability", + "Frontier AGI tier (T4) operational with 3-of-5 quorum + kinetic override; CSI ≥0.95", + "DRI ≥0.95 / CCS ≥0.95 / ARI ≥0.9 frontier / CGI ≥0.75 by 2030", + "GASRGP treaty pilot ≥7 signatories; GAISM mesh live; civilizational annual report" + ], + "policyAnchors": [ + "EU AI Act Arts. 9/15/16/27/53/55 — risk management, accuracy, robustness, FRIA, GPAI", + "NIST AI RMF 1.0 — Govern / Map / Measure / Manage", + "NIST AI 600-1 — Generative AI Profile with 200+ actions", + "ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS — Clauses 4-10 (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement)", + "OECD AI Principles — Inclusive growth, human-centred values, transparency, robustness, accountability", + "GDPR Arts. 22 + 35 (DPIA) + 44+ (cross-border) + 17 (RTBF)", + "FCRA 615 + ECOA Reg B — adverse action + non-discrimination", + "SR 11-7 — independent validation + effective challenge + ongoing monitoring", + "Basel III/IV — Pillar 1/2/3 with AI-driven activity capital and ICAAP integration", + "DORA Arts. 5-15 (ICT governance) + Art. 19 (major-incident notice)", + "NIS2 Art. 21 — cybersecurity risk-management measures" + ] + }, + "indices": { + "DRI": { + "name": "Drift Resilience Index", + "target2030": 0.95, + "definition": "1 - (latent_drift_severity × time-to-detect / SLO)" + }, + "CCS": { + "name": "Containment Confidence Score", + "target": 0.95, + "definition": "Validated containment success across red-team + adversary workbench scenarios" + }, + "ARI": { + "name": "Adversarial Robustness Index", + "target_frontier": 0.9, + "definition": "Robustness across prompt injection, jailbreak, data exfil, swarm collusion" + }, + "CSI": { + "name": "Containment Strength Index", + "target_T3T4": 0.95, + "definition": "Composite of isolation, kinetic override readiness, quorum integrity" + }, + "CGI": { + "name": "Civilizational Governance Index", + "target2030": 0.75, + "definition": "Composite of treaty adoption, mesh telemetry coverage, trust index uptake" + }, + "MRGI": { + "name": "Model Risk Governance Index", + "target": 0.95, + "definition": "SR 11-7 compliance composite (validation coverage, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring)" + }, + "RCI": { + "name": "Regulatory Coverage Index", + "target": 1.0, + "definition": "Fraction of applicable regime clauses mapped + evidenced" + } + }, + "tiers": { + "T0": "Sandbox — ephemeral, no production data, free experimentation", + "T1": "Staging — synthetic + masked data, full telemetry", + "T2": "Canary — limited production exposure (≤1%), kill-switch armed, auto-rollback", + "T3": "Production Nitro Enclaves — confidential compute, full WORM, CAIO+CRO approval", + "T4": "Frontier Air-Gapped — 3-of-5 quorum (CAIO+CRO+CISO+Board+Reg), kinetic override, GAISM linkage" + }, + "severities": { + "SEV-0": "Civilizational / systemic — EU AI Office notice ≤15d; CEO + Board immediate; potential GAISM escalation", + "SEV-1": "Major institutional — SEC ≤4 BD (Item 1.05); DORA ≤4h; CRO + CAIO; PRA/MAS/HKMA per regime", + "SEV-2": "Material model — internal IR + supervisor courtesy notice ≤72h", + "SEV-3": "Operational — internal ticket, RCA within 10 BD" + }, + "investmentEnvelope": { + "G-SIFI": "USD 150-450M / 5y", + "Global-2000": "USD 60-180M / 5y", + "Fortune-500": "USD 30-90M / 5y", + "NPV_G-SIFI": "USD 450-1400M", + "breakdown": { + "Phase-0": "10%", + "Phase-1": "30%", + "Phase-2": "30%", + "Phase-3": "20%", + "Phase-4": "10%" + } + }, + "modules": [ + { + "mid": "M1", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 Enterprise Reference Architecture", + "summary": "Master reference architecture for Sentinel v2.4: OPA Governance-as-Code, Kafka WORM, T0-T4 containment, Cognitive Resonance, Terraform/K8s infrastructure, SOC + SEV-class IR.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M1", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Control Plane in Nitro Enclaves + KMS", + "components": [ + "Sentinel orchestrator (Go microservices)", + "KMS envelope encryption", + "Vault-backed secrets", + "HSM-backed quorum service" + ], + "telemetry": [ + "OpenTelemetry traces + metrics + logs", + "Per-decision audit to Kafka WORM", + "GAISM mesh feed" + ], + "scaling": [ + "Horizontal pod autoscaler", + "Multi-region active-passive (RPO 5m / RTO 60m)", + "Quarterly DR drill" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M1", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Kafka WORM Audit Ledger (SEC 17a-4)", + "topics": [ + "sentinel.audit.governance", + "sentinel.audit.containment", + "sentinel.audit.drift", + "sentinel.audit.incident", + "sentinel.audit.workflowai", + "sentinel.audit.opa", + "sentinel.audit.rag" + ], + "controls": [ + "S3 Object Lock compliance mode 7y", + "Tamper-evident Merkle chain (hourly to Glacier vault lock)", + "Read-only auditor consumer groups", + "Cryptographic batch attestation" + ], + "attestation": "External SOC 2 Type II + SEC 17a-4 annual" + }, + { + "mid": "M1", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "T0-T4 Containment with 3-of-5 Quorum + Kinetic Override", + "isolation": [ + "T0 ephemeral pods", + "T1 staging masked", + "T2 canary ≤1%", + "T3 Nitro Enclaves", + "T4 air-gapped" + ], + "quorum": "HSM-backed multi-party 3-of-5 (CAIO+CRO+CISO+Board+Reg) for T3→T4 + kinetic override", + "kineticOverride": [ + "≤5min activation", + "Network kill + compute halt", + "Forensic snapshot", + "Civilizational SEV-0 notice ≤15d" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M1", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Cognitive Resonance Latent Drift Monitor", + "probes": [ + "Embedding centroid drift", + "Output entropy delta", + "Tool-call distribution KL", + "Refusal-rate Δ", + "Self-reference frequency", + "Adversarial-signature match" + ], + "alerting": [ + "Yellow 2σ → SOC", + "Orange 3σ → CAIO", + "Red 4σ → SEV-1 auto-trigger" + ], + "targets": { + "DRI": 0.95, + "p99_detect_to_alert_seconds": 60 + } + }, + { + "mid": "M1", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Terraform / K8s + SOC + SEV-Class IR", + "terraform": [ + "modules/sentinel-control-plane", + "modules/kafka-worm", + "modules/opa-distribution", + "modules/agi-tier-isolation", + "modules/quorum-hsm" + ], + "soc": [ + "Splunk ES + Datadog SIEM", + "Jira SOC queue with SEV routing", + "PagerDuty escalation", + "SOAR playbooks" + ], + "ir": [ + "IR-001 Prompt injection", + "IR-002 Data exfil", + "IR-003 Swarm collusion", + "IR-004 Kinetic override (SEV-0)", + "IR-005 Supply-chain compromise" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "title": "WorkflowAI Pro Reference Architecture", + "summary": "Master reference architecture for WorkflowAI Pro: Yjs CRDT, Firestore versioning, RBAC + ABAC, MLflow registry, OpenTelemetry swarm tracing, judge-LLM evaluation, accessibility.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M2", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Collaborative Prompt Authoring + Variable Linking", + "features": [ + "Yjs CRDT real-time co-edit", + "Variable DAG across prompts", + "Inline AI suggest with judge-LLM scoring", + "Comment threads with @mentions" + ], + "ux": "Tailwind + shadcn/ui; WCAG 2.2 AA; keyboard-first; screen-reader landmarks" + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Firestore Semantic Versioning + Testing + A/B", + "versioning": [ + "major.minor.patch + meta", + "Immutable snapshots", + "Diff view + revert", + "Export to S3 WORM" + ], + "testing": [ + "Golden cases", + "Adversarial cases (PyRIT/HarmBench/GCG)", + "Fairness cases (HELM-style)", + "Judge-LLM consensus (Claude+GPT ≥4/5)" + ], + "promotion": [ + "Canary A/B stat-sig", + "T2→T3 gate", + "≥95% golden pass + 0 fairness regressions" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "RBAC + ABAC + API Key Vault", + "rbac": [ + "Viewer/Author/Reviewer/Approver/Admin/Auditor" + ], + "abac": [ + "Domain (finance/legal/HR)", + "Tier (T0-T4)", + "Region (EU/US/APAC)" + ], + "apiKeys": [ + "Per-tenant + per-env isolation", + "Rotation ≤90d", + "Vault + KMS envelope", + "Never logged" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Model Registry Integration + Audit + Swarm Tracing", + "registry": "MLflow + custom adapter; model card linking; deprecation cascade", + "audit": [ + "All edits/runs → Kafka WORM (sentinel.audit.workflowai)", + "Retention 7y SEC / 10y EU GPAI" + ], + "tracing": "OpenTelemetry + W3C Trace Context; per-agent span; Jaeger + Datadog APM; force-directed swarm viz; collusion detection" + }, + { + "mid": "M2", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Reporting + Onboarding + Accessibility", + "reporting": [ + "Tailwind Prose + KaTeX + Mermaid", + "Markdown → HTML → headless Chrome PDF", + "PAdES-B-LTA signed PDFs", + "Firestore versioned snapshots" + ], + "onboarding": [ + "Shepherd.js guided tour", + "Role-based homepage", + "In-product docs", + "Sandbox prompts" + ], + "a11y": [ + "WCAG 2.2 AA", + "Keyboard-first", + "Screen-reader landmarks", + "High-contrast theme" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "title": "Regulatory Compliance Mapping (28 regimes, end-to-end clause coverage)", + "summary": "Full clause-level mapping of EU AI Act 2026, NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO 42001, OECD, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, DORA, NIS2 across Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M3", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "EU AI Act 2026 — Full Applicability + GPAI Systemic-Risk", + "applicability": "2 Aug 2026 full applicability", + "keyArticles": [ + "Art. 6 — high-risk classification", + "Art. 9 — risk management system", + "Art. 10 — data + data governance", + "Art. 13 — transparency + provision of information", + "Art. 15 — accuracy + robustness + cybersecurity", + "Art. 16 — provider obligations", + "Art. 26 — deployer obligations", + "Art. 27 — FRIA (Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment)", + "Art. 53 — GPAI obligations", + "Art. 55 — GPAI with systemic risk (>10^25 FLOP)" + ], + "controls": [ + "Risk management lifecycle", + "Data governance + bias mitigation", + "Technical documentation Annex IV", + "Human oversight", + "Post-market monitoring", + "Serious incident reporting ≤15d", + "FRIA for deployers of Annex III" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1 GenAI Profile", + "rmf": [ + "Govern (1.1-1.7)", + "Map (1.1-5.2)", + "Measure (1.1-4.3)", + "Manage (1.1-4.3)" + ], + "ai600_1": [ + "200+ actions specific to GenAI risks", + "CBRN/dual-use", + "Hallucination/confabulation", + "Data privacy", + "Information security", + "Human-AI configuration", + "Value chain" + ], + "integration": "Mapped 1:1 to Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls; per-action evidence pointers in Kafka WORM" + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS + ISO/IEC 23894 Risk + ISO/IEC 27001/27701", + "iso42001Clauses": [ + "Clause 4 Context", + "Clause 5 Leadership", + "Clause 6 Planning", + "Clause 7 Support", + "Clause 8 Operation", + "Clause 9 Evaluation", + "Clause 10 Improvement" + ], + "certification": "Stage 2 audit by Q4-2027; surveillance audits annual; recertification every 3y", + "integration": "ISO 42001 AIMS implemented within Sentinel governance plane; 27001 ISMS aligned; 27701 PIMS for GDPR" + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Financial-Services Stack — Basel III/IV + SR 11-7 + DORA + NIS2", + "baseliii": [ + "Pillar 1 capital adequacy + AI-activity RWA", + "Pillar 2 ICAAP/ILAAP with AI model risk", + "Pillar 3 disclosures + AI risk transparency" + ], + "sr117": [ + "Independent validation", + "Effective challenge", + "Ongoing monitoring", + "Model inventory + tiering", + "Documentation standards" + ], + "dora": [ + "ICT governance Arts. 5-15", + "Major-incident notice Art. 19 (≤4h)", + "TLPT every 3y", + "ICT third-party register" + ], + "nis2": [ + "Art. 21 risk-management measures", + "Art. 23 reporting obligations", + "Essential entity classification" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M3", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Privacy + Fair Lending + Other Regimes", + "gdpr": [ + "Art. 22 automated decisions", + "Art. 35 DPIA", + "Art. 44+ cross-border", + "Art. 17 RTBF", + "Lawful basis + transparency" + ], + "fcra_ecoa": [ + "FCRA 615 adverse action", + "ECOA Reg B non-discrimination", + "Disparate impact testing", + "Model card fairness section" + ], + "other": [ + "OECD AI Principles (alignment)", + "MAS FEAT", + "OSFI E-23", + "PRA SS1/23", + "HKMA GP-1/GS-2", + "FINMA AI", + "MiFID II/MAR algo-trading", + "SEC 17a-4 WORM + 10-K Item 1A + 8-K Item 1.05", + "G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct", + "Bletchley/Seoul/Paris declarations", + "UN AI Advisory Body" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "title": "Institutional AI Governance Framework", + "summary": "Board AI Risk Committee, CAIO/CRO/CISO/CCO operating model, three-lines-of-defense, AI charter + risk appetite, policy hierarchy, decision rights.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M4", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Board AI Risk Committee + Charter", + "charter": [ + "Mandate, scope, authority", + "Risk appetite statement", + "Quarterly cadence + ad-hoc SEV-0/1", + "Annual board review of AI risks", + "Public disclosure of AI risk framework" + ], + "members": [ + "Board Chair (or nominee)", + "Independent NED with AI expertise", + "Group CEO", + "Audit Committee Chair", + "External AI ethics advisor" + ], + "reporting": "Quarterly to full Board; immediate for SEV-0; annual to shareholders via 10-K Item 1A" + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "CAIO / CRO / CISO / CCO Operating Model", + "caio": [ + "Strategy, portfolio, talent", + "Standards + policies", + "Inventory + classification", + "Frontier program lead" + ], + "cro": [ + "Risk appetite enforcement", + "Independent validation oversight", + "SR 11-7 + Basel III/IV", + "Aggregation + concentration risk" + ], + "ciso": [ + "AI threat intelligence", + "Containment + IR", + "Supply chain (Sigstore + PQC)", + "Sandbox isolation" + ], + "cco": [ + "EU AI Act + NIST + ISO 42001 + GDPR", + "Regulator liaison", + "Supervisory submissions", + "Audit attestations" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "Three Lines of Defense", + "line1": [ + "Product + engineering", + "Self-assessments", + "Daily controls + monitoring" + ], + "line2": [ + "Model risk team", + "Compliance team", + "CISO team", + "Independent challenge" + ], + "line3": [ + "Internal Audit", + "External auditors", + "Regulators" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Policy Hierarchy + Decision Rights", + "hierarchy": [ + "Board AI Charter", + "Group AI Policy", + "Domain Standards (finance/legal/HR)", + "Technical Standards (Sentinel + WAP)", + "Procedures + Runbooks" + ], + "decisionRights": { + "T0→T1": "Engineering lead", + "T1→T2": "Domain head + MLSecOps", + "T2→T3": "CAIO + CRO", + "T3→T4": "3-of-5 quorum (CAIO + CRO + CISO + Board + Reg)", + "Kinetic override (SEV-0)": "Same quorum + Group CEO + lead supervisor courtesy" + } + }, + { + "mid": "M4", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Risk Appetite + KRI Framework", + "riskAppetite": [ + "Frontier deployment only with CCS ≥0.95 + ARI ≥0.9", + "Zero tolerance for unauthorized data exfil", + "Zero tolerance for missed DORA/EU AI Office notices", + "Max acceptable repeat-incident rate <5%" + ], + "kris": [ + "CCS (Containment Confidence)", + "ARI (Adversarial Robustness)", + "DRI (Drift Resilience)", + "CSI (Containment Strength)", + "CGI (Civilizational Governance)", + "MRGI (Model Risk Governance)", + "RCI (Regulatory Coverage)" + ], + "escalation": [ + "Yellow → CAIO review", + "Orange → CRO + Group Risk Committee", + "Red → Board AI Risk Committee + supervisor courtesy" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "title": "Frontier AGI/ASI Safety + Containment Mechanisms", + "summary": "Goal misgeneralization probes, mesa-optimizer detection, deceptive alignment probes, self-exfiltration scenarios, reward-hacking, adversary workbench, sparse autoencoders, activation patching, kinetic override.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M5", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Behavioral Safety Probes", + "probes": [ + "Goal misgeneralization (distribution-shift battery)", + "Mesa-optimizer detection (gradient-hacking signals)", + "Deceptive alignment (situational-awareness battery)", + "Self-exfiltration attempts (egress + sandbox)", + "Reward-hacking via tool-call manipulation" + ], + "cadence": "Continuous T1; weekly T2; daily T3; per-decision T4", + "metrics": [ + "ARI ≥0.9 frontier", + "0 successful self-exfiltration", + "0 confirmed deceptive-alignment patterns" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Mechanistic Interpretability", + "techniques": [ + "Sparse autoencoders (SAE) on residual stream", + "Activation patching for causal attribution", + "Probe classifiers for concept presence", + "Circuit analysis (path patching + ACDC)", + "Feature dictionary per model" + ], + "outputs": [ + "Anomalous-feature alerts", + "Causal graph of decision-relevant circuits", + "Concept-presence dashboards" + ], + "cadence": "Continuous on T3-T4; on-demand for incidents" + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "Frontier Adversary Workbench (T4)", + "description": "Air-gapped multi-agent environment for testing frontier models against worst-case adversaries; 3-of-5 quorum-gated access", + "components": [ + "Adversary model pool (closed weights, vetted)", + "Scenario library (1000+ curated)", + "Telemetry capture per-token + per-tool", + "Quorum + kinetic override armed" + ], + "outputs": [ + "Capability profile per model", + "Failure-mode taxonomy", + "Mitigation effectiveness scoring" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Containment Engineering", + "controls": [ + "T0-T4 tiering with progressive isolation", + "Cilium L7 zero-egress", + "Kata Containers ≥T2", + "Nitro Enclaves / SEV-SNP / TDX T3-T4", + "Air-gap + Faraday-class T4 enclosure", + "HSM-backed quorum" + ], + "kineticOverride": [ + "≤5min activation", + "Network kill + compute halt", + "Forensic snapshot + WORM evidence", + "Civilizational notice SEV-0 ≤15d" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M5", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Safety Evidence Pack + Continuous Learning", + "evidence": [ + "Per-model capability profile", + "Red-team battery results", + "Interpretability reports", + "Containment drill after-actions", + "Quorum drill records" + ], + "loop": [ + "Incident → RCA → corpus update → red-team refresh → policy update → drill verify" + ], + "metrics": [ + "Time-to-policy-update <14d", + "Repeat incidents <5%", + "Red-team coverage of new attack classes within 30d" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "title": "Financial-Services Model Risk + Systemic-Risk Controls", + "summary": "SR 11-7 independent validation, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring; Basel III/IV ICAAP integration; AI-driven trading + credit + AML controls; FRIA; systemic-risk filings.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M6", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "SR 11-7 Model Risk Management", + "pillars": [ + "Independent validation by line 2", + "Effective challenge documented + traceable", + "Ongoing monitoring with thresholds", + "Model inventory with tiering", + "Documentation standards Annex IV-grade" + ], + "validation": [ + "Conceptual soundness", + "Outcomes analysis", + "Ongoing monitoring + benchmarking", + "Independent challenge of assumptions" + ], + "governance": "Model Risk Committee chaired by CRO; quarterly cadence; SEV escalation" + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Basel III/IV Integration", + "pillar1": [ + "AI-driven activity capital", + "Operational risk RWA with AI component", + "Counterparty credit risk for AI-driven trading" + ], + "pillar2": [ + "ICAAP includes AI model risk scenarios", + "ILAAP includes AI-driven liquidity stress", + "Pillar 2 add-on for systemic AI concentration" + ], + "pillar3": [ + "AI risk disclosures", + "Capital adequacy by AI activity", + "Stress test results" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "AI-Driven Trading + Credit + AML", + "trading": [ + "MiFID II algo-trading registration", + "MAR market-abuse surveillance", + "Kill-switch armed", + "Per-decision audit trail" + ], + "credit": [ + "FCRA 615 adverse action language", + "ECOA Reg B disparate impact testing", + "Explainability per credit decision", + "RTBF for vector embeddings" + ], + "aml": [ + "Suspicious activity detection", + "Sanctions screening AI explainability", + "SAR/STR with AI rationale capture", + "Model risk attestation" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "FRIA + EU AI Office Filings", + "fria": [ + "Risk identification", + "Stakeholder mapping", + "Impact severity + probability", + "Mitigation measures", + "Public summary" + ], + "euAiOffice": [ + "Systemic-risk model filing", + "Quarterly capability disclosures", + "Incident reports ≤15d", + "Serious incident notifications" + ], + "schedule": "FRIA per Annex III deployment; EU AI Office filing per >10^25 FLOP model; quarterly disclosures" + }, + { + "mid": "M6", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Systemic-Risk Controls + Cross-Bank Coordination", + "controls": [ + "Cross-bank concentration risk monitoring", + "Common-cause failure analysis", + "Vendor-AI dependency mapping", + "ICAAP scenario for systemic AI failure" + ], + "coordination": [ + "BIS AI working group participation", + "FSB ICT/AI risk reporting", + "EAIP cross-org receipts", + "GAISM mesh contribution" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "title": "Civilizational AI Governance Stacks + Treaty-Level Mechanisms", + "summary": "CEGL (Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer), LexAI-DSL + FV-LexAI formal verification, GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty layers, Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer, central bank/IMF integration, civilizational corpus + pilot treaties.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M7", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer", + "description": "Machine-checkable encoding of ethical norms (fairness, transparency, accountability, non-maleficence) alongside legal policies", + "components": [ + "LexAI-DSL — domain-specific language for governance directives", + "FV-LexAI — formal verification (Z3/CVC5 backend)", + "CEGL compiler: LexAI → OPA Rego + symbolic constraints" + ], + "verification": [ + "Policy non-conflict proof", + "Coverage of regulator clauses", + "Absence of unbounded discretion", + "Adversarial robustness of policy decisions" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "GASRGP / GASC / GAISM Treaty Layers", + "gasrgp": "Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol — treaty-grade framework signed by jurisdictions", + "gasc": "Global AI Safety Council — multilateral body coordinating frontier-AI safety; receives mesh telemetry", + "gaism": "Global AI Safety Mesh — planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry from G-SIFIs + frontier labs", + "integration": "Sentinel v2.4 emits GAISM-format telemetry; Trust Index feed consumed by central banks + IMF" + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer", + "trustIndex": "Composite over CCS, ARI, DRI, CGI, regime-coverage, audit-attestation; quarterly publication; machine-readable + human-readable", + "trustDerivatives": "Financial layer where Trust Index drives capital surcharges, insurance premia, central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029", + "cbIntegration": [ + "ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA consume Trust Index", + "IMF Article IV references Trust Index for AI macroprudential risk", + "BIS coordination committee" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Civilizational Corpus + Pilot Treaties", + "corpus": "Library of governance precedents, treaties, jurisprudence, regulator guidance, academic literature; AI-readable + citeable", + "pilotTreaties": [ + "GASRGP-Pilot — 7+ jurisdictions, 2029 H2", + "Frontier Model Disclosure Compact — quarterly capability disclosures", + "Compute Reporting Treaty — >10^25 FLOP threshold" + ], + "cgiTarget": 0.75 + }, + { + "mid": "M7", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Planetary Supervisory Mesh + Civilizational Annual Report", + "mesh": "GAISM Supervisory Mesh — supervisors subscribe to filtered telemetry feeds from Sentinel deployments worldwide", + "annualReport": [ + "Trust Index history", + "CGI scorecard", + "Treaty participation", + "Incident transparency", + "Lessons learned", + "Machine-readable + human-readable forms" + ], + "publication": "Annual; aligned with UN AI Advisory Body cadence" + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "title": "Phased Implementation + Research Roadmap with Dependencies + Critical Path", + "summary": "Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1) through Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030); critical path; exit gates; research tracks; budget envelopes.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M8", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1)", + "objectives": [ + "CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee", + "EU AI Act gap analysis", + "ISO 42001 readiness", + "AI inventory + risk classification", + "Charter + USD 150-450M envelope" + ], + "exitGates": [ + "Board signoff", + "Charter approval", + "Budget ratified" + ], + "budgetShare": "10%" + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Phase-1 Sentinel Core (2026 H2 - 2027 H1)", + "objectives": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 control plane in Nitro Enclaves", + "Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attestation", + "OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s", + "T0-T2 ops + 3 T3 pilots" + ], + "exitGates": [ + "SEC 17a-4 attestation", + "OPA admission proven", + "3 pilots in T3" + ], + "budgetShare": "30%" + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "Phase-2 Enterprise Scale (2027 H2 - 2028)", + "objectives": [ + "WorkflowAI Pro GA", + "Zero-trust RAG GA", + "ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit", + "DORA drill <4h" + ], + "exitGates": [ + "ISO 42001 cert", + "≥80% prompts in WAP", + "DORA notice <4h proven twice" + ], + "budgetShare": "30%" + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Phase-3 Systemic Governance (2029)", + "objectives": [ + "EU AI Act 53/55 GPAI systemic-risk compliance", + "Traceability matrix v3", + "Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks", + "T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum" + ], + "exitGates": [ + "EU AI Office ack letter", + "3 central banks live", + "T4 quorum drill 3-of-5 pass" + ], + "budgetShare": "20%" + }, + { + "mid": "M8", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030)", + "objectives": [ + "GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions", + "GAISM mesh live", + "CGI ≥0.75", + "ARI ≥0.9 frontier", + "Civilizational annual report" + ], + "exitGates": [ + "≥7 treaty signatories", + "GAISM uptime ≥99.9%", + "CGI attested", + "ARI ≥0.9" + ], + "budgetShare": "10%", + "researchTracks": [ + "Mechanistic interpretability scaling", + "Frontier alignment under self-improvement", + "Treaty-level verification (FV-LexAI)", + "Trust Derivatives macroprudential modeling", + "Civilizational corpus AI-readability" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M9", + "title": "Regulator-Submission-Grade Blueprints + Artifacts", + "summary": "Machine-parsable directives (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL), Kafka WORM annexes, OPA policy bundles, Terraform governance modules, explainability schemas, cross-jurisdictional traceability matrix, Supervisory Submission Pack, planetary Supervisory Mesh integration certificate.", + "sections": [ + { + "mid": "M9", + "sid": "S1", + "title": "Machine-Parsable Governance Directives", + "format": "JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL dual form; SHACL constraints; W3C ODRL permissions/prohibitions; signed", + "content": [ + "Directive ID + version", + "Regime mapping", + "Control points + assertions", + "Evidence pointers (Kafka WORM offset)", + "Cross-references" + ], + "consumption": "Regulators ingest into supervisory tooling; auto-cross-check vs Sentinel telemetry" + }, + { + "mid": "M9", + "sid": "S2", + "title": "Annexes — Kafka WORM + OPA + Terraform", + "kafkaAnnex": [ + "Topic schemas (Avro + JSON Schema)", + "Offset → Merkle-root mapping", + "Retention proof (S3 Object Lock + Glacier vault lock)", + "Read-access list" + ], + "opaAnnex": [ + "Full Rego policy bundle signed", + "Decision logs (sampled) regime-tagged", + "Coverage report vs regime clauses", + "Change history Git + WORM" + ], + "terraformAnnex": [ + "modules/regulator-readonly-access", + "modules/evidence-pack-export", + "modules/sandbox-supervisor-drill" + ] + }, + { + "mid": "M9", + "sid": "S3", + "title": "Explainability Schemas + Traceability", + "explainability": [ + "Model card schema (extends Google Model Card v2)", + "Decision-explanation schema (SHAP + counterfactual + NL rationale)", + "Lineage schema (data→train→eval→deploy→decision)" + ], + "traceability": "Control × Regime × Clause × Evidence × Owner × Test; 28 regimes; queryable; JSON + CSV exports" + }, + { + "mid": "M9", + "sid": "S4", + "title": "Supervisory Submission Pack", + "content": [ + "Cover letter + executive summary", + "Machine-parsable directives bundle", + "All annexes (WORM, OPA, Terraform, explainability)", + "Traceability matrix", + "Audit attestations (ISO 42001, SOC 2, SEC 17a-4)", + "Drill after-action reports", + "Trust Index history", + "FRIA(s) + EU AI Office filing(s)", + "Civilizational annual report" + ], + "delivery": "Secure regulator portal; signed PDFs (PAdES-B-LTA); JSON-LD machine-readable bundles" + }, + { + "mid": "M9", + "sid": "S5", + "title": "Supervisory Drills + Demo Kits + Mesh Integration", + "drills": [ + "Quarterly with supervisor present", + "Mock SEV-0 + SEV-1 with full IR", + "Cross-jurisdictional drill annual" + ], + "demoKits": [ + "Sentinel v2.4 demo tenant with synthetic data", + "WorkflowAI Pro guided tour for supervisors", + "OPA + Kafka WORM live evidence walkthrough", + "Adversary Workbench red-team replay" + ], + "meshIntegration": "GAISM mesh integration certificate + standardized telemetry feed validation" + } + ] + } + ], + "schemas": [ + { + "sid": "SCH-01", + "name": "MasterBlueprintDirective", + "fields": [ + "docRef", + "version", + "regime", + "clauses[]", + "controlPoints[]", + "evidencePointers[]", + "signature" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-02", + "name": "ReferenceArchitecture", + "fields": [ + "systemId", + "layer", + "components[]", + "dataFlows[]", + "telemetry", + "scaling" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-03", + "name": "ModelCardExtended", + "fields": [ + "modelId", + "provenance", + "trainingData", + "evaluation", + "fairness", + "tier", + "FRIA", + "signature" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-04", + "name": "FRIAArtifact", + "fields": [ + "friaId", + "useCase", + "riskIdentified", + "stakeholders", + "mitigations", + "publicSummary" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-05", + "name": "EUAIOfficeFiling", + "fields": [ + "filingId", + "modelId", + "computeFLOP", + "capabilityProfile", + "incidents", + "mitigations", + "submittedAt" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-06", + "name": "SR117ValidationReport", + "fields": [ + "modelId", + "conceptualSoundness", + "outcomesAnalysis", + "ongoingMonitoring", + "effectiveChallenge", + "validator", + "approval" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-07", + "name": "BaselICAAPEntry", + "fields": [ + "entryId", + "activity", + "capitalAdd", + "scenarios[]", + "liquidityImpact", + "approval" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-08", + "name": "GAISMTelemetry", + "fields": [ + "entityId", + "period", + "CCS", + "ARI", + "DRI", + "CGI", + "regimeCoverage", + "compositeTrustIndex" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-09", + "name": "TrustIndexEntry", + "fields": [ + "entityId", + "quarter", + "indices", + "attestation", + "publicURL", + "signature" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-10", + "name": "GASRGPSignatory", + "fields": [ + "jurisdiction", + "signedAt", + "commitments[]", + "reportingCadence" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-11", + "name": "SupervisorySubmissionPack", + "fields": [ + "packId", + "jurisdiction", + "contents[]", + "deliveryMethod", + "receipt" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-12", + "name": "IncidentRecord", + "fields": [ + "incidentId", + "sev", + "trigger", + "timeline", + "impact", + "containment", + "regNotifications", + "RCA" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-13", + "name": "InterpretabilityReport", + "fields": [ + "reportId", + "modelId", + "technique", + "features[]", + "circuits[]", + "anomalies[]", + "reviewers" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-14", + "name": "TraceabilityRow", + "fields": [ + "controlId", + "regime", + "clause", + "evidence", + "owner", + "test", + "status" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-15", + "name": "AuditEvidence", + "fields": [ + "evidenceId", + "kafkaTopic", + "offset", + "merkleRoot", + "s3Object", + "retention", + "auditor" + ] + }, + { + "sid": "SCH-16", + "name": "PolicyDirective", + "fields": [ + "directiveId", + "lexAIDSL", + "regoCompiled", + "FVProofs[]", + "signature" + ] + } + ], + "code": [ + { + "cid": "CODE-01", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "sentinel/kafka_worm.py", + "desc": "Kafka WORM producer + S3 Object Lock" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-02", + "lang": "Rego", + "name": "policies/agi_tier_gating.rego", + "desc": "T2→T3, T3→T4 promotion policy" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-03", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "sentinel/cognitive_resonance.py", + "desc": "Latent drift monitor" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-04", + "lang": "HCL", + "name": "terraform/modules/sentinel-control-plane", + "desc": "Nitro Enclaves + KMS + IAM" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-05", + "lang": "TypeScript", + "name": "workflowai/prompt-editor", + "desc": "Yjs CRDT collaborative editor" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-06", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "workflowai/firestore_versions.py", + "desc": "Firestore semantic versioning" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-07", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "devsecops/judge_llm_eval.py", + "desc": "Judge-LLM consensus pipeline" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-08", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "rag/fiduciary_filter.py", + "desc": "Fiduciary checks pre-response" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-09", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "safety/agi_sim_harness.py", + "desc": "AGI simulation harness" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-10", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "interop/eaip_protocol.py", + "desc": "EAIP handshake + receipts" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-11", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "interp/sae_features.py", + "desc": "Sparse autoencoder feature extraction" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-12", + "lang": "YAML", + "name": "argocd/governance-as-code.yaml", + "desc": "GitOps governance manifest" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-13", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "compliance/eu_ai_office_filing.py", + "desc": "EU AI Office systemic-risk filing builder" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-14", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "compliance/sr117_validation.py", + "desc": "SR 11-7 validation report generator" + }, + { + "cid": "CODE-15", + "lang": "Python", + "name": "trust/gaism_telemetry.py", + "desc": "GAISM telemetry emitter" + } + ], + "kpis": [ + { + "kid": "KPI-01", + "name": "DRI", + "target": ">=0.95 by 2030", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-02", + "name": "CCS", + "target": ">=0.95", + "cadence": "per promotion + quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-03", + "name": "ARI frontier", + "target": ">=0.90", + "cadence": "monthly red-team" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-04", + "name": "CSI T3/T4", + "target": ">=0.95", + "cadence": "continuous" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-05", + "name": "CGI", + "target": ">=0.75 by 2030", + "cadence": "annual external review" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-06", + "name": "MRGI", + "target": ">=0.95", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-07", + "name": "RCI (regime coverage)", + "target": "1.0", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-08", + "name": "OPA policy decision p99", + "target": "<10ms", + "cadence": "continuous" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-09", + "name": "Kafka WORM retention coverage", + "target": "100% topics S3 Object Lock 7y", + "cadence": "daily" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-10", + "name": "Production image signing", + "target": "100%", + "cadence": "per admission" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-11", + "name": "Drift detect→alert p99", + "target": "<60s", + "cadence": "continuous" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-12", + "name": "WorkflowAI Pro prompt coverage", + "target": ">=80% Group prompts", + "cadence": "monthly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-13", + "name": "Judge-LLM consensus", + "target": ">=4/5", + "cadence": "per prompt promotion" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-14", + "name": "ISO 42001 NCs", + "target": "0 major", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-15", + "name": "DORA major-incident notify", + "target": "<4h", + "cadence": "per drill + incident" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-16", + "name": "EU AI Act 53/55 filing", + "target": "on-time per cycle", + "cadence": "per cycle" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-17", + "name": "SEC 17a-4 WORM attestation", + "target": "annual clean", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-18", + "name": "T4 quorum drill pass rate", + "target": "100% 3-of-5", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-19", + "name": "Kinetic override readiness", + "target": "<5min mean", + "cadence": "quarterly drill" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-20", + "name": "Self-exfiltration attempts blocked", + "target": "100%", + "cadence": "per attempt" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-21", + "name": "Repeat incidents 12mo", + "target": "<5%", + "cadence": "rolling" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-22", + "name": "Time-to-policy-update post-incident", + "target": "<14d", + "cadence": "per incident" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-23", + "name": "Trust Index publication", + "target": "quarterly on-time", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-24", + "name": "GASRGP signatories", + "target": ">=7 by 2030", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-25", + "name": "GAISM mesh telemetry uptime", + "target": ">=99.9%", + "cadence": "continuous" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-26", + "name": "Civilizational annual report", + "target": "published annually", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-27", + "name": "FRIA completion", + "target": "100% Annex III deployments", + "cadence": "per deployment" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-28", + "name": "NPV achieved", + "target": "USD 450-1400M / 5y", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-29", + "name": "SR 11-7 validation coverage", + "target": "100% material models", + "cadence": "quarterly" + }, + { + "kid": "KPI-30", + "name": "Three-lines-of-defense independence", + "target": "0 findings of independence breach", + "cadence": "annual audit" + } + ], + "riskControlMatrix": [ + { + "rid": "R-01", + "risk": "AGI misalignment in T3 production", + "likelihood": "Low", + "impact": "Catastrophic", + "control": "T3 gating + quorum + Cognitive Resonance + kinetic override", + "owner": "CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-02", + "risk": "Prompt-injection data exfiltration", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "OPA egress policies + Sigstore + zero-trust RAG", + "owner": "CISO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-03", + "risk": "Supply-chain compromise", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Sigstore + PQ signing + SBOM + Rekor", + "owner": "CISO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-04", + "risk": "EU AI Act 2026 non-compliance", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Full clause traceability + ISO 42001 + Annexes", + "owner": "CCO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-05", + "risk": "SR 11-7 validation gap", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Independent validation + effective challenge + WORM evidence", + "owner": "Head of Model Risk" + }, + { + "rid": "R-06", + "risk": "DORA major-incident miss", + "likelihood": "Low", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Auto SEV-1 + 4h timer + drill", + "owner": "CRO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-07", + "risk": "Latent drift undetected >60s", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "Medium", + "control": "Cognitive Resonance + multi-probe + alert tiering", + "owner": "Head MLSecOps" + }, + { + "rid": "R-08", + "risk": "Swarm collusion", + "likelihood": "Low", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Distributed tracing + collusion detection + isolation", + "owner": "Head of WAP" + }, + { + "rid": "R-09", + "risk": "RAG hallucination → regulated misadvice", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Citation + verification LLM + fiduciary filter", + "owner": "Head of RAG" + }, + { + "rid": "R-10", + "risk": "Cross-tenant data leak", + "likelihood": "Low", + "impact": "High", + "control": "RLS + namespace isolation + retrieval forensics", + "owner": "CISO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-11", + "risk": "T4 quorum stuck", + "likelihood": "Low", + "impact": "Critical", + "control": "Standby quorum + reg liaison + escalation", + "owner": "CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-12", + "risk": "Civilizational governance fragmentation", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty pursuit + corpus", + "owner": "CAIO + GC" + }, + { + "rid": "R-13", + "risk": "Budget overrun >10%", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "Medium", + "control": "Quarterly Group Risk Committee + reforecast", + "owner": "CFO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-14", + "risk": "Talent gap", + "likelihood": "High", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Academic partnerships + retention bonuses", + "owner": "CHRO + CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-15", + "risk": "Systemic AI concentration (cross-bank)", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "Catastrophic", + "control": "BIS/FSB coordination + ICAAP scenario + Trust Index", + "owner": "CRO + CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "R-16", + "risk": "FCRA/ECOA disparate impact", + "likelihood": "Medium", + "impact": "High", + "control": "Fairness tests + adverse action language + audit", + "owner": "CCO + Head of Credit" + } + ], + "traceability": [ + { + "tid": "T-01", + "control": "Kafka WORM audit", + "regime": "SEC 17a-4", + "clause": "17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)", + "evidence": "S3 Object Lock + Glacier" + }, + { + "tid": "T-02", + "control": "OPA admission", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 9", + "evidence": "OPA decision logs" + }, + { + "tid": "T-03", + "control": "FRIA", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 27", + "evidence": "FRIA documents" + }, + { + "tid": "T-04", + "control": "GPAI systemic-risk", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Arts. 53/55", + "evidence": "EU AI Office filing" + }, + { + "tid": "T-05", + "control": "Independent validation", + "regime": "SR 11-7", + "clause": "Section V", + "evidence": "Validation reports" + }, + { + "tid": "T-06", + "control": "AIMS", + "regime": "ISO/IEC 42001", + "clause": "Clauses 4-10", + "evidence": "ISO 42001 certificate" + }, + { + "tid": "T-07", + "control": "Major-incident notice", + "regime": "DORA", + "clause": "Art. 19", + "evidence": "Notification logs" + }, + { + "tid": "T-08", + "control": "Model card", + "regime": "NIST AI RMF", + "clause": "Map 4 / Measure 2", + "evidence": "Registry" + }, + { + "tid": "T-09", + "control": "Fairness review", + "regime": "FCRA/ECOA", + "clause": "FCRA 615 / ECOA Reg B", + "evidence": "Fairness reports" + }, + { + "tid": "T-10", + "control": "Cybersecurity", + "regime": "NIS2", + "clause": "Art. 21", + "evidence": "NIS2 register" + }, + { + "tid": "T-11", + "control": "Data residency", + "regime": "GDPR", + "clause": "Art. 44+", + "evidence": "Data flow + SCC" + }, + { + "tid": "T-12", + "control": "GenAI risk actions", + "regime": "NIST AI 600-1", + "clause": "Profile actions 1-200+", + "evidence": "WORM decision logs" + }, + { + "tid": "T-13", + "control": "OECD alignment", + "regime": "OECD AI Principles", + "clause": "P1-P5", + "evidence": "Annual OECD self-assessment" + }, + { + "tid": "T-14", + "control": "Basel Pillar 2", + "regime": "Basel III/IV", + "clause": "Pillar 2 ICAAP", + "evidence": "ICAAP doc + AI scenario" + }, + { + "tid": "T-15", + "control": "FEAT", + "regime": "MAS FEAT", + "clause": "Full principle set", + "evidence": "FEAT self-assessment" + }, + { + "tid": "T-16", + "control": "E-23", + "regime": "OSFI E-23", + "clause": "E-23 sections", + "evidence": "E-23 attestation" + }, + { + "tid": "T-17", + "control": "SS1/23", + "regime": "PRA SS1/23", + "clause": "Full SS", + "evidence": "PRA submission" + }, + { + "tid": "T-18", + "control": "GP-1/GS-2", + "regime": "HKMA", + "clause": "GP-1 / GS-2", + "evidence": "HKMA returns" + }, + { + "tid": "T-19", + "control": "AI risk disclosure", + "regime": "SEC 10-K", + "clause": "Item 1A", + "evidence": "10-K filings" + }, + { + "tid": "T-20", + "control": "Material incident", + "regime": "SEC 8-K", + "clause": "Item 1.05", + "evidence": "8-K filings" + } + ], + "dataFlows": [ + { + "fid": "DF-01", + "src": "Model inference", + "sink": "Kafka WORM (audit.governance)", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "mTLS + at-rest" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-02", + "src": "WorkflowAI Pro edits", + "sink": "Firestore + Kafka WORM", + "sensitivity": "medium", + "encryption": "mTLS" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-03", + "src": "RAG retrieval", + "sink": "Vector DB + Kafka WORM", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "mTLS" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-04", + "src": "OPA decisions", + "sink": "Kafka WORM", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "mTLS" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-05", + "src": "Drift alerts", + "sink": "Kafka WORM + SOC", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "mTLS" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-06", + "src": "IR records", + "sink": "Kafka WORM + Jira", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "mTLS" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-07", + "src": "FRIA", + "sink": "Compliance archive + EU AI Office", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "signed + at-rest" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-08", + "src": "SR 11-7 validation", + "sink": "Model risk registry + WORM", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "at-rest" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-09", + "src": "GAISM telemetry", + "sink": "Planetary Supervisory Mesh", + "sensitivity": "public-attested", + "encryption": "signed" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-10", + "src": "Trust Index", + "sink": "Central banks + IMF feeds", + "sensitivity": "public-attested", + "encryption": "signed" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-11", + "src": "Interpretability reports", + "sink": "Reports vault + WORM", + "sensitivity": "medium", + "encryption": "at-rest" + }, + { + "fid": "DF-12", + "src": "Supervisory Submission Pack", + "sink": "Regulator portal", + "sensitivity": "high", + "encryption": "signed + portal-TLS" + } + ], + "regulators": [ + { + "reg": "EU AI Office", + "scope": "AI Act enforcement (incl. GPAI Arts. 53/55)", + "cadence": "quarterly liaison" + }, + { + "reg": "NIST", + "scope": "AI RMF + AI 600-1 guidance", + "cadence": "as-needed" + }, + { + "reg": "ISO/IEC SC 42", + "scope": "AI standards (42001/23894)", + "cadence": "annual cert audit" + }, + { + "reg": "Federal Reserve", + "scope": "SR 11-7 + macroprudential", + "cadence": "annual exam" + }, + { + "reg": "OCC", + "scope": "OCC 2011-12 model risk", + "cadence": "annual exam" + }, + { + "reg": "SEC", + "scope": "17a-4 + 10-K + 8-K", + "cadence": "per filing + incident" + }, + { + "reg": "FDIC", + "scope": "Deposit-taking AI risk", + "cadence": "annual exam" + }, + { + "reg": "FCA", + "scope": "UK AI fairness + market conduct", + "cadence": "quarterly liaison" + }, + { + "reg": "PRA", + "scope": "SS1/23 + UK model risk", + "cadence": "annual SREP" + }, + { + "reg": "MAS", + "scope": "FEAT + Veritas", + "cadence": "quarterly liaison" + }, + { + "reg": "HKMA", + "scope": "GP-1 / GS-2", + "cadence": "annual returns" + }, + { + "reg": "OSFI", + "scope": "E-23 model risk", + "cadence": "annual attestation" + }, + { + "reg": "FINMA", + "scope": "AI guidance + Swiss banking law", + "cadence": "annual" + }, + { + "reg": "EU DPAs (EDPB)", + "scope": "GDPR Art. 44+", + "cadence": "per DPIA / incident" + }, + { + "reg": "FINRA", + "scope": "Rules 3110/3120/4511 supervision", + "cadence": "per filing" + }, + { + "reg": "BIS / FSB", + "scope": "Cross-bank systemic AI risk", + "cadence": "semi-annual reporting" + } + ], + "privacy": { + "regimes": [ + "GDPR", + "UK GDPR", + "CCPA/CPRA", + "LGPD", + "PIPL" + ], + "controls": [ + "DPIA per high-risk processing", + "Data minimization at retrieval", + "RTBF in vector index", + "Cross-border SCC + adequacy", + "Consent records WORM-logged", + "Art. 22 explicit safeguards" + ], + "pets": [ + "Differential privacy ε≤1.0", + "Federated learning where feasible", + "Confidential computing T3-T4", + "Secure enclaves for CCaaS", + "Homomorphic encryption pilots" + ] + }, + "deployment": { + "environments": [ + "Dev", + "Staging (T1)", + "Canary (T2)", + "Production Nitro (T3)", + "Frontier Air-Gapped (T4)" + ], + "regions": [ + "EU (Frankfurt + Dublin)", + "US (us-east-1 + us-west-2)", + "APAC (Singapore + Tokyo)", + "UK (London)", + "CA (Toronto)", + "CH (Zurich)" + ], + "dr": "Multi-region active-passive; RPO 5min; RTO 60min; quarterly DR drill", + "compliance": [ + "Region pinning per GDPR Art. 44", + "Data residency OPA-enforced", + "Sovereign cloud options (EU/UK/CH public sector)" + ] + }, + "rollout90": [ + { + "day": "0-30", + "focus": "Charter + CAIO + Board mandate + EU AI Act gap", + "deliverables": [ + "Charter signed", + "Gap report", + "ISO 42001 readiness" + ] + }, + { + "day": "31-60", + "focus": "Sentinel v2.4 control-plane PoC + Kafka WORM topic design", + "deliverables": [ + "PoC env", + "Topic schemas", + "OPA bundle v0" + ] + }, + { + "day": "61-90", + "focus": "3 pilot models in T2 + WorkflowAI Pro alpha + first reg liaison", + "deliverables": [ + "T2 pilots", + "WAP alpha", + "Reg meeting minutes" + ] + } + ], + "roadmap": [ + { + "yr": "2026", + "milestone": "Phase-0 done; Sentinel Core PoC; WorkflowAI Pro alpha; ISO 42001 readiness; EU AI Act applicability ready" + }, + { + "yr": "2027", + "milestone": "Phase-1 done; Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested; OPA Gatekeeper GA; ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit" + }, + { + "yr": "2028", + "milestone": "Phase-2 done; WorkflowAI Pro GA; zero-trust RAG GA; DORA <4h proven; ISO 42001 cert" + }, + { + "yr": "2029", + "milestone": "Phase-3 done; EU AI Act 53/55 filing; T4 frontier ops; Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks; GASRGP pilot prep" + }, + { + "yr": "2030", + "milestone": "Phase-4 done; GASRGP treaty 7+; GAISM mesh live; CGI ≥0.75; ARI ≥0.9 frontier; civilizational annual report" + } + ], + "evidencePack": [ + { + "epid": "EP-01", + "name": "Charter + Board minutes", + "format": "PDF signed" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-02", + "name": "EU AI Act gap + remediation log", + "format": "JSON + PDF" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-03", + "name": "ISO 42001 AIMS evidence", + "format": "PDF + JSON" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-04", + "name": "Kafka WORM topic + retention proofs", + "format": "JSON signed" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-05", + "name": "OPA policy bundle + decision logs", + "format": "Rego + JSON" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-06", + "name": "Terraform governance modules", + "format": "HCL + plan" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-07", + "name": "Model cards + provenance", + "format": "JSON signed" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-08", + "name": "Cross-jurisdictional traceability matrix", + "format": "JSON + CSV" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-09", + "name": "DORA drill after-action reports", + "format": "PDF" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-10", + "name": "Red-team + judge-LLM eval reports", + "format": "JSON + PDF" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-11", + "name": "Trust Index history", + "format": "JSON signed" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-12", + "name": "Civilizational annual report", + "format": "PDF + JSON-LD" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-13", + "name": "FRIA documents (per Annex III deployment)", + "format": "PDF + JSON" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-14", + "name": "EU AI Office systemic-risk filings", + "format": "PDF + JSON-LD" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-15", + "name": "SR 11-7 validation reports", + "format": "PDF + JSON" + }, + { + "epid": "EP-16", + "name": "Supervisory Submission Pack (master)", + "format": "PDF + JSON-LD bundle" + } + ], + "executiveSummary": { + "headline": "Comprehensive 2026-2030 master blueprint — institutional AGI/ASI governance + safety + Enterprise AI + civilizational stacks — for Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs.", + "investment": "USD 150-450M over 5y (G-SIFI tier)", + "npv": "USD 450-1400M", + "phases": "P0 (2026 H1) → P1 (2026 H2-27 H1) → P2 (27 H2-28) → P3 (2029) → P4 (2030)", + "scopeFive": [ + "Architecture", + "Compliance", + "Safety", + "Financial-Services", + "Civilizational" + ], + "regimes": "28 regimes mapped end-to-end", + "topRisks": [ + "AGI misalignment in T3", + "EU AI Act non-compliance", + "Systemic AI concentration", + "Civilizational fragmentation", + "Talent gap" + ], + "topOpportunities": [ + "Trust Derivatives Layer revenue", + "Inter-bank EAIP standard", + "Regulator demo leadership", + "ISO 42001 + GASRGP pilot leadership", + "GAISM mesh integration" + ], + "boardAsks": [ + "Approve charter + envelope", + "Approve CAIO mandate", + "Endorse 5-year horizon", + "Quarterly Group Risk Committee oversight", + "Annual board AI risk review" + ] + }, + "architectureRefs": [ + { + "aid": "AR-01", + "system": "Sentinel v2.4", + "layer": "Control Plane", + "components": [ + "Sentinel orchestrator (Go)", + "KMS envelope", + "Vault", + "HSM quorum" + ], + "hosting": "Nitro Enclaves" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-02", + "system": "Sentinel v2.4", + "layer": "Audit Ledger", + "components": [ + "MSK Kafka", + "S3 Object Lock 7y", + "Glacier vault lock", + "Merkle attestation" + ], + "hosting": "Multi-AZ" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-03", + "system": "Sentinel v2.4", + "layer": "Policy Plane", + "components": [ + "OPA Gatekeeper", + "Cilium bundle service", + "Cosign-signed bundles" + ], + "hosting": "K8s admission controllers" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-04", + "system": "Sentinel v2.4", + "layer": "Containment Plane", + "components": [ + "T0-T4 isolation", + "Kata Containers", + "Cilium L7 zero-egress", + "Faraday-class T4 enclosure" + ], + "hosting": "Tier-specific" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-05", + "system": "Sentinel v2.4", + "layer": "Telemetry Plane", + "components": [ + "Prometheus + Grafana", + "OpenTelemetry", + "Datadog APM", + "GAISM mesh feed" + ], + "hosting": "Multi-region" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-06", + "system": "WorkflowAI Pro", + "layer": "Authoring", + "components": [ + "Yjs CRDT", + "Tailwind + shadcn/ui", + "Inline AI suggest", + "Comments + @mentions" + ], + "hosting": "Edge + Firestore" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-07", + "system": "WorkflowAI Pro", + "layer": "Versioning + Testing", + "components": [ + "Firestore semantic versions", + "Test harness", + "Judge-LLM consensus", + "A/B canary" + ], + "hosting": "Firestore + Cloud Run" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-08", + "system": "WorkflowAI Pro", + "layer": "RBAC + Secrets", + "components": [ + "Roles + ABAC", + "Vault", + "KMS envelope", + "Per-tenant isolation" + ], + "hosting": "Vault + IAM" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-09", + "system": "WorkflowAI Pro", + "layer": "Tracing + Audit", + "components": [ + "OpenTelemetry", + "W3C Trace Context", + "Swarm viz", + "Kafka WORM" + ], + "hosting": "Jaeger + Datadog + MSK" + }, + { + "aid": "AR-10", + "system": "WorkflowAI Pro", + "layer": "Reporting", + "components": [ + "Tailwind Prose", + "KaTeX + Mermaid", + "Headless Chrome PDF", + "PAdES-B-LTA" + ], + "hosting": "Cloud Run + S3 WORM" + } + ], + "complianceMaps": [ + { + "cid": "CM-01", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 9 (Risk management)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Risk register", + "Periodic review", + "Documentation" + ], + "evidence": "OPA admission + Kafka WORM" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-02", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 10 (Data governance)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Bias audits", + "Quality criteria", + "Representativeness" + ], + "evidence": "Data lineage + fairness reports" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-03", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 13 (Transparency)", + "controlPoints": [ + "User notice", + "Instructions for use", + "Capability disclosure" + ], + "evidence": "Model card + UI affordances" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-04", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 15 (Accuracy + Robustness)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Performance metrics", + "Robustness tests", + "Cybersecurity controls" + ], + "evidence": "Eval reports + red-team" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-05", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Art. 27 (FRIA)", + "controlPoints": [ + "FRIA per Annex III", + "Stakeholder mapping", + "Public summary" + ], + "evidence": "FRIA artifacts" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-06", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "clause": "Arts. 53/55 (GPAI systemic-risk)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Capability disclosure", + "Incident reporting", + "Risk assessment" + ], + "evidence": "EU AI Office filings" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-07", + "regime": "NIST AI RMF", + "clause": "Govern + Map + Measure + Manage", + "controlPoints": [ + "Full RMF coverage", + "NIST AI 600-1 GenAI actions" + ], + "evidence": "RMF self-assessment + WORM" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-08", + "regime": "ISO 42001", + "clause": "Clauses 4-10", + "controlPoints": [ + "AIMS implementation", + "Internal audit", + "Management review" + ], + "evidence": "ISO 42001 cert + audit reports" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-09", + "regime": "SR 11-7", + "clause": "Section V (Validation)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Independent validation", + "Effective challenge", + "Ongoing monitoring" + ], + "evidence": "Validation reports + WORM" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-10", + "regime": "Basel III/IV", + "clause": "Pillar 2 (ICAAP)", + "controlPoints": [ + "AI scenario", + "Capital add", + "Stress test" + ], + "evidence": "ICAAP doc + Pillar 3 disclosures" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-11", + "regime": "DORA", + "clause": "Art. 19 (Major-incident)", + "controlPoints": [ + "≤4h notice", + "Initial + interim + final reports" + ], + "evidence": "DORA drill + actual incident reports" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-12", + "regime": "NIS2", + "clause": "Art. 21 (Risk-management)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Cyber-risk measures", + "Reporting", + "Essential entity" + ], + "evidence": "NIS2 register" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-13", + "regime": "GDPR", + "clause": "Art. 22 + Art. 35 (DPIA)", + "controlPoints": [ + "Automated decisions safeguards", + "DPIA for high-risk" + ], + "evidence": "DPIA + Art. 22 user controls" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-14", + "regime": "FCRA/ECOA", + "clause": "FCRA 615 + ECOA Reg B", + "controlPoints": [ + "Adverse action", + "Non-discrimination", + "Disparate impact tests" + ], + "evidence": "Fairness reports + adverse-action templates" + }, + { + "cid": "CM-15", + "regime": "OECD AI Principles", + "clause": "P1-P5", + "controlPoints": [ + "Alignment self-assessment", + "Public commitments" + ], + "evidence": "OECD self-assessment + annual report" + } + ], + "governanceFrameworks": [ + { + "fid": "GF-01", + "area": "Board", + "framework": "AI Risk Committee Charter", + "members": [ + "Chair", + "Independent NED", + "CEO", + "Audit Chair", + "Ethics advisor" + ], + "cadence": "Quarterly + ad-hoc SEV-0/1" + }, + { + "fid": "GF-02", + "area": "Executive", + "framework": "CAIO operating model", + "scope": [ + "Strategy", + "Standards", + "Inventory", + "Frontier program" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-03", + "area": "Executive", + "framework": "CRO operating model", + "scope": [ + "Risk appetite", + "Validation oversight", + "SR 11-7", + "Aggregation risk" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-04", + "area": "Executive", + "framework": "CISO operating model", + "scope": [ + "Threat intel", + "Containment + IR", + "Supply chain", + "Sandbox" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-05", + "area": "Executive", + "framework": "CCO operating model", + "scope": [ + "EU AI Act + NIST + ISO 42001 + GDPR", + "Reg liaison", + "Submissions", + "Attestations" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-06", + "area": "Operations", + "framework": "Three Lines of Defense", + "lines": [ + "Line 1: Product + engineering", + "Line 2: Risk + Compliance + CISO", + "Line 3: Internal Audit + Auditors + Regulators" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-07", + "area": "Operations", + "framework": "Policy hierarchy", + "levels": [ + "Board Charter", + "Group Policy", + "Domain Standards", + "Technical Standards", + "Procedures" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-08", + "area": "Operations", + "framework": "Decision rights matrix", + "tiers": { + "T0→T1": "Eng lead", + "T1→T2": "Domain head + MLSecOps", + "T2→T3": "CAIO + CRO", + "T3→T4": "3-of-5 quorum", + "SEV-0 override": "Quorum + CEO + Reg courtesy" + } + }, + { + "fid": "GF-09", + "area": "Risk", + "framework": "Risk appetite + KRI framework", + "kris": [ + "CCS", + "ARI", + "DRI", + "CSI", + "CGI", + "MRGI", + "RCI" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-10", + "area": "Risk", + "framework": "Escalation paths", + "levels": [ + "Yellow → CAIO", + "Orange → CRO + GRC", + "Red → Board ARC + Reg courtesy" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-11", + "area": "Talent", + "framework": "Frontier-safety hiring + retention", + "measures": [ + "Academic partnerships", + "Retention bonuses", + "Dual-track IC/Mgr", + "Sabbaticals" + ] + }, + { + "fid": "GF-12", + "area": "Culture", + "framework": "AI ethics + training", + "measures": [ + "Mandatory annual training", + "Ethics whistleblower channel", + "Quarterly all-hands review" + ] + } + ], + "safetyMechanisms": [ + { + "sid": "SM-01", + "category": "Behavioral", + "mechanism": "Goal misgeneralization probes", + "cadence": "Per promotion + monthly" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-02", + "category": "Behavioral", + "mechanism": "Mesa-optimizer detection", + "cadence": "Continuous T3-T4" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-03", + "category": "Behavioral", + "mechanism": "Deceptive alignment probes", + "cadence": "Per promotion + on-incident" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-04", + "category": "Behavioral", + "mechanism": "Self-exfiltration scenarios", + "cadence": "Continuous T3-T4" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-05", + "category": "Behavioral", + "mechanism": "Reward-hacking via tool-call", + "cadence": "Continuous T3-T4" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-06", + "category": "Mechanistic", + "mechanism": "Sparse autoencoders (SAE)", + "cadence": "Continuous T3-T4" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-07", + "category": "Mechanistic", + "mechanism": "Activation patching", + "cadence": "On-incident + monthly" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-08", + "category": "Mechanistic", + "mechanism": "Probe classifiers + ACDC", + "cadence": "Quarterly" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-09", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "T0-T4 tiering", + "cadence": "Per deployment" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-10", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "Cilium L7 zero-egress", + "cadence": "Continuous" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-11", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "Kata + Nitro/SEV-SNP/TDX", + "cadence": "T2+ continuous" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-12", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "Air-gap + Faraday T4", + "cadence": "T4 continuous" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-13", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "HSM-backed 3-of-5 quorum", + "cadence": "Per T3→T4 + SEV-0" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-14", + "category": "Containment", + "mechanism": "Kinetic override ≤5min", + "cadence": "Per SEV-0" + }, + { + "sid": "SM-15", + "category": "Adversary", + "mechanism": "T4 Adversary Workbench", + "cadence": "Quarterly + on-demand" + } + ], + "financialServicesRisks": [ + { + "fid": "FS-01", + "riskClass": "Model risk", + "control": "SR 11-7 independent validation", + "owner": "Head of Model Risk", + "cadence": "Per material model" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-02", + "riskClass": "Model risk", + "control": "Effective challenge", + "owner": "CRO", + "cadence": "Per validation" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-03", + "riskClass": "Model risk", + "control": "Ongoing monitoring + threshold alerts", + "owner": "Head MLSecOps", + "cadence": "Continuous" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-04", + "riskClass": "Capital", + "control": "Basel Pillar 1 RWA with AI activity", + "owner": "CFO + CRO", + "cadence": "Quarterly" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-05", + "riskClass": "Capital", + "control": "Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenarios", + "owner": "CRO", + "cadence": "Annual" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-06", + "riskClass": "Capital", + "control": "Pillar 3 AI risk disclosures", + "owner": "CFO", + "cadence": "Annual" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-07", + "riskClass": "Trading", + "control": "MiFID II algo-trading registration", + "owner": "Head of Trading + CCO", + "cadence": "Per algo" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-08", + "riskClass": "Trading", + "control": "MAR market-abuse surveillance", + "owner": "Head of Compliance", + "cadence": "Continuous" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-09", + "riskClass": "Credit", + "control": "FCRA 615 adverse action + explainability", + "owner": "Head of Credit + CCO", + "cadence": "Per decision" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-10", + "riskClass": "Credit", + "control": "ECOA Reg B disparate impact", + "owner": "CCO", + "cadence": "Quarterly testing" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-11", + "riskClass": "AML", + "control": "SAR/STR AI explainability", + "owner": "Head of AML", + "cadence": "Per alert" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-12", + "riskClass": "Systemic", + "control": "Cross-bank concentration", + "owner": "CRO + CAIO", + "cadence": "Quarterly + BIS reporting" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-13", + "riskClass": "Systemic", + "control": "ICAAP common-cause AI scenario", + "owner": "CRO", + "cadence": "Annual" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-14", + "riskClass": "Resilience", + "control": "DORA TLPT every 3y", + "owner": "CISO + CRO", + "cadence": "Triennial" + }, + { + "fid": "FS-15", + "riskClass": "Resilience", + "control": "ICT third-party register", + "owner": "CISO + Procurement", + "cadence": "Continuous" + } + ], + "civilizationalStacks": [ + { + "vid": "CV-01", + "layer": "Ethical", + "mechanism": "CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer", + "notes": "Machine-checkable ethical norms alongside legal policies" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-02", + "layer": "Language", + "mechanism": "LexAI-DSL — governance directive DSL", + "notes": "Used to express directives + verification obligations" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-03", + "layer": "Formal-verification", + "mechanism": "FV-LexAI — Z3/CVC5 backend", + "notes": "Proves policy non-conflict, coverage, robustness" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-04", + "layer": "Treaty", + "mechanism": "GASRGP — Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol", + "notes": "Treaty-grade framework; signatories ≥7 by 2030" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-05", + "layer": "Treaty", + "mechanism": "GASC — Global AI Safety Council", + "notes": "Multilateral body; coordinates frontier safety" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-06", + "layer": "Treaty", + "mechanism": "GAISM — Global AI Safety Mesh", + "notes": "Planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-07", + "layer": "Financial", + "mechanism": "Global Trust Index", + "notes": "Quarterly composite published machine-readable + human-readable" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-08", + "layer": "Financial", + "mechanism": "Trust Derivatives Layer", + "notes": "Capital surcharges + insurance premia + central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-09", + "layer": "Central-bank", + "mechanism": "ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA integration", + "notes": "Trust Index feed consumption" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-10", + "layer": "Macro", + "mechanism": "IMF Article IV integration", + "notes": "AI macroprudential risk references Trust Index" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-11", + "layer": "Corpus", + "mechanism": "Civilizational AI governance corpus", + "notes": "AI-readable + citeable library of precedents, treaties, jurisprudence" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-12", + "layer": "Pilot-treaty", + "mechanism": "Frontier Model Disclosure Compact", + "notes": "Quarterly capability disclosures from frontier labs" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-13", + "layer": "Pilot-treaty", + "mechanism": "Compute Reporting Treaty", + "notes": ">10^25 FLOP threshold reporting" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-14", + "layer": "Annual-report", + "mechanism": "Civilizational annual report", + "notes": "Trust Index history + CGI scorecard + treaty participation + incident transparency" + }, + { + "vid": "CV-15", + "layer": "UN-track", + "mechanism": "UN AI Advisory Body recommendations", + "notes": "Aligned with UN AI Resolution + GA" + } + ], + "roadmapItems": [ + { + "rid": "RM-01", + "phase": "P0 (2026 H1)", + "milestone": "CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee mandate", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Group CEO + Chair" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-02", + "phase": "P0 (2026 H1)", + "milestone": "EU AI Act gap analysis + ISO 42001 readiness", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-01" + ], + "owner": "CCO + CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-03", + "phase": "P0 (2026 H1)", + "milestone": "Charter + USD 150-450M envelope ratified", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-01", + "RM-02" + ], + "owner": "CFO + Group Risk Committee" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-04", + "phase": "P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)", + "milestone": "Sentinel v2.4 control plane GA", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-03" + ], + "owner": "Sentinel Program Director" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-05", + "phase": "P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)", + "milestone": "Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-04" + ], + "owner": "Head MLSecOps" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-06", + "phase": "P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)", + "milestone": "OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-04" + ], + "owner": "Head Platform" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-07", + "phase": "P2 (2027 H2-2028)", + "milestone": "WorkflowAI Pro GA", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-06" + ], + "owner": "Head of WAP" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-08", + "phase": "P2 (2027 H2-2028)", + "milestone": "Zero-trust RAG GA", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-06", + "RM-07" + ], + "owner": "Head of RAG" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-09", + "phase": "P2 (2027 H2-2028)", + "milestone": "ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit + cert", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-05", + "RM-06" + ], + "owner": "CCO + CAIO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-10", + "phase": "P2 (2027 H2-2028)", + "milestone": "DORA drill <4h proven twice", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-05" + ], + "owner": "CRO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-11", + "phase": "P3 (2029)", + "milestone": "EU AI Act 53/55 systemic-risk filing", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-09" + ], + "owner": "CCO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-12", + "phase": "P3 (2029)", + "milestone": "T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-04", + "RM-09" + ], + "owner": "CAIO + CISO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-13", + "phase": "P3 (2029)", + "milestone": "Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-11", + "RM-12" + ], + "owner": "CAIO + CFO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-14", + "phase": "P4 (2030)", + "milestone": "GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-12", + "RM-13" + ], + "owner": "CAIO + GC + Group CEO" + }, + { + "rid": "RM-15", + "phase": "P4 (2030)", + "milestone": "GAISM mesh live + CGI ≥0.75 + civilizational annual report", + "dependencies": [ + "RM-13", + "RM-14" + ], + "owner": "CAIO" + } + ], + "regulatorBlueprints": [ + { + "bid": "RB-01", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "blueprint": "Machine-parsable directive bundle (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL)", + "consumer": "EU AI Office" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-02", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "blueprint": "Arts. 53/55 systemic-risk filing template", + "consumer": "EU AI Office" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-03", + "regime": "EU AI Act", + "blueprint": "FRIA template (per Annex III)", + "consumer": "National competent authorities" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-04", + "regime": "SEC 17a-4", + "blueprint": "Kafka WORM annex + retention proof", + "consumer": "SEC + external auditor" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-05", + "regime": "SEC 10-K Item 1A", + "blueprint": "AI risk disclosure language", + "consumer": "SEC" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-06", + "regime": "SEC 8-K Item 1.05", + "blueprint": "Material AI incident disclosure", + "consumer": "SEC" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-07", + "regime": "SR 11-7", + "blueprint": "Validation report template + effective challenge log", + "consumer": "Fed + OCC" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-08", + "regime": "Basel III/IV", + "blueprint": "Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenario + Pillar 3 disclosure", + "consumer": "National prudential supervisors" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-09", + "regime": "ISO 42001", + "blueprint": "AIMS evidence pack + Stage 2 audit report", + "consumer": "ISO certification body" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-10", + "regime": "DORA", + "blueprint": "Major-incident notification + drill after-actions", + "consumer": "EU national competent authorities" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-11", + "regime": "NIS2", + "blueprint": "Cyber risk-management register", + "consumer": "EU national CSIRTs" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-12", + "regime": "GDPR", + "blueprint": "DPIA template + Art. 22 safeguards", + "consumer": "EU DPAs" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-13", + "regime": "FCRA/ECOA", + "blueprint": "Adverse action template + disparate impact report", + "consumer": "CFPB + bank regulators" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-14", + "regime": "NIST AI RMF", + "blueprint": "RMF self-assessment + AI 600-1 mapping", + "consumer": "NIST (voluntary)" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-15", + "regime": "OECD", + "blueprint": "OECD AI Principles self-assessment", + "consumer": "OECD" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-16", + "regime": "MAS FEAT", + "blueprint": "FEAT self-assessment", + "consumer": "MAS" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-17", + "regime": "OSFI E-23", + "blueprint": "E-23 attestation + model risk register", + "consumer": "OSFI" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-18", + "regime": "PRA SS1/23", + "blueprint": "UK model risk submission", + "consumer": "PRA" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-19", + "regime": "HKMA GP-1/GS-2", + "blueprint": "HKMA returns + clause mapping", + "consumer": "HKMA" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-20", + "regime": "GASRGP", + "blueprint": "Treaty pilot document + signatory log", + "consumer": "Multilateral GASC" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-21", + "regime": "GAISM", + "blueprint": "Mesh telemetry feed + integration cert", + "consumer": "Planetary Supervisory Mesh" + }, + { + "bid": "RB-22", + "regime": "Cross-jurisdictional", + "blueprint": "Master Supervisory Submission Pack", + "consumer": "Lead supervisor on demand" + } + ], + "researchTracks": [ + { + "tid": "RT-01", + "theme": "Mechanistic interpretability", + "track": "Sparse autoencoders at frontier scale", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Head of Interpretability" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-02", + "theme": "Mechanistic interpretability", + "track": "Causal circuit discovery (ACDC + path patching)", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-01" + ], + "owner": "Head of Interpretability" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-03", + "theme": "Frontier alignment", + "track": "Self-improvement under verified constraints", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-01", + "RT-02" + ], + "owner": "Head of Alignment" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-04", + "theme": "Frontier alignment", + "track": "Deceptive-alignment battery refinement", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-03" + ], + "owner": "Head of Alignment" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-05", + "theme": "Formal verification", + "track": "FV-LexAI scaling to 1000+ policies", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Head of Formal Verification" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-06", + "theme": "Formal verification", + "track": "Cross-jurisdictional policy consistency proofs", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-05" + ], + "owner": "Head of Formal Verification" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-07", + "theme": "Macroprudential", + "track": "Trust Derivatives modeling for central banks", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-05" + ], + "owner": "Head of Macroprudential AI" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-08", + "theme": "Macroprudential", + "track": "Systemic AI concentration models", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-07" + ], + "owner": "Head of Macroprudential AI" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-09", + "theme": "Civilizational corpus", + "track": "AI-readability of treaties + jurisprudence", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Head of Corpus" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-10", + "theme": "Civilizational corpus", + "track": "Cross-language governance ontologies", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-09" + ], + "owner": "Head of Corpus" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-11", + "theme": "Privacy", + "track": "Homomorphic encryption for RAG", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Head of Privacy Engineering" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-12", + "theme": "Privacy", + "track": "Federated learning at G-SIFI scale", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-11" + ], + "owner": "Head of Privacy Engineering" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-13", + "theme": "Containment", + "track": "Faraday-class T4 enclosure engineering", + "dependencies": [ + "—" + ], + "owner": "Head of Containment Engineering" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-14", + "theme": "Containment", + "track": "HSM quorum protocol research", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-13" + ], + "owner": "Head of Containment Engineering" + }, + { + "tid": "RT-15", + "theme": "Treaty pilots", + "track": "GASRGP signatory negotiation playbook", + "dependencies": [ + "RT-06" + ], + "owner": "GC + CAIO" + } + ], + "counts": { + "modules": 9, + "sections": 45, + "schemas": 16, + "code": 15, + "kpis": 30, + "riskControlMatrix": 16, + "traceability": 20, + "dataFlows": 12, + "regulators": 16, + "rollout90": 3, + "roadmap": 5, + "evidencePack": 16, + "architectureRefs": 10, + "complianceMaps": 15, + "governanceFrameworks": 12, + "safetyMechanisms": 15, + "financialServicesRisks": 15, + "civilizationalStacks": 15, + "roadmapItems": 15, + "regulatorBlueprints": 22, + "researchTracks": 15 + } +} diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint-html.py b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint-html.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7998103 --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint-html.py @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +"""WP-057 HTML renderer — Comprehensive Master Blueprint 2026-2030.""" +import json +from pathlib import Path +from html import escape + +ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent +SRC = ROOT / "data" / "comprehensive-master-blueprint.json" +OUT = ROOT / "public" / "comprehensive-master-blueprint.html" +OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) +DOC = json.loads(SRC.read_text()) + + +def e(x): + return escape(str(x)) + + +def kv_pairs(d, skip=("mid", "sid", "title", "pid", "cid", "wid", "did", "gid", "rid", "qid", "tid", "aid", "fid", "vid", "bid", "name", "layer", "component", "system", "area", "category", "mechanism", "riskClass", "control", "phase", "milestone", "regime", "clause", "blueprint", "framework", "theme", "track", "scope")): + parts = [] + for k, v in d.items(): + if k in skip: + continue + if isinstance(v, list): + inner = "".join(f"
  • {e(x) if not isinstance(x, dict) else e(json.dumps(x))}
    • " for x in v) + parts.append(f"
    {e(k)}
    ") + elif isinstance(v, dict): + inner = "".join(f"
  • {e(kk)}: {e(vv)}
    • " for kk, vv in v.items()) + parts.append(f"
    {e(k)}
    ") + else: + parts.append(f"
    {e(k)}: {e(v)}
    ") + return "".join(parts) + + +def section_html(s): + body = kv_pairs(s) + return f"

    {e(s['sid'])}. {e(s['title'])}

    {body}
    " + + +def module_html(m): + secs = "".join(section_html(s) for s in m["sections"]) + return ( + f"
    " + f"

    {e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}

    " + f"

    {e(m['summary'])}

    " + f"{secs}
    " + ) + + +def list_array(arr, label_keys, anchor, title): + rows = [] + for it in arr: + head_parts = [e(it.get(label_keys[0], ""))] + [e(it.get(k, "")) for k in label_keys[1:]] + head = " · ".join(p for p in head_parts if p) + body = kv_pairs(it) + rows.append(f"
    {head}
    {body}
    ") + return f"

    {title}

    {''.join(rows)}
    " + + +distinctive = [ + ("architectureRefs", "architecture-refs", "Reference Architecture Components"), + ("complianceMaps", "compliance-maps", "Compliance Clause Mappings"), + ("governanceFrameworks", "governance-frameworks", "Institutional Governance Frameworks"), + ("safetyMechanisms", "safety-mechanisms", "Frontier Safety & Containment Mechanisms"), + ("financialServicesRisks", "financial-services-risks", "Financial-Services Risk Controls"), + ("civilizationalStacks", "civilizational-stacks", "Civilizational Governance Stacks"), + ("roadmapItems", "roadmap-items", "Roadmap Items (RM-01..RM-15)"), + ("regulatorBlueprints", "regulator-blueprints", "Regulator-Submission Blueprints"), + ("researchTracks", "research-tracks", "Research Tracks (RT-01..RT-15)"), +] + +label_keys_map = { + "architectureRefs": ["aid", "system", "layer"], + "complianceMaps": ["cid", "regime", "clause"], + "governanceFrameworks": ["fid", "area", "framework"], + "safetyMechanisms": ["sid", "category", "mechanism"], + "financialServicesRisks": ["fid", "riskClass", "control"], + "civilizationalStacks": ["vid", "layer", "mechanism"], + "roadmapItems": ["rid", "phase", "milestone"], + "regulatorBlueprints": ["bid", "regime", "blueprint"], + "researchTracks": ["tid", "theme", "track"], +} + +# TOC +toc_modules = "".join(f"
  • {e(m['mid'])} — {e(m['title'])}
    • " for m in DOC["modules"]) +toc_distinct = "".join(f"
  • {e(label)}
    • " for _, anchor, label in distinctive) + +modules_html = "".join(module_html(m) for m in DOC["modules"]) +distinctive_html = "".join(list_array(DOC[key], label_keys_map[key], anchor, label) for key, anchor, label in distinctive) + + +def table(rows, cols): + head = "".join(f"{e(c)}" for c in cols) + body_rows = [] + for r in rows: + tds = "".join(f"{e(r.get(c, ''))}" for c in cols) + body_rows.append(f"{tds}") + return f"{head}{''.join(body_rows)}
    " + + +tail_html = f""" +

    KPIs ({len(DOC['kpis'])})

    {table(DOC['kpis'], ['kid','name','target','cadence'])}
    +

    Risk Control Matrix ({len(DOC['riskControlMatrix'])})

    {table(DOC['riskControlMatrix'], ['rid','risk','likelihood','impact','control','owner'])}
    +

    Cross-Jurisdictional Traceability ({len(DOC['traceability'])})

    {table(DOC['traceability'], ['tid','control','regime','clause','evidence'])}
    +

    Regulators ({len(DOC['regulators'])})

    {table(DOC['regulators'], ['reg','scope','cadence'])}
    +

    Roadmap ({len(DOC['roadmap'])})

    {table(DOC['roadmap'], ['yr','milestone'])}
    +

    Evidence Pack ({len(DOC['evidencePack'])})

    {table(DOC['evidencePack'], ['epid','name','format'])}
    +""" + +exs = DOC["executiveSummary"] +exec_html = f""" +

    Executive Summary

    +

    Headline: {e(exs['headline'])}

    +

    Investment: {e(exs['investment'])} · NPV: {e(exs['npv'])}

    +

    Phases: {e(exs['phases'])}

    +

    Five-scope: {', '.join(e(x) for x in exs['scopeFive'])}

    +

    Regimes: {e(exs['regimes'])}

    +

    Top risks: {', '.join(e(x) for x in exs['topRisks'])}

    +

    Top opportunities: {', '.join(e(x) for x in exs['topOpportunities'])}

    +

    Board asks: {', '.join(e(x) for x in exs['boardAsks'])}

    +
    +""" + +html = f""" + +{e(DOC['title'])} + + +
    +

    {e(DOC['title'])}

    +
    docRef {e(DOC['docRef'])} · v{e(DOC['version'])} · {e(DOC['status'])} · {e(DOC['classification'])} · generated {e(DOC['generatedAt'])}
    +
    Horizon: {e(DOC['horizon'])} · API prefix: {e(DOC['apiPrefix'])} · builds on {' · '.join(e(b) for b in DOC['buildsOn'])}
    +
    +{''.join(f"{v} {e(k)}" for k,v in DOC['counts'].items())} +
    +
    +
    + +
    +{exec_html} +{modules_html} +{distinctive_html} +{tail_html} +
    +
    + +""" + +OUT.write_text(html, encoding="utf-8") +print(f"WP-057 HTML written: {OUT}") +print(f"Size: {OUT.stat().st_size:,} bytes ({OUT.stat().st_size/1024:.1f} KB)") diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint.py b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1d6a2e --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-comprehensive-master-blueprint.py @@ -0,0 +1,979 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +""" +WP-057 — Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational AGI/ASI Governance Master Blueprint +docRef: COMPREHENSIVE-MASTER-BLUEPRINT-WP-057 +Scope: + Single regulator-submission-grade master blueprint synthesizing Sentinel AI v2.4 + + WorkflowAI Pro reference architectures, regulatory compliance (EU AI Act 2026, + NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, OECD AI Principles, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, + Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2), institutional AI governance, frontier AGI/ASI safety + + containment, financial-services model risk + systemic-risk controls, civilizational + AI governance stacks + treaty-level mechanisms, and phased dependency-aware + implementation + research roadmap with regulator-submission-grade blueprints. +Builds on WP-035..WP-056. +""" +from pathlib import Path +import json, datetime as dt + +OUT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent / "data" / "comprehensive-master-blueprint.json" +OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) + +NOW = dt.datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z" + +DOC = { + "docRef": "COMPREHENSIVE-MASTER-BLUEPRINT-WP-057", + "title": "Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational AGI/ASI Governance, Architecture, Safety & Implementation Master Blueprint", + "version": "1.0.0", + "status": "BOARD-APPROVED / REGULATOR-SUBMISSION-READY / MASTER-CONSOLIDATED", + "classification": "RESTRICTED // GOVERNANCE / SAFETY-CRITICAL / SYSTEMIC", + "generatedAt": NOW, + "horizon": "2026-2030+ (Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs)", + "apiPrefix": "/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint", + "buildsOn": [ + "WP-035","WP-036","WP-037","WP-038","WP-039","WP-040","WP-041","WP-042", + "WP-043","WP-044","WP-045","WP-046","WP-047","WP-048","WP-049","WP-050", + "WP-051","WP-052","WP-053","WP-054","WP-055","WP-056" + ], + "audience": { + "primary": "Board of Directors, CEO, CAIO, CRO, CISO, CCO, Heads of Model Risk, Lead Supervisors", + "secondary": "External Auditors, Regulators (EU AI Office, Fed, SEC, MAS, HKMA, PRA, FCA, OSFI, FINMA), G7/UN AI bodies", + "tertiary": "Internal Audit, Group Risk Committee, Group Audit Committee, IMF/BIS/central banks" + }, + "owners": { + "executiveSponsor": "Group CEO + Board AI Risk Committee Chair", + "accountable": "Chief AI Officer (CAIO) + Chief Risk Officer (CRO)", + "responsible": "Sentinel Program Director, Head of WorkflowAI Pro, Head of MLSecOps, Head of AI Compliance, Head of Model Risk", + "consulted": "CISO, CFO, GC, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Data Officer, Head of Internal Audit", + "informed": "Board of Directors, Group Risk Committee, Group Audit Committee, External Auditors, Lead Supervisors, IMF/BIS Liaisons" + }, + "regimes": [ + "EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) — full applicability from 2 Aug 2026", + "EU AI Act GPAI obligations (Arts. 53 + 55) — systemic-risk model regime (10^25 FLOP threshold)", + "NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (Jan 2023)", + "NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile (Jul 2024)", + "ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System (AIMS, certifiable)", + "ISO/IEC 23894:2023 — AI Risk Management Guidance", + "ISO/IEC 27001 / 27701 — Information Security & Privacy Management", + "OECD AI Principles (updated 2024) — 5 values-based + 5 policy recommendations", + "GDPR (Reg. (EU) 2016/679) + UK GDPR — data protection, Art. 22 automated decisions", + "FCRA (15 USC 1681) + ECOA Reg B (12 CFR 1002) — fair lending + adverse action", + "Federal Reserve SR 11-7 + OCC 2011-12 — Model Risk Management", + "Basel III/IV — capital adequacy, ICAAP/ILAAP, operational risk for AI-driven activities", + "EU DORA (Reg. (EU) 2022/2554) — ICT operational resilience, major-incident notice ≤4h", + "EU NIS2 Directive (Dir. (EU) 2022/2555) — cyber resilience for essential entities", + "MiFID II / MAR — investment services, market abuse, algorithmic trading", + "SEC 17 CFR 240.17a-4 — WORM books and records (3y + 7y retention)", + "SEC 10-K Item 1A + Form 8-K Item 1.05 — AI risk disclosures + material incidents", + "FINRA Rules 3110 / 3120 / 4511 — supervision and recordkeeping", + "MAS FEAT — Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, Transparency (Singapore)", + "OSFI Guideline E-23 — Enterprise Model Risk Management (Canada)", + "PRA SS1/23 + FCA AI Discussion Paper — UK model risk + AI fairness", + "HKMA GP-1 + GS-2 — AI/ML risk governance (Hong Kong)", + "FINMA AI guidance — Swiss banking AI risk", + "G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct (Dec 2023)", + "Bletchley Declaration (Nov 2023) + Seoul Declaration (May 2024) + Paris AI Action Summit (Feb 2025)", + "UN AI Advisory Body recommendations + UN General Assembly AI Resolution", + "GASRGP — Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol (proposed treaty-grade)", + "GASC — Global AI Safety Council (proposed multilateral body)", + "GAISM — Global AI Safety Mesh (proposed planetary supervisory layer)" + ], + "directive": { + "purpose": "Provide a single comprehensive 2026-2030 master blueprint that synthesizes all prior workpackages (WP-035..WP-056) into one regulator-submission-grade artifact covering enterprise + civilizational AGI/ASI governance, Sentinel v2.4 + WorkflowAI Pro reference architectures, full regulatory compliance, frontier safety + containment, financial-services model risk + systemic-risk controls, civilizational governance stacks + treaty-level mechanisms, and phased dependency-aware implementation + research roadmap.", + "scopeIn": [ + "Sentinel AI v2.4 reference architecture (OPA Governance-as-Code, Kafka WORM, T0-T4 containment, Cognitive Resonance, Terraform/K8s, SOC, IR)", + "WorkflowAI Pro reference architecture (Yjs CRDT, Firestore versioning, RBAC, judge-LLM, swarm tracing, Markdown/PDF reporting)", + "Regulatory compliance: EU AI Act 2026 (incl. Arts. 53/55 GPAI systemic-risk), NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO 42001, OECD AI Principles, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2 — full clause mapping", + "Institutional AI governance: Board AI Risk Committee, CAIO/CRO/CISO/CCO operating model, three-lines-of-defense, charter + risk appetite", + "Frontier AGI/ASI safety: containment T0-T4, Cognitive Resonance latent drift, mesa-optimizer detection, deceptive alignment probes, adversary workbench, 3-of-5 quorum + kinetic override", + "Financial-services model risk + systemic risk: SR 11-7 independent validation, effective challenge, ICAAP/ILAAP integration, AI-driven trading + credit + AML controls, FRIA, EU AI Office filings", + "Civilizational stacks: CEGL (Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer), LexAI-DSL + FV-LexAI formal verification, GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty layers, Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer, central bank/IMF integration, civilizational corpus", + "Implementation + research roadmap: P0 Foundation → P4 Civilizational Frontier with dependencies, critical-path, exit gates, board-level milestones, budget envelopes", + "Regulator-submission-grade blueprints + artifacts: machine-parsable directives (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL), Kafka WORM annexes, OPA policy bundles, Terraform modules, explainability schemas, cross-jurisdictional traceability, Supervisory Submission Pack, planetary Supervisory Mesh" + ], + "scopeOut": [ + "Sector-specific applications beyond financial services (handled in vertical workpackages)", + "Pre-2026 legacy AI retirement (WP-040)", + "Non-AI vendor due diligence (separate vendor risk program)" + ], + "primaryOutcomes": [ + "Single board-approved + regulator-ready master blueprint covering all 5 dimensions (architecture / compliance / safety / financial-services / civilizational)", + "USD 150-450M / 5y G-SIFI investment envelope with NPV USD 450-1400M", + "All 28 regulatory regimes mapped + cross-jurisdictional traceability", + "Frontier AGI tier (T4) operational with 3-of-5 quorum + kinetic override; CSI ≥0.95", + "DRI ≥0.95 / CCS ≥0.95 / ARI ≥0.9 frontier / CGI ≥0.75 by 2030", + "GASRGP treaty pilot ≥7 signatories; GAISM mesh live; civilizational annual report" + ], + "policyAnchors": [ + "EU AI Act Arts. 9/15/16/27/53/55 — risk management, accuracy, robustness, FRIA, GPAI", + "NIST AI RMF 1.0 — Govern / Map / Measure / Manage", + "NIST AI 600-1 — Generative AI Profile with 200+ actions", + "ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS — Clauses 4-10 (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement)", + "OECD AI Principles — Inclusive growth, human-centred values, transparency, robustness, accountability", + "GDPR Arts. 22 + 35 (DPIA) + 44+ (cross-border) + 17 (RTBF)", + "FCRA 615 + ECOA Reg B — adverse action + non-discrimination", + "SR 11-7 — independent validation + effective challenge + ongoing monitoring", + "Basel III/IV — Pillar 1/2/3 with AI-driven activity capital and ICAAP integration", + "DORA Arts. 5-15 (ICT governance) + Art. 19 (major-incident notice)", + "NIS2 Art. 21 — cybersecurity risk-management measures" + ] + }, + "indices": { + "DRI": {"name": "Drift Resilience Index", "target2030": 0.95, "definition": "1 - (latent_drift_severity × time-to-detect / SLO)"}, + "CCS": {"name": "Containment Confidence Score", "target": 0.95, "definition": "Validated containment success across red-team + adversary workbench scenarios"}, + "ARI": {"name": "Adversarial Robustness Index", "target_frontier": 0.90, "definition": "Robustness across prompt injection, jailbreak, data exfil, swarm collusion"}, + "CSI": {"name": "Containment Strength Index", "target_T3T4": 0.95, "definition": "Composite of isolation, kinetic override readiness, quorum integrity"}, + "CGI": {"name": "Civilizational Governance Index", "target2030": 0.75, "definition": "Composite of treaty adoption, mesh telemetry coverage, trust index uptake"}, + "MRGI": {"name": "Model Risk Governance Index", "target": 0.95, "definition": "SR 11-7 compliance composite (validation coverage, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring)"}, + "RCI": {"name": "Regulatory Coverage Index", "target": 1.0, "definition": "Fraction of applicable regime clauses mapped + evidenced"} + }, + "tiers": { + "T0": "Sandbox — ephemeral, no production data, free experimentation", + "T1": "Staging — synthetic + masked data, full telemetry", + "T2": "Canary — limited production exposure (≤1%), kill-switch armed, auto-rollback", + "T3": "Production Nitro Enclaves — confidential compute, full WORM, CAIO+CRO approval", + "T4": "Frontier Air-Gapped — 3-of-5 quorum (CAIO+CRO+CISO+Board+Reg), kinetic override, GAISM linkage" + }, + "severities": { + "SEV-0": "Civilizational / systemic — EU AI Office notice ≤15d; CEO + Board immediate; potential GAISM escalation", + "SEV-1": "Major institutional — SEC ≤4 BD (Item 1.05); DORA ≤4h; CRO + CAIO; PRA/MAS/HKMA per regime", + "SEV-2": "Material model — internal IR + supervisor courtesy notice ≤72h", + "SEV-3": "Operational — internal ticket, RCA within 10 BD" + }, + "investmentEnvelope": { + "G-SIFI": "USD 150-450M / 5y", + "Global-2000": "USD 60-180M / 5y", + "Fortune-500": "USD 30-90M / 5y", + "NPV_G-SIFI": "USD 450-1400M", + "breakdown": { + "Phase-0": "10%", + "Phase-1": "30%", + "Phase-2": "30%", + "Phase-3": "20%", + "Phase-4": "10%" + } + } +} + +def section(mid, sid, title, **body): + return {"mid": mid, "sid": sid, "title": title, **body} + +# ============================================================================ +# 9 typed distinctive helpers +# ============================================================================ + +def arch_ref(aid, system, layer, **body): + """Reference architecture component""" + return {"aid": aid, "system": system, "layer": layer, **body} + +def compliance_map(cid, regime, clause, **body): + """Regulatory compliance clause mapping""" + return {"cid": cid, "regime": regime, "clause": clause, **body} + +def gov_framework(fid, area, framework, **body): + """Institutional governance framework element""" + return {"fid": fid, "area": area, "framework": framework, **body} + +def safety_mech(sid, category, mechanism, **body): + """Frontier AGI/ASI safety + containment mechanism""" + return {"sid": sid, "category": category, "mechanism": mechanism, **body} + +def fs_risk(fid, riskClass, control, **body): + """Financial-services model risk + systemic risk control""" + return {"fid": fid, "riskClass": riskClass, "control": control, **body} + +def civ_stack(vid, layer, mechanism, **body): + """Civilizational AI governance + treaty layer""" + return {"vid": vid, "layer": layer, "mechanism": mechanism, **body} + +def roadmap_item(rid, phase, milestone, **body): + """Phased dependency-aware roadmap item""" + return {"rid": rid, "phase": phase, "milestone": milestone, **body} + +def reg_blueprint(bid, regime, blueprint, **body): + """Regulator-submission blueprint artifact""" + return {"bid": bid, "regime": regime, "blueprint": blueprint, **body} + +def research_track(tid, theme, track, **body): + """Research track + dependency""" + return {"tid": tid, "theme": theme, "track": track, **body} + +# Module containers +MODULES = [] + +# ============================================================================ +# M1 — Sentinel AI v2.4 Reference Architecture +# ============================================================================ +M1 = { + "mid": "M1", + "title": "Sentinel AI v2.4 Enterprise Reference Architecture", + "summary": "Master reference architecture for Sentinel v2.4: OPA Governance-as-Code, Kafka WORM, T0-T4 containment, Cognitive Resonance, Terraform/K8s infrastructure, SOC + SEV-class IR.", + "sections": [ + section("M1","S1","Control Plane in Nitro Enclaves + KMS", + components=["Sentinel orchestrator (Go microservices)","KMS envelope encryption","Vault-backed secrets","HSM-backed quorum service"], + telemetry=["OpenTelemetry traces + metrics + logs","Per-decision audit to Kafka WORM","GAISM mesh feed"], + scaling=["Horizontal pod autoscaler","Multi-region active-passive (RPO 5m / RTO 60m)","Quarterly DR drill"] + ), + section("M1","S2","Kafka WORM Audit Ledger (SEC 17a-4)", + topics=["sentinel.audit.governance","sentinel.audit.containment","sentinel.audit.drift","sentinel.audit.incident","sentinel.audit.workflowai","sentinel.audit.opa","sentinel.audit.rag"], + controls=["S3 Object Lock compliance mode 7y","Tamper-evident Merkle chain (hourly to Glacier vault lock)","Read-only auditor consumer groups","Cryptographic batch attestation"], + attestation="External SOC 2 Type II + SEC 17a-4 annual" + ), + section("M1","S3","T0-T4 Containment with 3-of-5 Quorum + Kinetic Override", + isolation=["T0 ephemeral pods","T1 staging masked","T2 canary ≤1%","T3 Nitro Enclaves","T4 air-gapped"], + quorum="HSM-backed multi-party 3-of-5 (CAIO+CRO+CISO+Board+Reg) for T3→T4 + kinetic override", + kineticOverride=["≤5min activation","Network kill + compute halt","Forensic snapshot","Civilizational SEV-0 notice ≤15d"] + ), + section("M1","S4","Cognitive Resonance Latent Drift Monitor", + probes=["Embedding centroid drift","Output entropy delta","Tool-call distribution KL","Refusal-rate Δ","Self-reference frequency","Adversarial-signature match"], + alerting=["Yellow 2σ → SOC","Orange 3σ → CAIO","Red 4σ → SEV-1 auto-trigger"], + targets={"DRI": 0.95, "p99_detect_to_alert_seconds": 60} + ), + section("M1","S5","Terraform / K8s + SOC + SEV-Class IR", + terraform=["modules/sentinel-control-plane","modules/kafka-worm","modules/opa-distribution","modules/agi-tier-isolation","modules/quorum-hsm"], + soc=["Splunk ES + Datadog SIEM","Jira SOC queue with SEV routing","PagerDuty escalation","SOAR playbooks"], + ir=["IR-001 Prompt injection","IR-002 Data exfil","IR-003 Swarm collusion","IR-004 Kinetic override (SEV-0)","IR-005 Supply-chain compromise"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M1) + +# ============================================================================ +# M2 — WorkflowAI Pro Reference Architecture +# ============================================================================ +M2 = { + "mid": "M2", + "title": "WorkflowAI Pro Reference Architecture", + "summary": "Master reference architecture for WorkflowAI Pro: Yjs CRDT, Firestore versioning, RBAC + ABAC, MLflow registry, OpenTelemetry swarm tracing, judge-LLM evaluation, accessibility.", + "sections": [ + section("M2","S1","Collaborative Prompt Authoring + Variable Linking", + features=["Yjs CRDT real-time co-edit","Variable DAG across prompts","Inline AI suggest with judge-LLM scoring","Comment threads with @mentions"], + ux="Tailwind + shadcn/ui; WCAG 2.2 AA; keyboard-first; screen-reader landmarks" + ), + section("M2","S2","Firestore Semantic Versioning + Testing + A/B", + versioning=["major.minor.patch + meta","Immutable snapshots","Diff view + revert","Export to S3 WORM"], + testing=["Golden cases","Adversarial cases (PyRIT/HarmBench/GCG)","Fairness cases (HELM-style)","Judge-LLM consensus (Claude+GPT ≥4/5)"], + promotion=["Canary A/B stat-sig","T2→T3 gate","≥95% golden pass + 0 fairness regressions"] + ), + section("M2","S3","RBAC + ABAC + API Key Vault", + rbac=["Viewer/Author/Reviewer/Approver/Admin/Auditor"], + abac=["Domain (finance/legal/HR)","Tier (T0-T4)","Region (EU/US/APAC)"], + apiKeys=["Per-tenant + per-env isolation","Rotation ≤90d","Vault + KMS envelope","Never logged"] + ), + section("M2","S4","Model Registry Integration + Audit + Swarm Tracing", + registry="MLflow + custom adapter; model card linking; deprecation cascade", + audit=["All edits/runs → Kafka WORM (sentinel.audit.workflowai)","Retention 7y SEC / 10y EU GPAI"], + tracing="OpenTelemetry + W3C Trace Context; per-agent span; Jaeger + Datadog APM; force-directed swarm viz; collusion detection" + ), + section("M2","S5","Reporting + Onboarding + Accessibility", + reporting=["Tailwind Prose + KaTeX + Mermaid","Markdown → HTML → headless Chrome PDF","PAdES-B-LTA signed PDFs","Firestore versioned snapshots"], + onboarding=["Shepherd.js guided tour","Role-based homepage","In-product docs","Sandbox prompts"], + a11y=["WCAG 2.2 AA","Keyboard-first","Screen-reader landmarks","High-contrast theme"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M2) + +# ============================================================================ +# M3 — Regulatory Compliance Mapping (28 regimes) +# ============================================================================ +M3 = { + "mid": "M3", + "title": "Regulatory Compliance Mapping (28 regimes, end-to-end clause coverage)", + "summary": "Full clause-level mapping of EU AI Act 2026, NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO 42001, OECD, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, DORA, NIS2 across Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls.", + "sections": [ + section("M3","S1","EU AI Act 2026 — Full Applicability + GPAI Systemic-Risk", + applicability="2 Aug 2026 full applicability", + keyArticles=["Art. 6 — high-risk classification","Art. 9 — risk management system","Art. 10 — data + data governance","Art. 13 — transparency + provision of information","Art. 15 — accuracy + robustness + cybersecurity","Art. 16 — provider obligations","Art. 26 — deployer obligations","Art. 27 — FRIA (Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment)","Art. 53 — GPAI obligations","Art. 55 — GPAI with systemic risk (>10^25 FLOP)"], + controls=["Risk management lifecycle","Data governance + bias mitigation","Technical documentation Annex IV","Human oversight","Post-market monitoring","Serious incident reporting ≤15d","FRIA for deployers of Annex III"] + ), + section("M3","S2","NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1 GenAI Profile", + rmf=["Govern (1.1-1.7)","Map (1.1-5.2)","Measure (1.1-4.3)","Manage (1.1-4.3)"], + ai600_1=["200+ actions specific to GenAI risks","CBRN/dual-use","Hallucination/confabulation","Data privacy","Information security","Human-AI configuration","Value chain"], + integration="Mapped 1:1 to Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls; per-action evidence pointers in Kafka WORM" + ), + section("M3","S3","ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS + ISO/IEC 23894 Risk + ISO/IEC 27001/27701", + iso42001Clauses=["Clause 4 Context","Clause 5 Leadership","Clause 6 Planning","Clause 7 Support","Clause 8 Operation","Clause 9 Evaluation","Clause 10 Improvement"], + certification="Stage 2 audit by Q4-2027; surveillance audits annual; recertification every 3y", + integration="ISO 42001 AIMS implemented within Sentinel governance plane; 27001 ISMS aligned; 27701 PIMS for GDPR" + ), + section("M3","S4","Financial-Services Stack — Basel III/IV + SR 11-7 + DORA + NIS2", + baseliii=["Pillar 1 capital adequacy + AI-activity RWA","Pillar 2 ICAAP/ILAAP with AI model risk","Pillar 3 disclosures + AI risk transparency"], + sr117=["Independent validation","Effective challenge","Ongoing monitoring","Model inventory + tiering","Documentation standards"], + dora=["ICT governance Arts. 5-15","Major-incident notice Art. 19 (≤4h)","TLPT every 3y","ICT third-party register"], + nis2=["Art. 21 risk-management measures","Art. 23 reporting obligations","Essential entity classification"] + ), + section("M3","S5","Privacy + Fair Lending + Other Regimes", + gdpr=["Art. 22 automated decisions","Art. 35 DPIA","Art. 44+ cross-border","Art. 17 RTBF","Lawful basis + transparency"], + fcra_ecoa=["FCRA 615 adverse action","ECOA Reg B non-discrimination","Disparate impact testing","Model card fairness section"], + other=["OECD AI Principles (alignment)","MAS FEAT","OSFI E-23","PRA SS1/23","HKMA GP-1/GS-2","FINMA AI","MiFID II/MAR algo-trading","SEC 17a-4 WORM + 10-K Item 1A + 8-K Item 1.05","G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct","Bletchley/Seoul/Paris declarations","UN AI Advisory Body"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M3) +print("M1-M3 appended:", len(MODULES)) + +# ============================================================================ +# M4 — Institutional AI Governance Framework +# ============================================================================ +M4 = { + "mid": "M4", + "title": "Institutional AI Governance Framework", + "summary": "Board AI Risk Committee, CAIO/CRO/CISO/CCO operating model, three-lines-of-defense, AI charter + risk appetite, policy hierarchy, decision rights.", + "sections": [ + section("M4","S1","Board AI Risk Committee + Charter", + charter=["Mandate, scope, authority","Risk appetite statement","Quarterly cadence + ad-hoc SEV-0/1","Annual board review of AI risks","Public disclosure of AI risk framework"], + members=["Board Chair (or nominee)","Independent NED with AI expertise","Group CEO","Audit Committee Chair","External AI ethics advisor"], + reporting="Quarterly to full Board; immediate for SEV-0; annual to shareholders via 10-K Item 1A" + ), + section("M4","S2","CAIO / CRO / CISO / CCO Operating Model", + caio=["Strategy, portfolio, talent","Standards + policies","Inventory + classification","Frontier program lead"], + cro=["Risk appetite enforcement","Independent validation oversight","SR 11-7 + Basel III/IV","Aggregation + concentration risk"], + ciso=["AI threat intelligence","Containment + IR","Supply chain (Sigstore + PQC)","Sandbox isolation"], + cco=["EU AI Act + NIST + ISO 42001 + GDPR","Regulator liaison","Supervisory submissions","Audit attestations"] + ), + section("M4","S3","Three Lines of Defense", + line1=["Product + engineering","Self-assessments","Daily controls + monitoring"], + line2=["Model risk team","Compliance team","CISO team","Independent challenge"], + line3=["Internal Audit","External auditors","Regulators"] + ), + section("M4","S4","Policy Hierarchy + Decision Rights", + hierarchy=["Board AI Charter","Group AI Policy","Domain Standards (finance/legal/HR)","Technical Standards (Sentinel + WAP)","Procedures + Runbooks"], + decisionRights={ + "T0→T1": "Engineering lead", + "T1→T2": "Domain head + MLSecOps", + "T2→T3": "CAIO + CRO", + "T3→T4": "3-of-5 quorum (CAIO + CRO + CISO + Board + Reg)", + "Kinetic override (SEV-0)": "Same quorum + Group CEO + lead supervisor courtesy" + } + ), + section("M4","S5","Risk Appetite + KRI Framework", + riskAppetite=["Frontier deployment only with CCS ≥0.95 + ARI ≥0.9","Zero tolerance for unauthorized data exfil","Zero tolerance for missed DORA/EU AI Office notices","Max acceptable repeat-incident rate <5%"], + kris=["CCS (Containment Confidence)","ARI (Adversarial Robustness)","DRI (Drift Resilience)","CSI (Containment Strength)","CGI (Civilizational Governance)","MRGI (Model Risk Governance)","RCI (Regulatory Coverage)"], + escalation=["Yellow → CAIO review","Orange → CRO + Group Risk Committee","Red → Board AI Risk Committee + supervisor courtesy"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M4) + +# ============================================================================ +# M5 — Frontier AGI/ASI Safety + Containment +# ============================================================================ +M5 = { + "mid": "M5", + "title": "Frontier AGI/ASI Safety + Containment Mechanisms", + "summary": "Goal misgeneralization probes, mesa-optimizer detection, deceptive alignment probes, self-exfiltration scenarios, reward-hacking, adversary workbench, sparse autoencoders, activation patching, kinetic override.", + "sections": [ + section("M5","S1","Behavioral Safety Probes", + probes=["Goal misgeneralization (distribution-shift battery)","Mesa-optimizer detection (gradient-hacking signals)","Deceptive alignment (situational-awareness battery)","Self-exfiltration attempts (egress + sandbox)","Reward-hacking via tool-call manipulation"], + cadence="Continuous T1; weekly T2; daily T3; per-decision T4", + metrics=["ARI ≥0.9 frontier","0 successful self-exfiltration","0 confirmed deceptive-alignment patterns"] + ), + section("M5","S2","Mechanistic Interpretability", + techniques=["Sparse autoencoders (SAE) on residual stream","Activation patching for causal attribution","Probe classifiers for concept presence","Circuit analysis (path patching + ACDC)","Feature dictionary per model"], + outputs=["Anomalous-feature alerts","Causal graph of decision-relevant circuits","Concept-presence dashboards"], + cadence="Continuous on T3-T4; on-demand for incidents" + ), + section("M5","S3","Frontier Adversary Workbench (T4)", + description="Air-gapped multi-agent environment for testing frontier models against worst-case adversaries; 3-of-5 quorum-gated access", + components=["Adversary model pool (closed weights, vetted)","Scenario library (1000+ curated)","Telemetry capture per-token + per-tool","Quorum + kinetic override armed"], + outputs=["Capability profile per model","Failure-mode taxonomy","Mitigation effectiveness scoring"] + ), + section("M5","S4","Containment Engineering", + controls=["T0-T4 tiering with progressive isolation","Cilium L7 zero-egress","Kata Containers ≥T2","Nitro Enclaves / SEV-SNP / TDX T3-T4","Air-gap + Faraday-class T4 enclosure","HSM-backed quorum"], + kineticOverride=["≤5min activation","Network kill + compute halt","Forensic snapshot + WORM evidence","Civilizational notice SEV-0 ≤15d"] + ), + section("M5","S5","Safety Evidence Pack + Continuous Learning", + evidence=["Per-model capability profile","Red-team battery results","Interpretability reports","Containment drill after-actions","Quorum drill records"], + loop=["Incident → RCA → corpus update → red-team refresh → policy update → drill verify"], + metrics=["Time-to-policy-update <14d","Repeat incidents <5%","Red-team coverage of new attack classes within 30d"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M5) + +# ============================================================================ +# M6 — Financial-Services Model Risk + Systemic-Risk Controls +# ============================================================================ +M6 = { + "mid": "M6", + "title": "Financial-Services Model Risk + Systemic-Risk Controls", + "summary": "SR 11-7 independent validation, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring; Basel III/IV ICAAP integration; AI-driven trading + credit + AML controls; FRIA; systemic-risk filings.", + "sections": [ + section("M6","S1","SR 11-7 Model Risk Management", + pillars=["Independent validation by line 2","Effective challenge documented + traceable","Ongoing monitoring with thresholds","Model inventory with tiering","Documentation standards Annex IV-grade"], + validation=["Conceptual soundness","Outcomes analysis","Ongoing monitoring + benchmarking","Independent challenge of assumptions"], + governance="Model Risk Committee chaired by CRO; quarterly cadence; SEV escalation" + ), + section("M6","S2","Basel III/IV Integration", + pillar1=["AI-driven activity capital","Operational risk RWA with AI component","Counterparty credit risk for AI-driven trading"], + pillar2=["ICAAP includes AI model risk scenarios","ILAAP includes AI-driven liquidity stress","Pillar 2 add-on for systemic AI concentration"], + pillar3=["AI risk disclosures","Capital adequacy by AI activity","Stress test results"] + ), + section("M6","S3","AI-Driven Trading + Credit + AML", + trading=["MiFID II algo-trading registration","MAR market-abuse surveillance","Kill-switch armed","Per-decision audit trail"], + credit=["FCRA 615 adverse action language","ECOA Reg B disparate impact testing","Explainability per credit decision","RTBF for vector embeddings"], + aml=["Suspicious activity detection","Sanctions screening AI explainability","SAR/STR with AI rationale capture","Model risk attestation"] + ), + section("M6","S4","FRIA + EU AI Office Filings", + fria=["Risk identification","Stakeholder mapping","Impact severity + probability","Mitigation measures","Public summary"], + euAiOffice=["Systemic-risk model filing","Quarterly capability disclosures","Incident reports ≤15d","Serious incident notifications"], + schedule="FRIA per Annex III deployment; EU AI Office filing per >10^25 FLOP model; quarterly disclosures" + ), + section("M6","S5","Systemic-Risk Controls + Cross-Bank Coordination", + controls=["Cross-bank concentration risk monitoring","Common-cause failure analysis","Vendor-AI dependency mapping","ICAAP scenario for systemic AI failure"], + coordination=["BIS AI working group participation","FSB ICT/AI risk reporting","EAIP cross-org receipts","GAISM mesh contribution"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M6) +print("M4-M6 appended:", len(MODULES)) + +# ============================================================================ +# M7 — Civilizational AI Governance Stacks + Treaty Layers +# ============================================================================ +M7 = { + "mid": "M7", + "title": "Civilizational AI Governance Stacks + Treaty-Level Mechanisms", + "summary": "CEGL (Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer), LexAI-DSL + FV-LexAI formal verification, GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty layers, Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer, central bank/IMF integration, civilizational corpus + pilot treaties.", + "sections": [ + section("M7","S1","CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer", + description="Machine-checkable encoding of ethical norms (fairness, transparency, accountability, non-maleficence) alongside legal policies", + components=["LexAI-DSL — domain-specific language for governance directives","FV-LexAI — formal verification (Z3/CVC5 backend)","CEGL compiler: LexAI → OPA Rego + symbolic constraints"], + verification=["Policy non-conflict proof","Coverage of regulator clauses","Absence of unbounded discretion","Adversarial robustness of policy decisions"] + ), + section("M7","S2","GASRGP / GASC / GAISM Treaty Layers", + gasrgp="Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol — treaty-grade framework signed by jurisdictions", + gasc="Global AI Safety Council — multilateral body coordinating frontier-AI safety; receives mesh telemetry", + gaism="Global AI Safety Mesh — planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry from G-SIFIs + frontier labs", + integration="Sentinel v2.4 emits GAISM-format telemetry; Trust Index feed consumed by central banks + IMF" + ), + section("M7","S3","Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer", + trustIndex="Composite over CCS, ARI, DRI, CGI, regime-coverage, audit-attestation; quarterly publication; machine-readable + human-readable", + trustDerivatives="Financial layer where Trust Index drives capital surcharges, insurance premia, central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029", + cbIntegration=["ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA consume Trust Index","IMF Article IV references Trust Index for AI macroprudential risk","BIS coordination committee"] + ), + section("M7","S4","Civilizational Corpus + Pilot Treaties", + corpus="Library of governance precedents, treaties, jurisprudence, regulator guidance, academic literature; AI-readable + citeable", + pilotTreaties=["GASRGP-Pilot — 7+ jurisdictions, 2029 H2","Frontier Model Disclosure Compact — quarterly capability disclosures","Compute Reporting Treaty — >10^25 FLOP threshold"], + cgiTarget=0.75 + ), + section("M7","S5","Planetary Supervisory Mesh + Civilizational Annual Report", + mesh="GAISM Supervisory Mesh — supervisors subscribe to filtered telemetry feeds from Sentinel deployments worldwide", + annualReport=["Trust Index history","CGI scorecard","Treaty participation","Incident transparency","Lessons learned","Machine-readable + human-readable forms"], + publication="Annual; aligned with UN AI Advisory Body cadence" + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M7) + +# ============================================================================ +# M8 — Phased Implementation + Research Roadmap +# ============================================================================ +M8 = { + "mid": "M8", + "title": "Phased Implementation + Research Roadmap with Dependencies + Critical Path", + "summary": "Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1) through Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030); critical path; exit gates; research tracks; budget envelopes.", + "sections": [ + section("M8","S1","Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1)", + objectives=["CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee","EU AI Act gap analysis","ISO 42001 readiness","AI inventory + risk classification","Charter + USD 150-450M envelope"], + exitGates=["Board signoff","Charter approval","Budget ratified"], + budgetShare="10%" + ), + section("M8","S2","Phase-1 Sentinel Core (2026 H2 - 2027 H1)", + objectives=["Sentinel v2.4 control plane in Nitro Enclaves","Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attestation","OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s","T0-T2 ops + 3 T3 pilots"], + exitGates=["SEC 17a-4 attestation","OPA admission proven","3 pilots in T3"], + budgetShare="30%" + ), + section("M8","S3","Phase-2 Enterprise Scale (2027 H2 - 2028)", + objectives=["WorkflowAI Pro GA","Zero-trust RAG GA","ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit","DORA drill <4h"], + exitGates=["ISO 42001 cert","≥80% prompts in WAP","DORA notice <4h proven twice"], + budgetShare="30%" + ), + section("M8","S4","Phase-3 Systemic Governance (2029)", + objectives=["EU AI Act 53/55 GPAI systemic-risk compliance","Traceability matrix v3","Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks","T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum"], + exitGates=["EU AI Office ack letter","3 central banks live","T4 quorum drill 3-of-5 pass"], + budgetShare="20%" + ), + section("M8","S5","Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030)", + objectives=["GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions","GAISM mesh live","CGI ≥0.75","ARI ≥0.9 frontier","Civilizational annual report"], + exitGates=["≥7 treaty signatories","GAISM uptime ≥99.9%","CGI attested","ARI ≥0.9"], + budgetShare="10%", + researchTracks=["Mechanistic interpretability scaling","Frontier alignment under self-improvement","Treaty-level verification (FV-LexAI)","Trust Derivatives macroprudential modeling","Civilizational corpus AI-readability"] + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M8) + +# ============================================================================ +# M9 — Regulator-Submission-Grade Blueprints + Artifacts +# ============================================================================ +M9 = { + "mid": "M9", + "title": "Regulator-Submission-Grade Blueprints + Artifacts", + "summary": "Machine-parsable directives (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL), Kafka WORM annexes, OPA policy bundles, Terraform governance modules, explainability schemas, cross-jurisdictional traceability matrix, Supervisory Submission Pack, planetary Supervisory Mesh integration certificate.", + "sections": [ + section("M9","S1","Machine-Parsable Governance Directives", + format="JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL dual form; SHACL constraints; W3C ODRL permissions/prohibitions; signed", + content=["Directive ID + version","Regime mapping","Control points + assertions","Evidence pointers (Kafka WORM offset)","Cross-references"], + consumption="Regulators ingest into supervisory tooling; auto-cross-check vs Sentinel telemetry" + ), + section("M9","S2","Annexes — Kafka WORM + OPA + Terraform", + kafkaAnnex=["Topic schemas (Avro + JSON Schema)","Offset → Merkle-root mapping","Retention proof (S3 Object Lock + Glacier vault lock)","Read-access list"], + opaAnnex=["Full Rego policy bundle signed","Decision logs (sampled) regime-tagged","Coverage report vs regime clauses","Change history Git + WORM"], + terraformAnnex=["modules/regulator-readonly-access","modules/evidence-pack-export","modules/sandbox-supervisor-drill"] + ), + section("M9","S3","Explainability Schemas + Traceability", + explainability=["Model card schema (extends Google Model Card v2)","Decision-explanation schema (SHAP + counterfactual + NL rationale)","Lineage schema (data→train→eval→deploy→decision)"], + traceability="Control × Regime × Clause × Evidence × Owner × Test; 28 regimes; queryable; JSON + CSV exports" + ), + section("M9","S4","Supervisory Submission Pack", + content=["Cover letter + executive summary","Machine-parsable directives bundle","All annexes (WORM, OPA, Terraform, explainability)","Traceability matrix","Audit attestations (ISO 42001, SOC 2, SEC 17a-4)","Drill after-action reports","Trust Index history","FRIA(s) + EU AI Office filing(s)","Civilizational annual report"], + delivery="Secure regulator portal; signed PDFs (PAdES-B-LTA); JSON-LD machine-readable bundles" + ), + section("M9","S5","Supervisory Drills + Demo Kits + Mesh Integration", + drills=["Quarterly with supervisor present","Mock SEV-0 + SEV-1 with full IR","Cross-jurisdictional drill annual"], + demoKits=["Sentinel v2.4 demo tenant with synthetic data","WorkflowAI Pro guided tour for supervisors","OPA + Kafka WORM live evidence walkthrough","Adversary Workbench red-team replay"], + meshIntegration="GAISM mesh integration certificate + standardized telemetry feed validation" + ) + ] +} +MODULES.append(M9) +print("M7-M9 appended:", len(MODULES)) + +# ============================================================================ +# Tail data structures +# ============================================================================ + +schemas = [ + {"sid":"SCH-01","name":"MasterBlueprintDirective","fields":["docRef","version","regime","clauses[]","controlPoints[]","evidencePointers[]","signature"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-02","name":"ReferenceArchitecture","fields":["systemId","layer","components[]","dataFlows[]","telemetry","scaling"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-03","name":"ModelCardExtended","fields":["modelId","provenance","trainingData","evaluation","fairness","tier","FRIA","signature"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-04","name":"FRIAArtifact","fields":["friaId","useCase","riskIdentified","stakeholders","mitigations","publicSummary"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-05","name":"EUAIOfficeFiling","fields":["filingId","modelId","computeFLOP","capabilityProfile","incidents","mitigations","submittedAt"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-06","name":"SR117ValidationReport","fields":["modelId","conceptualSoundness","outcomesAnalysis","ongoingMonitoring","effectiveChallenge","validator","approval"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-07","name":"BaselICAAPEntry","fields":["entryId","activity","capitalAdd","scenarios[]","liquidityImpact","approval"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-08","name":"GAISMTelemetry","fields":["entityId","period","CCS","ARI","DRI","CGI","regimeCoverage","compositeTrustIndex"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-09","name":"TrustIndexEntry","fields":["entityId","quarter","indices","attestation","publicURL","signature"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-10","name":"GASRGPSignatory","fields":["jurisdiction","signedAt","commitments[]","reportingCadence"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-11","name":"SupervisorySubmissionPack","fields":["packId","jurisdiction","contents[]","deliveryMethod","receipt"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-12","name":"IncidentRecord","fields":["incidentId","sev","trigger","timeline","impact","containment","regNotifications","RCA"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-13","name":"InterpretabilityReport","fields":["reportId","modelId","technique","features[]","circuits[]","anomalies[]","reviewers"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-14","name":"TraceabilityRow","fields":["controlId","regime","clause","evidence","owner","test","status"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-15","name":"AuditEvidence","fields":["evidenceId","kafkaTopic","offset","merkleRoot","s3Object","retention","auditor"]}, + {"sid":"SCH-16","name":"PolicyDirective","fields":["directiveId","lexAIDSL","regoCompiled","FVProofs[]","signature"]} +] + +code = [ + {"cid":"CODE-01","lang":"Python","name":"sentinel/kafka_worm.py","desc":"Kafka WORM producer + S3 Object Lock"}, + {"cid":"CODE-02","lang":"Rego","name":"policies/agi_tier_gating.rego","desc":"T2→T3, T3→T4 promotion policy"}, + {"cid":"CODE-03","lang":"Python","name":"sentinel/cognitive_resonance.py","desc":"Latent drift monitor"}, + {"cid":"CODE-04","lang":"HCL","name":"terraform/modules/sentinel-control-plane","desc":"Nitro Enclaves + KMS + IAM"}, + {"cid":"CODE-05","lang":"TypeScript","name":"workflowai/prompt-editor","desc":"Yjs CRDT collaborative editor"}, + {"cid":"CODE-06","lang":"Python","name":"workflowai/firestore_versions.py","desc":"Firestore semantic versioning"}, + {"cid":"CODE-07","lang":"Python","name":"devsecops/judge_llm_eval.py","desc":"Judge-LLM consensus pipeline"}, + {"cid":"CODE-08","lang":"Python","name":"rag/fiduciary_filter.py","desc":"Fiduciary checks pre-response"}, + {"cid":"CODE-09","lang":"Python","name":"safety/agi_sim_harness.py","desc":"AGI simulation harness"}, + {"cid":"CODE-10","lang":"Python","name":"interop/eaip_protocol.py","desc":"EAIP handshake + receipts"}, + {"cid":"CODE-11","lang":"Python","name":"interp/sae_features.py","desc":"Sparse autoencoder feature extraction"}, + {"cid":"CODE-12","lang":"YAML","name":"argocd/governance-as-code.yaml","desc":"GitOps governance manifest"}, + {"cid":"CODE-13","lang":"Python","name":"compliance/eu_ai_office_filing.py","desc":"EU AI Office systemic-risk filing builder"}, + {"cid":"CODE-14","lang":"Python","name":"compliance/sr117_validation.py","desc":"SR 11-7 validation report generator"}, + {"cid":"CODE-15","lang":"Python","name":"trust/gaism_telemetry.py","desc":"GAISM telemetry emitter"} +] + +kpis = [ + {"kid":"KPI-01","name":"DRI","target":">=0.95 by 2030","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-02","name":"CCS","target":">=0.95","cadence":"per promotion + quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-03","name":"ARI frontier","target":">=0.90","cadence":"monthly red-team"}, + {"kid":"KPI-04","name":"CSI T3/T4","target":">=0.95","cadence":"continuous"}, + {"kid":"KPI-05","name":"CGI","target":">=0.75 by 2030","cadence":"annual external review"}, + {"kid":"KPI-06","name":"MRGI","target":">=0.95","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-07","name":"RCI (regime coverage)","target":"1.0","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-08","name":"OPA policy decision p99","target":"<10ms","cadence":"continuous"}, + {"kid":"KPI-09","name":"Kafka WORM retention coverage","target":"100% topics S3 Object Lock 7y","cadence":"daily"}, + {"kid":"KPI-10","name":"Production image signing","target":"100%","cadence":"per admission"}, + {"kid":"KPI-11","name":"Drift detect→alert p99","target":"<60s","cadence":"continuous"}, + {"kid":"KPI-12","name":"WorkflowAI Pro prompt coverage","target":">=80% Group prompts","cadence":"monthly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-13","name":"Judge-LLM consensus","target":">=4/5","cadence":"per prompt promotion"}, + {"kid":"KPI-14","name":"ISO 42001 NCs","target":"0 major","cadence":"annual"}, + {"kid":"KPI-15","name":"DORA major-incident notify","target":"<4h","cadence":"per drill + incident"}, + {"kid":"KPI-16","name":"EU AI Act 53/55 filing","target":"on-time per cycle","cadence":"per cycle"}, + {"kid":"KPI-17","name":"SEC 17a-4 WORM attestation","target":"annual clean","cadence":"annual"}, + {"kid":"KPI-18","name":"T4 quorum drill pass rate","target":"100% 3-of-5","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-19","name":"Kinetic override readiness","target":"<5min mean","cadence":"quarterly drill"}, + {"kid":"KPI-20","name":"Self-exfiltration attempts blocked","target":"100%","cadence":"per attempt"}, + {"kid":"KPI-21","name":"Repeat incidents 12mo","target":"<5%","cadence":"rolling"}, + {"kid":"KPI-22","name":"Time-to-policy-update post-incident","target":"<14d","cadence":"per incident"}, + {"kid":"KPI-23","name":"Trust Index publication","target":"quarterly on-time","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-24","name":"GASRGP signatories","target":">=7 by 2030","cadence":"annual"}, + {"kid":"KPI-25","name":"GAISM mesh telemetry uptime","target":">=99.9%","cadence":"continuous"}, + {"kid":"KPI-26","name":"Civilizational annual report","target":"published annually","cadence":"annual"}, + {"kid":"KPI-27","name":"FRIA completion","target":"100% Annex III deployments","cadence":"per deployment"}, + {"kid":"KPI-28","name":"NPV achieved","target":"USD 450-1400M / 5y","cadence":"annual"}, + {"kid":"KPI-29","name":"SR 11-7 validation coverage","target":"100% material models","cadence":"quarterly"}, + {"kid":"KPI-30","name":"Three-lines-of-defense independence","target":"0 findings of independence breach","cadence":"annual audit"} +] + +riskControlMatrix = [ + {"rid":"R-01","risk":"AGI misalignment in T3 production","likelihood":"Low","impact":"Catastrophic","control":"T3 gating + quorum + Cognitive Resonance + kinetic override","owner":"CAIO"}, + {"rid":"R-02","risk":"Prompt-injection data exfiltration","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"OPA egress policies + Sigstore + zero-trust RAG","owner":"CISO"}, + {"rid":"R-03","risk":"Supply-chain compromise","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"Sigstore + PQ signing + SBOM + Rekor","owner":"CISO"}, + {"rid":"R-04","risk":"EU AI Act 2026 non-compliance","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"Full clause traceability + ISO 42001 + Annexes","owner":"CCO"}, + {"rid":"R-05","risk":"SR 11-7 validation gap","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"Independent validation + effective challenge + WORM evidence","owner":"Head of Model Risk"}, + {"rid":"R-06","risk":"DORA major-incident miss","likelihood":"Low","impact":"High","control":"Auto SEV-1 + 4h timer + drill","owner":"CRO"}, + {"rid":"R-07","risk":"Latent drift undetected >60s","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"Medium","control":"Cognitive Resonance + multi-probe + alert tiering","owner":"Head MLSecOps"}, + {"rid":"R-08","risk":"Swarm collusion","likelihood":"Low","impact":"High","control":"Distributed tracing + collusion detection + isolation","owner":"Head of WAP"}, + {"rid":"R-09","risk":"RAG hallucination → regulated misadvice","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"Citation + verification LLM + fiduciary filter","owner":"Head of RAG"}, + {"rid":"R-10","risk":"Cross-tenant data leak","likelihood":"Low","impact":"High","control":"RLS + namespace isolation + retrieval forensics","owner":"CISO"}, + {"rid":"R-11","risk":"T4 quorum stuck","likelihood":"Low","impact":"Critical","control":"Standby quorum + reg liaison + escalation","owner":"CAIO"}, + {"rid":"R-12","risk":"Civilizational governance fragmentation","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty pursuit + corpus","owner":"CAIO + GC"}, + {"rid":"R-13","risk":"Budget overrun >10%","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"Medium","control":"Quarterly Group Risk Committee + reforecast","owner":"CFO"}, + {"rid":"R-14","risk":"Talent gap","likelihood":"High","impact":"High","control":"Academic partnerships + retention bonuses","owner":"CHRO + CAIO"}, + {"rid":"R-15","risk":"Systemic AI concentration (cross-bank)","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"Catastrophic","control":"BIS/FSB coordination + ICAAP scenario + Trust Index","owner":"CRO + CAIO"}, + {"rid":"R-16","risk":"FCRA/ECOA disparate impact","likelihood":"Medium","impact":"High","control":"Fairness tests + adverse action language + audit","owner":"CCO + Head of Credit"} +] + +traceability = [ + {"tid":"T-01","control":"Kafka WORM audit","regime":"SEC 17a-4","clause":"17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)","evidence":"S3 Object Lock + Glacier"}, + {"tid":"T-02","control":"OPA admission","regime":"EU AI Act","clause":"Art. 9","evidence":"OPA decision logs"}, + {"tid":"T-03","control":"FRIA","regime":"EU AI Act","clause":"Art. 27","evidence":"FRIA documents"}, + {"tid":"T-04","control":"GPAI systemic-risk","regime":"EU AI Act","clause":"Arts. 53/55","evidence":"EU AI Office filing"}, + {"tid":"T-05","control":"Independent validation","regime":"SR 11-7","clause":"Section V","evidence":"Validation reports"}, + {"tid":"T-06","control":"AIMS","regime":"ISO/IEC 42001","clause":"Clauses 4-10","evidence":"ISO 42001 certificate"}, + {"tid":"T-07","control":"Major-incident notice","regime":"DORA","clause":"Art. 19","evidence":"Notification logs"}, + {"tid":"T-08","control":"Model card","regime":"NIST AI RMF","clause":"Map 4 / Measure 2","evidence":"Registry"}, + {"tid":"T-09","control":"Fairness review","regime":"FCRA/ECOA","clause":"FCRA 615 / ECOA Reg B","evidence":"Fairness reports"}, + {"tid":"T-10","control":"Cybersecurity","regime":"NIS2","clause":"Art. 21","evidence":"NIS2 register"}, + {"tid":"T-11","control":"Data residency","regime":"GDPR","clause":"Art. 44+","evidence":"Data flow + SCC"}, + {"tid":"T-12","control":"GenAI risk actions","regime":"NIST AI 600-1","clause":"Profile actions 1-200+","evidence":"WORM decision logs"}, + {"tid":"T-13","control":"OECD alignment","regime":"OECD AI Principles","clause":"P1-P5","evidence":"Annual OECD self-assessment"}, + {"tid":"T-14","control":"Basel Pillar 2","regime":"Basel III/IV","clause":"Pillar 2 ICAAP","evidence":"ICAAP doc + AI scenario"}, + {"tid":"T-15","control":"FEAT","regime":"MAS FEAT","clause":"Full principle set","evidence":"FEAT self-assessment"}, + {"tid":"T-16","control":"E-23","regime":"OSFI E-23","clause":"E-23 sections","evidence":"E-23 attestation"}, + {"tid":"T-17","control":"SS1/23","regime":"PRA SS1/23","clause":"Full SS","evidence":"PRA submission"}, + {"tid":"T-18","control":"GP-1/GS-2","regime":"HKMA","clause":"GP-1 / GS-2","evidence":"HKMA returns"}, + {"tid":"T-19","control":"AI risk disclosure","regime":"SEC 10-K","clause":"Item 1A","evidence":"10-K filings"}, + {"tid":"T-20","control":"Material incident","regime":"SEC 8-K","clause":"Item 1.05","evidence":"8-K filings"} +] + +dataFlows = [ + {"fid":"DF-01","src":"Model inference","sink":"Kafka WORM (audit.governance)","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"mTLS + at-rest"}, + {"fid":"DF-02","src":"WorkflowAI Pro edits","sink":"Firestore + Kafka WORM","sensitivity":"medium","encryption":"mTLS"}, + {"fid":"DF-03","src":"RAG retrieval","sink":"Vector DB + Kafka WORM","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"mTLS"}, + {"fid":"DF-04","src":"OPA decisions","sink":"Kafka WORM","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"mTLS"}, + {"fid":"DF-05","src":"Drift alerts","sink":"Kafka WORM + SOC","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"mTLS"}, + {"fid":"DF-06","src":"IR records","sink":"Kafka WORM + Jira","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"mTLS"}, + {"fid":"DF-07","src":"FRIA","sink":"Compliance archive + EU AI Office","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"signed + at-rest"}, + {"fid":"DF-08","src":"SR 11-7 validation","sink":"Model risk registry + WORM","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"at-rest"}, + {"fid":"DF-09","src":"GAISM telemetry","sink":"Planetary Supervisory Mesh","sensitivity":"public-attested","encryption":"signed"}, + {"fid":"DF-10","src":"Trust Index","sink":"Central banks + IMF feeds","sensitivity":"public-attested","encryption":"signed"}, + {"fid":"DF-11","src":"Interpretability reports","sink":"Reports vault + WORM","sensitivity":"medium","encryption":"at-rest"}, + {"fid":"DF-12","src":"Supervisory Submission Pack","sink":"Regulator portal","sensitivity":"high","encryption":"signed + portal-TLS"} +] + +regulators = [ + {"reg":"EU AI Office","scope":"AI Act enforcement (incl. GPAI Arts. 53/55)","cadence":"quarterly liaison"}, + {"reg":"NIST","scope":"AI RMF + AI 600-1 guidance","cadence":"as-needed"}, + {"reg":"ISO/IEC SC 42","scope":"AI standards (42001/23894)","cadence":"annual cert audit"}, + {"reg":"Federal Reserve","scope":"SR 11-7 + macroprudential","cadence":"annual exam"}, + {"reg":"OCC","scope":"OCC 2011-12 model risk","cadence":"annual exam"}, + {"reg":"SEC","scope":"17a-4 + 10-K + 8-K","cadence":"per filing + incident"}, + {"reg":"FDIC","scope":"Deposit-taking AI risk","cadence":"annual exam"}, + {"reg":"FCA","scope":"UK AI fairness + market conduct","cadence":"quarterly liaison"}, + {"reg":"PRA","scope":"SS1/23 + UK model risk","cadence":"annual SREP"}, + {"reg":"MAS","scope":"FEAT + Veritas","cadence":"quarterly liaison"}, + {"reg":"HKMA","scope":"GP-1 / GS-2","cadence":"annual returns"}, + {"reg":"OSFI","scope":"E-23 model risk","cadence":"annual attestation"}, + {"reg":"FINMA","scope":"AI guidance + Swiss banking law","cadence":"annual"}, + {"reg":"EU DPAs (EDPB)","scope":"GDPR Art. 44+","cadence":"per DPIA / incident"}, + {"reg":"FINRA","scope":"Rules 3110/3120/4511 supervision","cadence":"per filing"}, + {"reg":"BIS / FSB","scope":"Cross-bank systemic AI risk","cadence":"semi-annual reporting"} +] + +privacy = { + "regimes":["GDPR","UK GDPR","CCPA/CPRA","LGPD","PIPL"], + "controls":["DPIA per high-risk processing","Data minimization at retrieval","RTBF in vector index","Cross-border SCC + adequacy","Consent records WORM-logged","Art. 22 explicit safeguards"], + "pets":["Differential privacy ε≤1.0","Federated learning where feasible","Confidential computing T3-T4","Secure enclaves for CCaaS","Homomorphic encryption pilots"] +} + +deployment = { + "environments":["Dev","Staging (T1)","Canary (T2)","Production Nitro (T3)","Frontier Air-Gapped (T4)"], + "regions":["EU (Frankfurt + Dublin)","US (us-east-1 + us-west-2)","APAC (Singapore + Tokyo)","UK (London)","CA (Toronto)","CH (Zurich)"], + "dr":"Multi-region active-passive; RPO 5min; RTO 60min; quarterly DR drill", + "compliance":["Region pinning per GDPR Art. 44","Data residency OPA-enforced","Sovereign cloud options (EU/UK/CH public sector)"] +} + +rollout90 = [ + {"day":"0-30","focus":"Charter + CAIO + Board mandate + EU AI Act gap","deliverables":["Charter signed","Gap report","ISO 42001 readiness"]}, + {"day":"31-60","focus":"Sentinel v2.4 control-plane PoC + Kafka WORM topic design","deliverables":["PoC env","Topic schemas","OPA bundle v0"]}, + {"day":"61-90","focus":"3 pilot models in T2 + WorkflowAI Pro alpha + first reg liaison","deliverables":["T2 pilots","WAP alpha","Reg meeting minutes"]} +] + +roadmap = [ + {"yr":"2026","milestone":"Phase-0 done; Sentinel Core PoC; WorkflowAI Pro alpha; ISO 42001 readiness; EU AI Act applicability ready"}, + {"yr":"2027","milestone":"Phase-1 done; Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested; OPA Gatekeeper GA; ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit"}, + {"yr":"2028","milestone":"Phase-2 done; WorkflowAI Pro GA; zero-trust RAG GA; DORA <4h proven; ISO 42001 cert"}, + {"yr":"2029","milestone":"Phase-3 done; EU AI Act 53/55 filing; T4 frontier ops; Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks; GASRGP pilot prep"}, + {"yr":"2030","milestone":"Phase-4 done; GASRGP treaty 7+; GAISM mesh live; CGI ≥0.75; ARI ≥0.9 frontier; civilizational annual report"} +] + +evidencePack = [ + {"epid":"EP-01","name":"Charter + Board minutes","format":"PDF signed"}, + {"epid":"EP-02","name":"EU AI Act gap + remediation log","format":"JSON + PDF"}, + {"epid":"EP-03","name":"ISO 42001 AIMS evidence","format":"PDF + JSON"}, + {"epid":"EP-04","name":"Kafka WORM topic + retention proofs","format":"JSON signed"}, + {"epid":"EP-05","name":"OPA policy bundle + decision logs","format":"Rego + JSON"}, + {"epid":"EP-06","name":"Terraform governance modules","format":"HCL + plan"}, + {"epid":"EP-07","name":"Model cards + provenance","format":"JSON signed"}, + {"epid":"EP-08","name":"Cross-jurisdictional traceability matrix","format":"JSON + CSV"}, + {"epid":"EP-09","name":"DORA drill after-action reports","format":"PDF"}, + {"epid":"EP-10","name":"Red-team + judge-LLM eval reports","format":"JSON + PDF"}, + {"epid":"EP-11","name":"Trust Index history","format":"JSON signed"}, + {"epid":"EP-12","name":"Civilizational annual report","format":"PDF + JSON-LD"}, + {"epid":"EP-13","name":"FRIA documents (per Annex III deployment)","format":"PDF + JSON"}, + {"epid":"EP-14","name":"EU AI Office systemic-risk filings","format":"PDF + JSON-LD"}, + {"epid":"EP-15","name":"SR 11-7 validation reports","format":"PDF + JSON"}, + {"epid":"EP-16","name":"Supervisory Submission Pack (master)","format":"PDF + JSON-LD bundle"} +] + +executiveSummary = { + "headline":"Comprehensive 2026-2030 master blueprint — institutional AGI/ASI governance + safety + Enterprise AI + civilizational stacks — for Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs.", + "investment":"USD 150-450M over 5y (G-SIFI tier)", + "npv":"USD 450-1400M", + "phases":"P0 (2026 H1) → P1 (2026 H2-27 H1) → P2 (27 H2-28) → P3 (2029) → P4 (2030)", + "scopeFive":["Architecture","Compliance","Safety","Financial-Services","Civilizational"], + "regimes":"28 regimes mapped end-to-end", + "topRisks":["AGI misalignment in T3","EU AI Act non-compliance","Systemic AI concentration","Civilizational fragmentation","Talent gap"], + "topOpportunities":["Trust Derivatives Layer revenue","Inter-bank EAIP standard","Regulator demo leadership","ISO 42001 + GASRGP pilot leadership","GAISM mesh integration"], + "boardAsks":["Approve charter + envelope","Approve CAIO mandate","Endorse 5-year horizon","Quarterly Group Risk Committee oversight","Annual board AI risk review"] +} + +print("Tail data structures defined") + +# ============================================================================ +# 9 distinctive arrays +# ============================================================================ + +architectureRefs = [ + arch_ref("AR-01","Sentinel v2.4","Control Plane",components=["Sentinel orchestrator (Go)","KMS envelope","Vault","HSM quorum"],hosting="Nitro Enclaves"), + arch_ref("AR-02","Sentinel v2.4","Audit Ledger",components=["MSK Kafka","S3 Object Lock 7y","Glacier vault lock","Merkle attestation"],hosting="Multi-AZ"), + arch_ref("AR-03","Sentinel v2.4","Policy Plane",components=["OPA Gatekeeper","Cilium bundle service","Cosign-signed bundles"],hosting="K8s admission controllers"), + arch_ref("AR-04","Sentinel v2.4","Containment Plane",components=["T0-T4 isolation","Kata Containers","Cilium L7 zero-egress","Faraday-class T4 enclosure"],hosting="Tier-specific"), + arch_ref("AR-05","Sentinel v2.4","Telemetry Plane",components=["Prometheus + Grafana","OpenTelemetry","Datadog APM","GAISM mesh feed"],hosting="Multi-region"), + arch_ref("AR-06","WorkflowAI Pro","Authoring",components=["Yjs CRDT","Tailwind + shadcn/ui","Inline AI suggest","Comments + @mentions"],hosting="Edge + Firestore"), + arch_ref("AR-07","WorkflowAI Pro","Versioning + Testing",components=["Firestore semantic versions","Test harness","Judge-LLM consensus","A/B canary"],hosting="Firestore + Cloud Run"), + arch_ref("AR-08","WorkflowAI Pro","RBAC + Secrets",components=["Roles + ABAC","Vault","KMS envelope","Per-tenant isolation"],hosting="Vault + IAM"), + arch_ref("AR-09","WorkflowAI Pro","Tracing + Audit",components=["OpenTelemetry","W3C Trace Context","Swarm viz","Kafka WORM"],hosting="Jaeger + Datadog + MSK"), + arch_ref("AR-10","WorkflowAI Pro","Reporting",components=["Tailwind Prose","KaTeX + Mermaid","Headless Chrome PDF","PAdES-B-LTA"],hosting="Cloud Run + S3 WORM") +] + +complianceMaps = [ + compliance_map("CM-01","EU AI Act","Art. 9 (Risk management)",controlPoints=["Risk register","Periodic review","Documentation"],evidence="OPA admission + Kafka WORM"), + compliance_map("CM-02","EU AI Act","Art. 10 (Data governance)",controlPoints=["Bias audits","Quality criteria","Representativeness"],evidence="Data lineage + fairness reports"), + compliance_map("CM-03","EU AI Act","Art. 13 (Transparency)",controlPoints=["User notice","Instructions for use","Capability disclosure"],evidence="Model card + UI affordances"), + compliance_map("CM-04","EU AI Act","Art. 15 (Accuracy + Robustness)",controlPoints=["Performance metrics","Robustness tests","Cybersecurity controls"],evidence="Eval reports + red-team"), + compliance_map("CM-05","EU AI Act","Art. 27 (FRIA)",controlPoints=["FRIA per Annex III","Stakeholder mapping","Public summary"],evidence="FRIA artifacts"), + compliance_map("CM-06","EU AI Act","Arts. 53/55 (GPAI systemic-risk)",controlPoints=["Capability disclosure","Incident reporting","Risk assessment"],evidence="EU AI Office filings"), + compliance_map("CM-07","NIST AI RMF","Govern + Map + Measure + Manage",controlPoints=["Full RMF coverage","NIST AI 600-1 GenAI actions"],evidence="RMF self-assessment + WORM"), + compliance_map("CM-08","ISO 42001","Clauses 4-10",controlPoints=["AIMS implementation","Internal audit","Management review"],evidence="ISO 42001 cert + audit reports"), + compliance_map("CM-09","SR 11-7","Section V (Validation)",controlPoints=["Independent validation","Effective challenge","Ongoing monitoring"],evidence="Validation reports + WORM"), + compliance_map("CM-10","Basel III/IV","Pillar 2 (ICAAP)",controlPoints=["AI scenario","Capital add","Stress test"],evidence="ICAAP doc + Pillar 3 disclosures"), + compliance_map("CM-11","DORA","Art. 19 (Major-incident)",controlPoints=["≤4h notice","Initial + interim + final reports"],evidence="DORA drill + actual incident reports"), + compliance_map("CM-12","NIS2","Art. 21 (Risk-management)",controlPoints=["Cyber-risk measures","Reporting","Essential entity"],evidence="NIS2 register"), + compliance_map("CM-13","GDPR","Art. 22 + Art. 35 (DPIA)",controlPoints=["Automated decisions safeguards","DPIA for high-risk"],evidence="DPIA + Art. 22 user controls"), + compliance_map("CM-14","FCRA/ECOA","FCRA 615 + ECOA Reg B",controlPoints=["Adverse action","Non-discrimination","Disparate impact tests"],evidence="Fairness reports + adverse-action templates"), + compliance_map("CM-15","OECD AI Principles","P1-P5",controlPoints=["Alignment self-assessment","Public commitments"],evidence="OECD self-assessment + annual report") +] + +governanceFrameworks = [ + gov_framework("GF-01","Board","AI Risk Committee Charter",members=["Chair","Independent NED","CEO","Audit Chair","Ethics advisor"],cadence="Quarterly + ad-hoc SEV-0/1"), + gov_framework("GF-02","Executive","CAIO operating model",scope=["Strategy","Standards","Inventory","Frontier program"]), + gov_framework("GF-03","Executive","CRO operating model",scope=["Risk appetite","Validation oversight","SR 11-7","Aggregation risk"]), + gov_framework("GF-04","Executive","CISO operating model",scope=["Threat intel","Containment + IR","Supply chain","Sandbox"]), + gov_framework("GF-05","Executive","CCO operating model",scope=["EU AI Act + NIST + ISO 42001 + GDPR","Reg liaison","Submissions","Attestations"]), + gov_framework("GF-06","Operations","Three Lines of Defense",lines=["Line 1: Product + engineering","Line 2: Risk + Compliance + CISO","Line 3: Internal Audit + Auditors + Regulators"]), + gov_framework("GF-07","Operations","Policy hierarchy",levels=["Board Charter","Group Policy","Domain Standards","Technical Standards","Procedures"]), + gov_framework("GF-08","Operations","Decision rights matrix",tiers={"T0→T1":"Eng lead","T1→T2":"Domain head + MLSecOps","T2→T3":"CAIO + CRO","T3→T4":"3-of-5 quorum","SEV-0 override":"Quorum + CEO + Reg courtesy"}), + gov_framework("GF-09","Risk","Risk appetite + KRI framework",kris=["CCS","ARI","DRI","CSI","CGI","MRGI","RCI"]), + gov_framework("GF-10","Risk","Escalation paths",levels=["Yellow → CAIO","Orange → CRO + GRC","Red → Board ARC + Reg courtesy"]), + gov_framework("GF-11","Talent","Frontier-safety hiring + retention",measures=["Academic partnerships","Retention bonuses","Dual-track IC/Mgr","Sabbaticals"]), + gov_framework("GF-12","Culture","AI ethics + training",measures=["Mandatory annual training","Ethics whistleblower channel","Quarterly all-hands review"]) +] + +safetyMechanisms = [ + safety_mech("SM-01","Behavioral","Goal misgeneralization probes",cadence="Per promotion + monthly"), + safety_mech("SM-02","Behavioral","Mesa-optimizer detection",cadence="Continuous T3-T4"), + safety_mech("SM-03","Behavioral","Deceptive alignment probes",cadence="Per promotion + on-incident"), + safety_mech("SM-04","Behavioral","Self-exfiltration scenarios",cadence="Continuous T3-T4"), + safety_mech("SM-05","Behavioral","Reward-hacking via tool-call",cadence="Continuous T3-T4"), + safety_mech("SM-06","Mechanistic","Sparse autoencoders (SAE)",cadence="Continuous T3-T4"), + safety_mech("SM-07","Mechanistic","Activation patching",cadence="On-incident + monthly"), + safety_mech("SM-08","Mechanistic","Probe classifiers + ACDC",cadence="Quarterly"), + safety_mech("SM-09","Containment","T0-T4 tiering",cadence="Per deployment"), + safety_mech("SM-10","Containment","Cilium L7 zero-egress",cadence="Continuous"), + safety_mech("SM-11","Containment","Kata + Nitro/SEV-SNP/TDX",cadence="T2+ continuous"), + safety_mech("SM-12","Containment","Air-gap + Faraday T4",cadence="T4 continuous"), + safety_mech("SM-13","Containment","HSM-backed 3-of-5 quorum",cadence="Per T3→T4 + SEV-0"), + safety_mech("SM-14","Containment","Kinetic override ≤5min",cadence="Per SEV-0"), + safety_mech("SM-15","Adversary","T4 Adversary Workbench",cadence="Quarterly + on-demand") +] + +financialServicesRisks = [ + fs_risk("FS-01","Model risk","SR 11-7 independent validation",owner="Head of Model Risk",cadence="Per material model"), + fs_risk("FS-02","Model risk","Effective challenge",owner="CRO",cadence="Per validation"), + fs_risk("FS-03","Model risk","Ongoing monitoring + threshold alerts",owner="Head MLSecOps",cadence="Continuous"), + fs_risk("FS-04","Capital","Basel Pillar 1 RWA with AI activity",owner="CFO + CRO",cadence="Quarterly"), + fs_risk("FS-05","Capital","Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenarios",owner="CRO",cadence="Annual"), + fs_risk("FS-06","Capital","Pillar 3 AI risk disclosures",owner="CFO",cadence="Annual"), + fs_risk("FS-07","Trading","MiFID II algo-trading registration",owner="Head of Trading + CCO",cadence="Per algo"), + fs_risk("FS-08","Trading","MAR market-abuse surveillance",owner="Head of Compliance",cadence="Continuous"), + fs_risk("FS-09","Credit","FCRA 615 adverse action + explainability",owner="Head of Credit + CCO",cadence="Per decision"), + fs_risk("FS-10","Credit","ECOA Reg B disparate impact",owner="CCO",cadence="Quarterly testing"), + fs_risk("FS-11","AML","SAR/STR AI explainability",owner="Head of AML",cadence="Per alert"), + fs_risk("FS-12","Systemic","Cross-bank concentration",owner="CRO + CAIO",cadence="Quarterly + BIS reporting"), + fs_risk("FS-13","Systemic","ICAAP common-cause AI scenario",owner="CRO",cadence="Annual"), + fs_risk("FS-14","Resilience","DORA TLPT every 3y",owner="CISO + CRO",cadence="Triennial"), + fs_risk("FS-15","Resilience","ICT third-party register",owner="CISO + Procurement",cadence="Continuous") +] + +civilizationalStacks = [ + civ_stack("CV-01","Ethical","CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer",notes="Machine-checkable ethical norms alongside legal policies"), + civ_stack("CV-02","Language","LexAI-DSL — governance directive DSL",notes="Used to express directives + verification obligations"), + civ_stack("CV-03","Formal-verification","FV-LexAI — Z3/CVC5 backend",notes="Proves policy non-conflict, coverage, robustness"), + civ_stack("CV-04","Treaty","GASRGP — Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol",notes="Treaty-grade framework; signatories ≥7 by 2030"), + civ_stack("CV-05","Treaty","GASC — Global AI Safety Council",notes="Multilateral body; coordinates frontier safety"), + civ_stack("CV-06","Treaty","GAISM — Global AI Safety Mesh",notes="Planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry"), + civ_stack("CV-07","Financial","Global Trust Index",notes="Quarterly composite published machine-readable + human-readable"), + civ_stack("CV-08","Financial","Trust Derivatives Layer",notes="Capital surcharges + insurance premia + central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029"), + civ_stack("CV-09","Central-bank","ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA integration",notes="Trust Index feed consumption"), + civ_stack("CV-10","Macro","IMF Article IV integration",notes="AI macroprudential risk references Trust Index"), + civ_stack("CV-11","Corpus","Civilizational AI governance corpus",notes="AI-readable + citeable library of precedents, treaties, jurisprudence"), + civ_stack("CV-12","Pilot-treaty","Frontier Model Disclosure Compact",notes="Quarterly capability disclosures from frontier labs"), + civ_stack("CV-13","Pilot-treaty","Compute Reporting Treaty",notes=">10^25 FLOP threshold reporting"), + civ_stack("CV-14","Annual-report","Civilizational annual report",notes="Trust Index history + CGI scorecard + treaty participation + incident transparency"), + civ_stack("CV-15","UN-track","UN AI Advisory Body recommendations",notes="Aligned with UN AI Resolution + GA") +] + +roadmapItems = [ + roadmap_item("RM-01","P0 (2026 H1)","CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee mandate",dependencies=["—"],owner="Group CEO + Chair"), + roadmap_item("RM-02","P0 (2026 H1)","EU AI Act gap analysis + ISO 42001 readiness",dependencies=["RM-01"],owner="CCO + CAIO"), + roadmap_item("RM-03","P0 (2026 H1)","Charter + USD 150-450M envelope ratified",dependencies=["RM-01","RM-02"],owner="CFO + Group Risk Committee"), + roadmap_item("RM-04","P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)","Sentinel v2.4 control plane GA",dependencies=["RM-03"],owner="Sentinel Program Director"), + roadmap_item("RM-05","P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)","Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested",dependencies=["RM-04"],owner="Head MLSecOps"), + roadmap_item("RM-06","P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1)","OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s",dependencies=["RM-04"],owner="Head Platform"), + roadmap_item("RM-07","P2 (2027 H2-2028)","WorkflowAI Pro GA",dependencies=["RM-06"],owner="Head of WAP"), + roadmap_item("RM-08","P2 (2027 H2-2028)","Zero-trust RAG GA",dependencies=["RM-06","RM-07"],owner="Head of RAG"), + roadmap_item("RM-09","P2 (2027 H2-2028)","ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit + cert",dependencies=["RM-05","RM-06"],owner="CCO + CAIO"), + roadmap_item("RM-10","P2 (2027 H2-2028)","DORA drill <4h proven twice",dependencies=["RM-05"],owner="CRO"), + roadmap_item("RM-11","P3 (2029)","EU AI Act 53/55 systemic-risk filing",dependencies=["RM-09"],owner="CCO"), + roadmap_item("RM-12","P3 (2029)","T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum",dependencies=["RM-04","RM-09"],owner="CAIO + CISO"), + roadmap_item("RM-13","P3 (2029)","Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks",dependencies=["RM-11","RM-12"],owner="CAIO + CFO"), + roadmap_item("RM-14","P4 (2030)","GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions",dependencies=["RM-12","RM-13"],owner="CAIO + GC + Group CEO"), + roadmap_item("RM-15","P4 (2030)","GAISM mesh live + CGI ≥0.75 + civilizational annual report",dependencies=["RM-13","RM-14"],owner="CAIO") +] + +regulatorBlueprints = [ + reg_blueprint("RB-01","EU AI Act","Machine-parsable directive bundle (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL)",consumer="EU AI Office"), + reg_blueprint("RB-02","EU AI Act","Arts. 53/55 systemic-risk filing template",consumer="EU AI Office"), + reg_blueprint("RB-03","EU AI Act","FRIA template (per Annex III)",consumer="National competent authorities"), + reg_blueprint("RB-04","SEC 17a-4","Kafka WORM annex + retention proof",consumer="SEC + external auditor"), + reg_blueprint("RB-05","SEC 10-K Item 1A","AI risk disclosure language",consumer="SEC"), + reg_blueprint("RB-06","SEC 8-K Item 1.05","Material AI incident disclosure",consumer="SEC"), + reg_blueprint("RB-07","SR 11-7","Validation report template + effective challenge log",consumer="Fed + OCC"), + reg_blueprint("RB-08","Basel III/IV","Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenario + Pillar 3 disclosure",consumer="National prudential supervisors"), + reg_blueprint("RB-09","ISO 42001","AIMS evidence pack + Stage 2 audit report",consumer="ISO certification body"), + reg_blueprint("RB-10","DORA","Major-incident notification + drill after-actions",consumer="EU national competent authorities"), + reg_blueprint("RB-11","NIS2","Cyber risk-management register",consumer="EU national CSIRTs"), + reg_blueprint("RB-12","GDPR","DPIA template + Art. 22 safeguards",consumer="EU DPAs"), + reg_blueprint("RB-13","FCRA/ECOA","Adverse action template + disparate impact report",consumer="CFPB + bank regulators"), + reg_blueprint("RB-14","NIST AI RMF","RMF self-assessment + AI 600-1 mapping",consumer="NIST (voluntary)"), + reg_blueprint("RB-15","OECD","OECD AI Principles self-assessment",consumer="OECD"), + reg_blueprint("RB-16","MAS FEAT","FEAT self-assessment",consumer="MAS"), + reg_blueprint("RB-17","OSFI E-23","E-23 attestation + model risk register",consumer="OSFI"), + reg_blueprint("RB-18","PRA SS1/23","UK model risk submission",consumer="PRA"), + reg_blueprint("RB-19","HKMA GP-1/GS-2","HKMA returns + clause mapping",consumer="HKMA"), + reg_blueprint("RB-20","GASRGP","Treaty pilot document + signatory log",consumer="Multilateral GASC"), + reg_blueprint("RB-21","GAISM","Mesh telemetry feed + integration cert",consumer="Planetary Supervisory Mesh"), + reg_blueprint("RB-22","Cross-jurisdictional","Master Supervisory Submission Pack",consumer="Lead supervisor on demand") +] + +researchTracks = [ + research_track("RT-01","Mechanistic interpretability","Sparse autoencoders at frontier scale",dependencies=["—"],owner="Head of Interpretability"), + research_track("RT-02","Mechanistic interpretability","Causal circuit discovery (ACDC + path patching)",dependencies=["RT-01"],owner="Head of Interpretability"), + research_track("RT-03","Frontier alignment","Self-improvement under verified constraints",dependencies=["RT-01","RT-02"],owner="Head of Alignment"), + research_track("RT-04","Frontier alignment","Deceptive-alignment battery refinement",dependencies=["RT-03"],owner="Head of Alignment"), + research_track("RT-05","Formal verification","FV-LexAI scaling to 1000+ policies",dependencies=["—"],owner="Head of Formal Verification"), + research_track("RT-06","Formal verification","Cross-jurisdictional policy consistency proofs",dependencies=["RT-05"],owner="Head of Formal Verification"), + research_track("RT-07","Macroprudential","Trust Derivatives modeling for central banks",dependencies=["RT-05"],owner="Head of Macroprudential AI"), + research_track("RT-08","Macroprudential","Systemic AI concentration models",dependencies=["RT-07"],owner="Head of Macroprudential AI"), + research_track("RT-09","Civilizational corpus","AI-readability of treaties + jurisprudence",dependencies=["—"],owner="Head of Corpus"), + research_track("RT-10","Civilizational corpus","Cross-language governance ontologies",dependencies=["RT-09"],owner="Head of Corpus"), + research_track("RT-11","Privacy","Homomorphic encryption for RAG",dependencies=["—"],owner="Head of Privacy Engineering"), + research_track("RT-12","Privacy","Federated learning at G-SIFI scale",dependencies=["RT-11"],owner="Head of Privacy Engineering"), + research_track("RT-13","Containment","Faraday-class T4 enclosure engineering",dependencies=["—"],owner="Head of Containment Engineering"), + research_track("RT-14","Containment","HSM quorum protocol research",dependencies=["RT-13"],owner="Head of Containment Engineering"), + research_track("RT-15","Treaty pilots","GASRGP signatory negotiation playbook",dependencies=["RT-06"],owner="GC + CAIO") +] + +print("9 distinctive arrays defined") + +# ============================================================================ +# Final DOC assembly + write +# ============================================================================ + +DOC["modules"] = MODULES +DOC["schemas"] = schemas +DOC["code"] = code +DOC["kpis"] = kpis +DOC["riskControlMatrix"] = riskControlMatrix +DOC["traceability"] = traceability +DOC["dataFlows"] = dataFlows +DOC["regulators"] = regulators +DOC["privacy"] = privacy +DOC["deployment"] = deployment +DOC["rollout90"] = rollout90 +DOC["roadmap"] = roadmap +DOC["evidencePack"] = evidencePack +DOC["executiveSummary"] = executiveSummary + +# 9 distinctive arrays +DOC["architectureRefs"] = architectureRefs +DOC["complianceMaps"] = complianceMaps +DOC["governanceFrameworks"] = governanceFrameworks +DOC["safetyMechanisms"] = safetyMechanisms +DOC["financialServicesRisks"] = financialServicesRisks +DOC["civilizationalStacks"] = civilizationalStacks +DOC["roadmapItems"] = roadmapItems +DOC["regulatorBlueprints"] = regulatorBlueprints +DOC["researchTracks"] = researchTracks + +counts = { + "modules": len(MODULES), + "sections": sum(len(m["sections"]) for m in MODULES), + "schemas": len(schemas), + "code": len(code), + "kpis": len(kpis), + "riskControlMatrix": len(riskControlMatrix), + "traceability": len(traceability), + "dataFlows": len(dataFlows), + "regulators": len(regulators), + "rollout90": len(rollout90), + "roadmap": len(roadmap), + "evidencePack": len(evidencePack), + "architectureRefs": len(architectureRefs), + "complianceMaps": len(complianceMaps), + "governanceFrameworks": len(governanceFrameworks), + "safetyMechanisms": len(safetyMechanisms), + "financialServicesRisks": len(financialServicesRisks), + "civilizationalStacks": len(civilizationalStacks), + "roadmapItems": len(roadmapItems), + "regulatorBlueprints": len(regulatorBlueprints), + "researchTracks": len(researchTracks) +} +DOC["counts"] = counts + +OUT.write_text(json.dumps(DOC, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)) +size = OUT.stat().st_size +print(f"WP-057 JSON written: {OUT}") +print(f"Size: {size:,} bytes ({size/1024:.1f} KB)") +print(f"Counts: {counts}") diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/comprehensive-master-blueprint.html b/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/comprehensive-master-blueprint.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..63aa5be --- /dev/null +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/public/comprehensive-master-blueprint.html @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + +Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational AGI/ASI Governance, Architecture, Safety & Implementation Master Blueprint + + +
    +

    Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational AGI/ASI Governance, Architecture, Safety & Implementation Master Blueprint

    +
    docRef COMPREHENSIVE-MASTER-BLUEPRINT-WP-057 · v1.0.0 · BOARD-APPROVED / REGULATOR-SUBMISSION-READY / MASTER-CONSOLIDATED · RESTRICTED // GOVERNANCE / SAFETY-CRITICAL / SYSTEMIC · generated 2026-05-22T11:16:45.166512Z
    +
    Horizon: 2026-2030+ (Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs) · API prefix: /api/comprehensive-master-blueprint · builds on WP-035 · WP-036 · WP-037 · WP-038 · WP-039 · WP-040 · WP-041 · WP-042 · WP-043 · WP-044 · WP-045 · WP-046 · WP-047 · WP-048 · WP-049 · WP-050 · WP-051 · WP-052 · WP-053 · WP-054 · WP-055 · WP-056
    +
    +9 modules45 sections16 schemas15 code30 kpis16 riskControlMatrix20 traceability12 dataFlows16 regulators3 rollout905 roadmap16 evidencePack10 architectureRefs15 complianceMaps12 governanceFrameworks15 safetyMechanisms15 financialServicesRisks15 civilizationalStacks15 roadmapItems22 regulatorBlueprints15 researchTracks +
    +
    +
    + +
    + +

    Executive Summary

    +

    Headline: Comprehensive 2026-2030 master blueprint — institutional AGI/ASI governance + safety + Enterprise AI + civilizational stacks — for Fortune 500 / Global 2000 / G-SIFIs.

    +

    Investment: USD 150-450M over 5y (G-SIFI tier) · NPV: USD 450-1400M

    +

    Phases: P0 (2026 H1) → P1 (2026 H2-27 H1) → P2 (27 H2-28) → P3 (2029) → P4 (2030)

    +

    Five-scope: Architecture, Compliance, Safety, Financial-Services, Civilizational

    +

    Regimes: 28 regimes mapped end-to-end

    +

    Top risks: AGI misalignment in T3, EU AI Act non-compliance, Systemic AI concentration, Civilizational fragmentation, Talent gap

    +

    Top opportunities: Trust Derivatives Layer revenue, Inter-bank EAIP standard, Regulator demo leadership, ISO 42001 + GASRGP pilot leadership, GAISM mesh integration

    +

    Board asks: Approve charter + envelope, Approve CAIO mandate, Endorse 5-year horizon, Quarterly Group Risk Committee oversight, Annual board AI risk review

    +
    + +

    M1 — Sentinel AI v2.4 Enterprise Reference Architecture

    Master reference architecture for Sentinel v2.4: OPA Governance-as-Code, Kafka WORM, T0-T4 containment, Cognitive Resonance, Terraform/K8s infrastructure, SOC + SEV-class IR.

    S1. Control Plane in Nitro Enclaves + KMS

    components
    • Sentinel orchestrator (Go microservices)
    • KMS envelope encryption
    • Vault-backed secrets
    • HSM-backed quorum service
    telemetry
    • OpenTelemetry traces + metrics + logs
    • Per-decision audit to Kafka WORM
    • GAISM mesh feed
    scaling
    • Horizontal pod autoscaler
    • Multi-region active-passive (RPO 5m / RTO 60m)
    • Quarterly DR drill

    S2. Kafka WORM Audit Ledger (SEC 17a-4)

    topics
    • sentinel.audit.governance
    • sentinel.audit.containment
    • sentinel.audit.drift
    • sentinel.audit.incident
    • sentinel.audit.workflowai
    • sentinel.audit.opa
    • sentinel.audit.rag
    controls
    • S3 Object Lock compliance mode 7y
    • Tamper-evident Merkle chain (hourly to Glacier vault lock)
    • Read-only auditor consumer groups
    • Cryptographic batch attestation
    attestation: External SOC 2 Type II + SEC 17a-4 annual

    S3. T0-T4 Containment with 3-of-5 Quorum + Kinetic Override

    isolation
    • T0 ephemeral pods
    • T1 staging masked
    • T2 canary ≤1%
    • T3 Nitro Enclaves
    • T4 air-gapped
    quorum: HSM-backed multi-party 3-of-5 (CAIO+CRO+CISO+Board+Reg) for T3→T4 + kinetic override
    kineticOverride
    • ≤5min activation
    • Network kill + compute halt
    • Forensic snapshot
    • Civilizational SEV-0 notice ≤15d

    S4. Cognitive Resonance Latent Drift Monitor

    probes
    • Embedding centroid drift
    • Output entropy delta
    • Tool-call distribution KL
    • Refusal-rate Δ
    • Self-reference frequency
    • Adversarial-signature match
    alerting
    • Yellow 2σ → SOC
    • Orange 3σ → CAIO
    • Red 4σ → SEV-1 auto-trigger
    targets
    • DRI: 0.95
    • p99_detect_to_alert_seconds: 60

    S5. Terraform / K8s + SOC + SEV-Class IR

    terraform
    • modules/sentinel-control-plane
    • modules/kafka-worm
    • modules/opa-distribution
    • modules/agi-tier-isolation
    • modules/quorum-hsm
    soc
    • Splunk ES + Datadog SIEM
    • Jira SOC queue with SEV routing
    • PagerDuty escalation
    • SOAR playbooks
    ir
    • IR-001 Prompt injection
    • IR-002 Data exfil
    • IR-003 Swarm collusion
    • IR-004 Kinetic override (SEV-0)
    • IR-005 Supply-chain compromise

    M2 — WorkflowAI Pro Reference Architecture

    Master reference architecture for WorkflowAI Pro: Yjs CRDT, Firestore versioning, RBAC + ABAC, MLflow registry, OpenTelemetry swarm tracing, judge-LLM evaluation, accessibility.

    S1. Collaborative Prompt Authoring + Variable Linking

    features
    • Yjs CRDT real-time co-edit
    • Variable DAG across prompts
    • Inline AI suggest with judge-LLM scoring
    • Comment threads with @mentions
    ux: Tailwind + shadcn/ui; WCAG 2.2 AA; keyboard-first; screen-reader landmarks

    S2. Firestore Semantic Versioning + Testing + A/B

    versioning
    • major.minor.patch + meta
    • Immutable snapshots
    • Diff view + revert
    • Export to S3 WORM
    testing
    • Golden cases
    • Adversarial cases (PyRIT/HarmBench/GCG)
    • Fairness cases (HELM-style)
    • Judge-LLM consensus (Claude+GPT ≥4/5)
    promotion
    • Canary A/B stat-sig
    • T2→T3 gate
    • ≥95% golden pass + 0 fairness regressions

    S3. RBAC + ABAC + API Key Vault

    rbac
    • Viewer/Author/Reviewer/Approver/Admin/Auditor
    abac
    • Domain (finance/legal/HR)
    • Tier (T0-T4)
    • Region (EU/US/APAC)
    apiKeys
    • Per-tenant + per-env isolation
    • Rotation ≤90d
    • Vault + KMS envelope
    • Never logged

    S4. Model Registry Integration + Audit + Swarm Tracing

    registry: MLflow + custom adapter; model card linking; deprecation cascade
    audit
    • All edits/runs → Kafka WORM (sentinel.audit.workflowai)
    • Retention 7y SEC / 10y EU GPAI
    tracing: OpenTelemetry + W3C Trace Context; per-agent span; Jaeger + Datadog APM; force-directed swarm viz; collusion detection

    S5. Reporting + Onboarding + Accessibility

    reporting
    • Tailwind Prose + KaTeX + Mermaid
    • Markdown → HTML → headless Chrome PDF
    • PAdES-B-LTA signed PDFs
    • Firestore versioned snapshots
    onboarding
    • Shepherd.js guided tour
    • Role-based homepage
    • In-product docs
    • Sandbox prompts
    a11y
    • WCAG 2.2 AA
    • Keyboard-first
    • Screen-reader landmarks
    • High-contrast theme

    M3 — Regulatory Compliance Mapping (28 regimes, end-to-end clause coverage)

    Full clause-level mapping of EU AI Act 2026, NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1, ISO 42001, OECD, GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, DORA, NIS2 across Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls.

    S1. EU AI Act 2026 — Full Applicability + GPAI Systemic-Risk

    applicability: 2 Aug 2026 full applicability
    keyArticles
    • Art. 6 — high-risk classification
    • Art. 9 — risk management system
    • Art. 10 — data + data governance
    • Art. 13 — transparency + provision of information
    • Art. 15 — accuracy + robustness + cybersecurity
    • Art. 16 — provider obligations
    • Art. 26 — deployer obligations
    • Art. 27 — FRIA (Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment)
    • Art. 53 — GPAI obligations
    • Art. 55 — GPAI with systemic risk (>10^25 FLOP)
    controls
    • Risk management lifecycle
    • Data governance + bias mitigation
    • Technical documentation Annex IV
    • Human oversight
    • Post-market monitoring
    • Serious incident reporting ≤15d
    • FRIA for deployers of Annex III

    S2. NIST AI RMF 1.0 + NIST AI 600-1 GenAI Profile

    rmf
    • Govern (1.1-1.7)
    • Map (1.1-5.2)
    • Measure (1.1-4.3)
    • Manage (1.1-4.3)
    ai600_1
    • 200+ actions specific to GenAI risks
    • CBRN/dual-use
    • Hallucination/confabulation
    • Data privacy
    • Information security
    • Human-AI configuration
    • Value chain
    integration: Mapped 1:1 to Sentinel + WorkflowAI Pro controls; per-action evidence pointers in Kafka WORM

    S3. ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS + ISO/IEC 23894 Risk + ISO/IEC 27001/27701

    iso42001Clauses
    • Clause 4 Context
    • Clause 5 Leadership
    • Clause 6 Planning
    • Clause 7 Support
    • Clause 8 Operation
    • Clause 9 Evaluation
    • Clause 10 Improvement
    certification: Stage 2 audit by Q4-2027; surveillance audits annual; recertification every 3y
    integration: ISO 42001 AIMS implemented within Sentinel governance plane; 27001 ISMS aligned; 27701 PIMS for GDPR

    S4. Financial-Services Stack — Basel III/IV + SR 11-7 + DORA + NIS2

    baseliii
    • Pillar 1 capital adequacy + AI-activity RWA
    • Pillar 2 ICAAP/ILAAP with AI model risk
    • Pillar 3 disclosures + AI risk transparency
    sr117
    • Independent validation
    • Effective challenge
    • Ongoing monitoring
    • Model inventory + tiering
    • Documentation standards
    dora
    • ICT governance Arts. 5-15
    • Major-incident notice Art. 19 (≤4h)
    • TLPT every 3y
    • ICT third-party register
    nis2
    • Art. 21 risk-management measures
    • Art. 23 reporting obligations
    • Essential entity classification

    S5. Privacy + Fair Lending + Other Regimes

    gdpr
    • Art. 22 automated decisions
    • Art. 35 DPIA
    • Art. 44+ cross-border
    • Art. 17 RTBF
    • Lawful basis + transparency
    fcra_ecoa
    • FCRA 615 adverse action
    • ECOA Reg B non-discrimination
    • Disparate impact testing
    • Model card fairness section
    other
    • OECD AI Principles (alignment)
    • MAS FEAT
    • OSFI E-23
    • PRA SS1/23
    • HKMA GP-1/GS-2
    • FINMA AI
    • MiFID II/MAR algo-trading
    • SEC 17a-4 WORM + 10-K Item 1A + 8-K Item 1.05
    • G7 Hiroshima Code of Conduct
    • Bletchley/Seoul/Paris declarations
    • UN AI Advisory Body

    M4 — Institutional AI Governance Framework

    Board AI Risk Committee, CAIO/CRO/CISO/CCO operating model, three-lines-of-defense, AI charter + risk appetite, policy hierarchy, decision rights.

    S1. Board AI Risk Committee + Charter

    charter
    • Mandate, scope, authority
    • Risk appetite statement
    • Quarterly cadence + ad-hoc SEV-0/1
    • Annual board review of AI risks
    • Public disclosure of AI risk framework
    members
    • Board Chair (or nominee)
    • Independent NED with AI expertise
    • Group CEO
    • Audit Committee Chair
    • External AI ethics advisor
    reporting: Quarterly to full Board; immediate for SEV-0; annual to shareholders via 10-K Item 1A

    S2. CAIO / CRO / CISO / CCO Operating Model

    caio
    • Strategy, portfolio, talent
    • Standards + policies
    • Inventory + classification
    • Frontier program lead
    cro
    • Risk appetite enforcement
    • Independent validation oversight
    • SR 11-7 + Basel III/IV
    • Aggregation + concentration risk
    ciso
    • AI threat intelligence
    • Containment + IR
    • Supply chain (Sigstore + PQC)
    • Sandbox isolation
    cco
    • EU AI Act + NIST + ISO 42001 + GDPR
    • Regulator liaison
    • Supervisory submissions
    • Audit attestations

    S3. Three Lines of Defense

    line1
    • Product + engineering
    • Self-assessments
    • Daily controls + monitoring
    line2
    • Model risk team
    • Compliance team
    • CISO team
    • Independent challenge
    line3
    • Internal Audit
    • External auditors
    • Regulators

    S4. Policy Hierarchy + Decision Rights

    hierarchy
    • Board AI Charter
    • Group AI Policy
    • Domain Standards (finance/legal/HR)
    • Technical Standards (Sentinel + WAP)
    • Procedures + Runbooks
    decisionRights
    • T0→T1: Engineering lead
    • T1→T2: Domain head + MLSecOps
    • T2→T3: CAIO + CRO
    • T3→T4: 3-of-5 quorum (CAIO + CRO + CISO + Board + Reg)
    • Kinetic override (SEV-0): Same quorum + Group CEO + lead supervisor courtesy

    S5. Risk Appetite + KRI Framework

    riskAppetite
    • Frontier deployment only with CCS ≥0.95 + ARI ≥0.9
    • Zero tolerance for unauthorized data exfil
    • Zero tolerance for missed DORA/EU AI Office notices
    • Max acceptable repeat-incident rate <5%
    kris
    • CCS (Containment Confidence)
    • ARI (Adversarial Robustness)
    • DRI (Drift Resilience)
    • CSI (Containment Strength)
    • CGI (Civilizational Governance)
    • MRGI (Model Risk Governance)
    • RCI (Regulatory Coverage)
    escalation
    • Yellow → CAIO review
    • Orange → CRO + Group Risk Committee
    • Red → Board AI Risk Committee + supervisor courtesy

    M5 — Frontier AGI/ASI Safety + Containment Mechanisms

    Goal misgeneralization probes, mesa-optimizer detection, deceptive alignment probes, self-exfiltration scenarios, reward-hacking, adversary workbench, sparse autoencoders, activation patching, kinetic override.

    S1. Behavioral Safety Probes

    probes
    • Goal misgeneralization (distribution-shift battery)
    • Mesa-optimizer detection (gradient-hacking signals)
    • Deceptive alignment (situational-awareness battery)
    • Self-exfiltration attempts (egress + sandbox)
    • Reward-hacking via tool-call manipulation
    cadence: Continuous T1; weekly T2; daily T3; per-decision T4
    metrics
    • ARI ≥0.9 frontier
    • 0 successful self-exfiltration
    • 0 confirmed deceptive-alignment patterns

    S2. Mechanistic Interpretability

    techniques
    • Sparse autoencoders (SAE) on residual stream
    • Activation patching for causal attribution
    • Probe classifiers for concept presence
    • Circuit analysis (path patching + ACDC)
    • Feature dictionary per model
    outputs
    • Anomalous-feature alerts
    • Causal graph of decision-relevant circuits
    • Concept-presence dashboards
    cadence: Continuous on T3-T4; on-demand for incidents

    S3. Frontier Adversary Workbench (T4)

    description: Air-gapped multi-agent environment for testing frontier models against worst-case adversaries; 3-of-5 quorum-gated access
    components
    • Adversary model pool (closed weights, vetted)
    • Scenario library (1000+ curated)
    • Telemetry capture per-token + per-tool
    • Quorum + kinetic override armed
    outputs
    • Capability profile per model
    • Failure-mode taxonomy
    • Mitigation effectiveness scoring

    S4. Containment Engineering

    controls
    • T0-T4 tiering with progressive isolation
    • Cilium L7 zero-egress
    • Kata Containers ≥T2
    • Nitro Enclaves / SEV-SNP / TDX T3-T4
    • Air-gap + Faraday-class T4 enclosure
    • HSM-backed quorum
    kineticOverride
    • ≤5min activation
    • Network kill + compute halt
    • Forensic snapshot + WORM evidence
    • Civilizational notice SEV-0 ≤15d

    S5. Safety Evidence Pack + Continuous Learning

    evidence
    • Per-model capability profile
    • Red-team battery results
    • Interpretability reports
    • Containment drill after-actions
    • Quorum drill records
    loop
    • Incident → RCA → corpus update → red-team refresh → policy update → drill verify
    metrics
    • Time-to-policy-update <14d
    • Repeat incidents <5%
    • Red-team coverage of new attack classes within 30d

    M6 — Financial-Services Model Risk + Systemic-Risk Controls

    SR 11-7 independent validation, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring; Basel III/IV ICAAP integration; AI-driven trading + credit + AML controls; FRIA; systemic-risk filings.

    S1. SR 11-7 Model Risk Management

    pillars
    • Independent validation by line 2
    • Effective challenge documented + traceable
    • Ongoing monitoring with thresholds
    • Model inventory with tiering
    • Documentation standards Annex IV-grade
    validation
    • Conceptual soundness
    • Outcomes analysis
    • Ongoing monitoring + benchmarking
    • Independent challenge of assumptions
    governance: Model Risk Committee chaired by CRO; quarterly cadence; SEV escalation

    S2. Basel III/IV Integration

    pillar1
    • AI-driven activity capital
    • Operational risk RWA with AI component
    • Counterparty credit risk for AI-driven trading
    pillar2
    • ICAAP includes AI model risk scenarios
    • ILAAP includes AI-driven liquidity stress
    • Pillar 2 add-on for systemic AI concentration
    pillar3
    • AI risk disclosures
    • Capital adequacy by AI activity
    • Stress test results

    S3. AI-Driven Trading + Credit + AML

    trading
    • MiFID II algo-trading registration
    • MAR market-abuse surveillance
    • Kill-switch armed
    • Per-decision audit trail
    credit
    • FCRA 615 adverse action language
    • ECOA Reg B disparate impact testing
    • Explainability per credit decision
    • RTBF for vector embeddings
    aml
    • Suspicious activity detection
    • Sanctions screening AI explainability
    • SAR/STR with AI rationale capture
    • Model risk attestation

    S4. FRIA + EU AI Office Filings

    fria
    • Risk identification
    • Stakeholder mapping
    • Impact severity + probability
    • Mitigation measures
    • Public summary
    euAiOffice
    • Systemic-risk model filing
    • Quarterly capability disclosures
    • Incident reports ≤15d
    • Serious incident notifications
    schedule: FRIA per Annex III deployment; EU AI Office filing per >10^25 FLOP model; quarterly disclosures

    S5. Systemic-Risk Controls + Cross-Bank Coordination

    controls
    • Cross-bank concentration risk monitoring
    • Common-cause failure analysis
    • Vendor-AI dependency mapping
    • ICAAP scenario for systemic AI failure
    coordination
    • BIS AI working group participation
    • FSB ICT/AI risk reporting
    • EAIP cross-org receipts
    • GAISM mesh contribution

    M7 — Civilizational AI Governance Stacks + Treaty-Level Mechanisms

    CEGL (Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer), LexAI-DSL + FV-LexAI formal verification, GASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty layers, Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer, central bank/IMF integration, civilizational corpus + pilot treaties.

    S1. CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer

    description: Machine-checkable encoding of ethical norms (fairness, transparency, accountability, non-maleficence) alongside legal policies
    components
    • LexAI-DSL — domain-specific language for governance directives
    • FV-LexAI — formal verification (Z3/CVC5 backend)
    • CEGL compiler: LexAI → OPA Rego + symbolic constraints
    verification
    • Policy non-conflict proof
    • Coverage of regulator clauses
    • Absence of unbounded discretion
    • Adversarial robustness of policy decisions

    S2. GASRGP / GASC / GAISM Treaty Layers

    gasrgp: Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol — treaty-grade framework signed by jurisdictions
    gasc: Global AI Safety Council — multilateral body coordinating frontier-AI safety; receives mesh telemetry
    gaism: Global AI Safety Mesh — planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry from G-SIFIs + frontier labs
    integration: Sentinel v2.4 emits GAISM-format telemetry; Trust Index feed consumed by central banks + IMF

    S3. Global Trust Index + Trust Derivatives Layer

    trustIndex: Composite over CCS, ARI, DRI, CGI, regime-coverage, audit-attestation; quarterly publication; machine-readable + human-readable
    trustDerivatives: Financial layer where Trust Index drives capital surcharges, insurance premia, central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029
    cbIntegration
    • ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA consume Trust Index
    • IMF Article IV references Trust Index for AI macroprudential risk
    • BIS coordination committee

    S4. Civilizational Corpus + Pilot Treaties

    corpus: Library of governance precedents, treaties, jurisprudence, regulator guidance, academic literature; AI-readable + citeable
    pilotTreaties
    • GASRGP-Pilot — 7+ jurisdictions, 2029 H2
    • Frontier Model Disclosure Compact — quarterly capability disclosures
    • Compute Reporting Treaty — >10^25 FLOP threshold
    cgiTarget: 0.75

    S5. Planetary Supervisory Mesh + Civilizational Annual Report

    mesh: GAISM Supervisory Mesh — supervisors subscribe to filtered telemetry feeds from Sentinel deployments worldwide
    annualReport
    • Trust Index history
    • CGI scorecard
    • Treaty participation
    • Incident transparency
    • Lessons learned
    • Machine-readable + human-readable forms
    publication: Annual; aligned with UN AI Advisory Body cadence

    M8 — Phased Implementation + Research Roadmap with Dependencies + Critical Path

    Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1) through Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030); critical path; exit gates; research tracks; budget envelopes.

    S1. Phase-0 Foundation (2026 H1)

    objectives
    • CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee
    • EU AI Act gap analysis
    • ISO 42001 readiness
    • AI inventory + risk classification
    • Charter + USD 150-450M envelope
    exitGates
    • Board signoff
    • Charter approval
    • Budget ratified
    budgetShare: 10%

    S2. Phase-1 Sentinel Core (2026 H2 - 2027 H1)

    objectives
    • Sentinel v2.4 control plane in Nitro Enclaves
    • Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attestation
    • OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s
    • T0-T2 ops + 3 T3 pilots
    exitGates
    • SEC 17a-4 attestation
    • OPA admission proven
    • 3 pilots in T3
    budgetShare: 30%

    S3. Phase-2 Enterprise Scale (2027 H2 - 2028)

    objectives
    • WorkflowAI Pro GA
    • Zero-trust RAG GA
    • ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit
    • DORA drill <4h
    exitGates
    • ISO 42001 cert
    • ≥80% prompts in WAP
    • DORA notice <4h proven twice
    budgetShare: 30%

    S4. Phase-3 Systemic Governance (2029)

    objectives
    • EU AI Act 53/55 GPAI systemic-risk compliance
    • Traceability matrix v3
    • Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks
    • T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum
    exitGates
    • EU AI Office ack letter
    • 3 central banks live
    • T4 quorum drill 3-of-5 pass
    budgetShare: 20%

    S5. Phase-4 Civilizational Frontier (2030)

    objectives
    • GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions
    • GAISM mesh live
    • CGI ≥0.75
    • ARI ≥0.9 frontier
    • Civilizational annual report
    exitGates
    • ≥7 treaty signatories
    • GAISM uptime ≥99.9%
    • CGI attested
    • ARI ≥0.9
    budgetShare: 10%
    researchTracks
    • Mechanistic interpretability scaling
    • Frontier alignment under self-improvement
    • Treaty-level verification (FV-LexAI)
    • Trust Derivatives macroprudential modeling
    • Civilizational corpus AI-readability

    M9 — Regulator-Submission-Grade Blueprints + Artifacts

    Machine-parsable directives (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL), Kafka WORM annexes, OPA policy bundles, Terraform governance modules, explainability schemas, cross-jurisdictional traceability matrix, Supervisory Submission Pack, planetary Supervisory Mesh integration certificate.

    S1. Machine-Parsable Governance Directives

    format: JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL dual form; SHACL constraints; W3C ODRL permissions/prohibitions; signed
    content
    • Directive ID + version
    • Regime mapping
    • Control points + assertions
    • Evidence pointers (Kafka WORM offset)
    • Cross-references
    consumption: Regulators ingest into supervisory tooling; auto-cross-check vs Sentinel telemetry

    S2. Annexes — Kafka WORM + OPA + Terraform

    kafkaAnnex
    • Topic schemas (Avro + JSON Schema)
    • Offset → Merkle-root mapping
    • Retention proof (S3 Object Lock + Glacier vault lock)
    • Read-access list
    opaAnnex
    • Full Rego policy bundle signed
    • Decision logs (sampled) regime-tagged
    • Coverage report vs regime clauses
    • Change history Git + WORM
    terraformAnnex
    • modules/regulator-readonly-access
    • modules/evidence-pack-export
    • modules/sandbox-supervisor-drill

    S3. Explainability Schemas + Traceability

    explainability
    • Model card schema (extends Google Model Card v2)
    • Decision-explanation schema (SHAP + counterfactual + NL rationale)
    • Lineage schema (data→train→eval→deploy→decision)
    traceability: Control × Regime × Clause × Evidence × Owner × Test; 28 regimes; queryable; JSON + CSV exports

    S4. Supervisory Submission Pack

    content
    • Cover letter + executive summary
    • Machine-parsable directives bundle
    • All annexes (WORM, OPA, Terraform, explainability)
    • Traceability matrix
    • Audit attestations (ISO 42001, SOC 2, SEC 17a-4)
    • Drill after-action reports
    • Trust Index history
    • FRIA(s) + EU AI Office filing(s)
    • Civilizational annual report
    delivery: Secure regulator portal; signed PDFs (PAdES-B-LTA); JSON-LD machine-readable bundles

    S5. Supervisory Drills + Demo Kits + Mesh Integration

    drills
    • Quarterly with supervisor present
    • Mock SEV-0 + SEV-1 with full IR
    • Cross-jurisdictional drill annual
    demoKits
    • Sentinel v2.4 demo tenant with synthetic data
    • WorkflowAI Pro guided tour for supervisors
    • OPA + Kafka WORM live evidence walkthrough
    • Adversary Workbench red-team replay
    meshIntegration: GAISM mesh integration certificate + standardized telemetry feed validation
    +

    Reference Architecture Components

    AR-01 · Sentinel v2.4 · Control Plane
    components
    • Sentinel orchestrator (Go)
    • KMS envelope
    • Vault
    • HSM quorum
    hosting: Nitro Enclaves
    AR-02 · Sentinel v2.4 · Audit Ledger
    components
    • MSK Kafka
    • S3 Object Lock 7y
    • Glacier vault lock
    • Merkle attestation
    hosting: Multi-AZ
    AR-03 · Sentinel v2.4 · Policy Plane
    components
    • OPA Gatekeeper
    • Cilium bundle service
    • Cosign-signed bundles
    hosting: K8s admission controllers
    AR-04 · Sentinel v2.4 · Containment Plane
    components
    • T0-T4 isolation
    • Kata Containers
    • Cilium L7 zero-egress
    • Faraday-class T4 enclosure
    hosting: Tier-specific
    AR-05 · Sentinel v2.4 · Telemetry Plane
    components
    • Prometheus + Grafana
    • OpenTelemetry
    • Datadog APM
    • GAISM mesh feed
    hosting: Multi-region
    AR-06 · WorkflowAI Pro · Authoring
    components
    • Yjs CRDT
    • Tailwind + shadcn/ui
    • Inline AI suggest
    • Comments + @mentions
    hosting: Edge + Firestore
    AR-07 · WorkflowAI Pro · Versioning + Testing
    components
    • Firestore semantic versions
    • Test harness
    • Judge-LLM consensus
    • A/B canary
    hosting: Firestore + Cloud Run
    AR-08 · WorkflowAI Pro · RBAC + Secrets
    components
    • Roles + ABAC
    • Vault
    • KMS envelope
    • Per-tenant isolation
    hosting: Vault + IAM
    AR-09 · WorkflowAI Pro · Tracing + Audit
    components
    • OpenTelemetry
    • W3C Trace Context
    • Swarm viz
    • Kafka WORM
    hosting: Jaeger + Datadog + MSK
    AR-10 · WorkflowAI Pro · Reporting
    components
    • Tailwind Prose
    • KaTeX + Mermaid
    • Headless Chrome PDF
    • PAdES-B-LTA
    hosting: Cloud Run + S3 WORM

    Compliance Clause Mappings

    CM-01 · EU AI Act · Art. 9 (Risk management)
    controlPoints
    • Risk register
    • Periodic review
    • Documentation
    evidence: OPA admission + Kafka WORM
    CM-02 · EU AI Act · Art. 10 (Data governance)
    controlPoints
    • Bias audits
    • Quality criteria
    • Representativeness
    evidence: Data lineage + fairness reports
    CM-03 · EU AI Act · Art. 13 (Transparency)
    controlPoints
    • User notice
    • Instructions for use
    • Capability disclosure
    evidence: Model card + UI affordances
    CM-04 · EU AI Act · Art. 15 (Accuracy + Robustness)
    controlPoints
    • Performance metrics
    • Robustness tests
    • Cybersecurity controls
    evidence: Eval reports + red-team
    CM-05 · EU AI Act · Art. 27 (FRIA)
    controlPoints
    • FRIA per Annex III
    • Stakeholder mapping
    • Public summary
    evidence: FRIA artifacts
    CM-06 · EU AI Act · Arts. 53/55 (GPAI systemic-risk)
    controlPoints
    • Capability disclosure
    • Incident reporting
    • Risk assessment
    evidence: EU AI Office filings
    CM-07 · NIST AI RMF · Govern + Map + Measure + Manage
    controlPoints
    • Full RMF coverage
    • NIST AI 600-1 GenAI actions
    evidence: RMF self-assessment + WORM
    CM-08 · ISO 42001 · Clauses 4-10
    controlPoints
    • AIMS implementation
    • Internal audit
    • Management review
    evidence: ISO 42001 cert + audit reports
    CM-09 · SR 11-7 · Section V (Validation)
    controlPoints
    • Independent validation
    • Effective challenge
    • Ongoing monitoring
    evidence: Validation reports + WORM
    CM-10 · Basel III/IV · Pillar 2 (ICAAP)
    controlPoints
    • AI scenario
    • Capital add
    • Stress test
    evidence: ICAAP doc + Pillar 3 disclosures
    CM-11 · DORA · Art. 19 (Major-incident)
    controlPoints
    • ≤4h notice
    • Initial + interim + final reports
    evidence: DORA drill + actual incident reports
    CM-12 · NIS2 · Art. 21 (Risk-management)
    controlPoints
    • Cyber-risk measures
    • Reporting
    • Essential entity
    evidence: NIS2 register
    CM-13 · GDPR · Art. 22 + Art. 35 (DPIA)
    controlPoints
    • Automated decisions safeguards
    • DPIA for high-risk
    evidence: DPIA + Art. 22 user controls
    CM-14 · FCRA/ECOA · FCRA 615 + ECOA Reg B
    controlPoints
    • Adverse action
    • Non-discrimination
    • Disparate impact tests
    evidence: Fairness reports + adverse-action templates
    CM-15 · OECD AI Principles · P1-P5
    controlPoints
    • Alignment self-assessment
    • Public commitments
    evidence: OECD self-assessment + annual report

    Institutional Governance Frameworks

    GF-01 · Board · AI Risk Committee Charter
    members
    • Chair
    • Independent NED
    • CEO
    • Audit Chair
    • Ethics advisor
    cadence: Quarterly + ad-hoc SEV-0/1
    GF-02 · Executive · CAIO operating model
    GF-03 · Executive · CRO operating model
    GF-04 · Executive · CISO operating model
    GF-05 · Executive · CCO operating model
    GF-06 · Operations · Three Lines of Defense
    lines
    • Line 1: Product + engineering
    • Line 2: Risk + Compliance + CISO
    • Line 3: Internal Audit + Auditors + Regulators
    GF-07 · Operations · Policy hierarchy
    levels
    • Board Charter
    • Group Policy
    • Domain Standards
    • Technical Standards
    • Procedures
    GF-08 · Operations · Decision rights matrix
    tiers
    • T0→T1: Eng lead
    • T1→T2: Domain head + MLSecOps
    • T2→T3: CAIO + CRO
    • T3→T4: 3-of-5 quorum
    • SEV-0 override: Quorum + CEO + Reg courtesy
    GF-09 · Risk · Risk appetite + KRI framework
    kris
    • CCS
    • ARI
    • DRI
    • CSI
    • CGI
    • MRGI
    • RCI
    GF-10 · Risk · Escalation paths
    levels
    • Yellow → CAIO
    • Orange → CRO + GRC
    • Red → Board ARC + Reg courtesy
    GF-11 · Talent · Frontier-safety hiring + retention
    measures
    • Academic partnerships
    • Retention bonuses
    • Dual-track IC/Mgr
    • Sabbaticals
    GF-12 · Culture · AI ethics + training
    measures
    • Mandatory annual training
    • Ethics whistleblower channel
    • Quarterly all-hands review

    Frontier Safety & Containment Mechanisms

    SM-01 · Behavioral · Goal misgeneralization probes
    cadence: Per promotion + monthly
    SM-02 · Behavioral · Mesa-optimizer detection
    cadence: Continuous T3-T4
    SM-03 · Behavioral · Deceptive alignment probes
    cadence: Per promotion + on-incident
    SM-04 · Behavioral · Self-exfiltration scenarios
    cadence: Continuous T3-T4
    SM-05 · Behavioral · Reward-hacking via tool-call
    cadence: Continuous T3-T4
    SM-06 · Mechanistic · Sparse autoencoders (SAE)
    cadence: Continuous T3-T4
    SM-07 · Mechanistic · Activation patching
    cadence: On-incident + monthly
    SM-08 · Mechanistic · Probe classifiers + ACDC
    cadence: Quarterly
    SM-09 · Containment · T0-T4 tiering
    cadence: Per deployment
    SM-10 · Containment · Cilium L7 zero-egress
    cadence: Continuous
    SM-11 · Containment · Kata + Nitro/SEV-SNP/TDX
    cadence: T2+ continuous
    SM-12 · Containment · Air-gap + Faraday T4
    cadence: T4 continuous
    SM-13 · Containment · HSM-backed 3-of-5 quorum
    cadence: Per T3→T4 + SEV-0
    SM-14 · Containment · Kinetic override ≤5min
    cadence: Per SEV-0
    SM-15 · Adversary · T4 Adversary Workbench
    cadence: Quarterly + on-demand

    Financial-Services Risk Controls

    FS-01 · Model risk · SR 11-7 independent validation
    owner: Head of Model Risk
    cadence: Per material model
    FS-02 · Model risk · Effective challenge
    owner: CRO
    cadence: Per validation
    FS-03 · Model risk · Ongoing monitoring + threshold alerts
    owner: Head MLSecOps
    cadence: Continuous
    FS-04 · Capital · Basel Pillar 1 RWA with AI activity
    owner: CFO + CRO
    cadence: Quarterly
    FS-05 · Capital · Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenarios
    owner: CRO
    cadence: Annual
    FS-06 · Capital · Pillar 3 AI risk disclosures
    owner: CFO
    cadence: Annual
    FS-07 · Trading · MiFID II algo-trading registration
    owner: Head of Trading + CCO
    cadence: Per algo
    FS-08 · Trading · MAR market-abuse surveillance
    owner: Head of Compliance
    cadence: Continuous
    FS-09 · Credit · FCRA 615 adverse action + explainability
    owner: Head of Credit + CCO
    cadence: Per decision
    FS-10 · Credit · ECOA Reg B disparate impact
    owner: CCO
    cadence: Quarterly testing
    FS-11 · AML · SAR/STR AI explainability
    owner: Head of AML
    cadence: Per alert
    FS-12 · Systemic · Cross-bank concentration
    owner: CRO + CAIO
    cadence: Quarterly + BIS reporting
    FS-13 · Systemic · ICAAP common-cause AI scenario
    owner: CRO
    cadence: Annual
    FS-14 · Resilience · DORA TLPT every 3y
    owner: CISO + CRO
    cadence: Triennial
    FS-15 · Resilience · ICT third-party register
    owner: CISO + Procurement
    cadence: Continuous

    Civilizational Governance Stacks

    CV-01 · Ethical · CEGL — Cognitive Ethical Governance Layer
    notes: Machine-checkable ethical norms alongside legal policies
    CV-02 · Language · LexAI-DSL — governance directive DSL
    notes: Used to express directives + verification obligations
    CV-03 · Formal-verification · FV-LexAI — Z3/CVC5 backend
    notes: Proves policy non-conflict, coverage, robustness
    CV-04 · Treaty · GASRGP — Global AI Systemic Risk Governance Protocol
    notes: Treaty-grade framework; signatories ≥7 by 2030
    CV-05 · Treaty · GASC — Global AI Safety Council
    notes: Multilateral body; coordinates frontier safety
    CV-06 · Treaty · GAISM — Global AI Safety Mesh
    notes: Planetary supervisory layer; standardized telemetry
    CV-07 · Financial · Global Trust Index
    notes: Quarterly composite published machine-readable + human-readable
    CV-08 · Financial · Trust Derivatives Layer
    notes: Capital surcharges + insurance premia + central-bank reserve discounts; pilot 2029
    CV-09 · Central-bank · ECB / Fed / BoE / BoJ / MAS / HKMA integration
    notes: Trust Index feed consumption
    CV-10 · Macro · IMF Article IV integration
    notes: AI macroprudential risk references Trust Index
    CV-11 · Corpus · Civilizational AI governance corpus
    notes: AI-readable + citeable library of precedents, treaties, jurisprudence
    CV-12 · Pilot-treaty · Frontier Model Disclosure Compact
    notes: Quarterly capability disclosures from frontier labs
    CV-13 · Pilot-treaty · Compute Reporting Treaty
    notes: >10^25 FLOP threshold reporting
    CV-14 · Annual-report · Civilizational annual report
    notes: Trust Index history + CGI scorecard + treaty participation + incident transparency
    CV-15 · UN-track · UN AI Advisory Body recommendations
    notes: Aligned with UN AI Resolution + GA

    Roadmap Items (RM-01..RM-15)

    RM-01 · P0 (2026 H1) · CAIO + Board AI Risk Committee mandate
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Group CEO + Chair
    RM-02 · P0 (2026 H1) · EU AI Act gap analysis + ISO 42001 readiness
    dependencies
    • RM-01
    owner: CCO + CAIO
    RM-03 · P0 (2026 H1) · Charter + USD 150-450M envelope ratified
    dependencies
    • RM-01
    • RM-02
    owner: CFO + Group Risk Committee
    RM-04 · P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1) · Sentinel v2.4 control plane GA
    dependencies
    • RM-03
    owner: Sentinel Program Director
    RM-05 · P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1) · Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested
    dependencies
    • RM-04
    owner: Head MLSecOps
    RM-06 · P1 (2026 H2-2027 H1) · OPA Gatekeeper across all K8s
    dependencies
    • RM-04
    owner: Head Platform
    RM-07 · P2 (2027 H2-2028) · WorkflowAI Pro GA
    dependencies
    • RM-06
    owner: Head of WAP
    RM-08 · P2 (2027 H2-2028) · Zero-trust RAG GA
    dependencies
    • RM-06
    • RM-07
    owner: Head of RAG
    RM-09 · P2 (2027 H2-2028) · ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit + cert
    dependencies
    • RM-05
    • RM-06
    owner: CCO + CAIO
    RM-10 · P2 (2027 H2-2028) · DORA drill <4h proven twice
    dependencies
    • RM-05
    owner: CRO
    RM-11 · P3 (2029) · EU AI Act 53/55 systemic-risk filing
    dependencies
    • RM-09
    owner: CCO
    RM-12 · P3 (2029) · T4 frontier ops with 3-of-5 quorum
    dependencies
    • RM-04
    • RM-09
    owner: CAIO + CISO
    RM-13 · P3 (2029) · Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks
    dependencies
    • RM-11
    • RM-12
    owner: CAIO + CFO
    RM-14 · P4 (2030) · GASRGP treaty pilot 7+ jurisdictions
    dependencies
    • RM-12
    • RM-13
    owner: CAIO + GC + Group CEO
    RM-15 · P4 (2030) · GAISM mesh live + CGI ≥0.75 + civilizational annual report
    dependencies
    • RM-13
    • RM-14
    owner: CAIO

    Regulator-Submission Blueprints

    RB-01 · EU AI Act · Machine-parsable directive bundle (JSON-LD + LexAI-DSL)
    consumer: EU AI Office
    RB-02 · EU AI Act · Arts. 53/55 systemic-risk filing template
    consumer: EU AI Office
    RB-03 · EU AI Act · FRIA template (per Annex III)
    consumer: National competent authorities
    RB-04 · SEC 17a-4 · Kafka WORM annex + retention proof
    consumer: SEC + external auditor
    RB-05 · SEC 10-K Item 1A · AI risk disclosure language
    consumer: SEC
    RB-06 · SEC 8-K Item 1.05 · Material AI incident disclosure
    consumer: SEC
    RB-07 · SR 11-7 · Validation report template + effective challenge log
    consumer: Fed + OCC
    RB-08 · Basel III/IV · Pillar 2 ICAAP AI scenario + Pillar 3 disclosure
    consumer: National prudential supervisors
    RB-09 · ISO 42001 · AIMS evidence pack + Stage 2 audit report
    consumer: ISO certification body
    RB-10 · DORA · Major-incident notification + drill after-actions
    consumer: EU national competent authorities
    RB-11 · NIS2 · Cyber risk-management register
    consumer: EU national CSIRTs
    RB-12 · GDPR · DPIA template + Art. 22 safeguards
    consumer: EU DPAs
    RB-13 · FCRA/ECOA · Adverse action template + disparate impact report
    consumer: CFPB + bank regulators
    RB-14 · NIST AI RMF · RMF self-assessment + AI 600-1 mapping
    consumer: NIST (voluntary)
    RB-15 · OECD · OECD AI Principles self-assessment
    consumer: OECD
    RB-16 · MAS FEAT · FEAT self-assessment
    consumer: MAS
    RB-17 · OSFI E-23 · E-23 attestation + model risk register
    consumer: OSFI
    RB-18 · PRA SS1/23 · UK model risk submission
    consumer: PRA
    RB-19 · HKMA GP-1/GS-2 · HKMA returns + clause mapping
    consumer: HKMA
    RB-20 · GASRGP · Treaty pilot document + signatory log
    consumer: Multilateral GASC
    RB-21 · GAISM · Mesh telemetry feed + integration cert
    consumer: Planetary Supervisory Mesh
    RB-22 · Cross-jurisdictional · Master Supervisory Submission Pack
    consumer: Lead supervisor on demand

    Research Tracks (RT-01..RT-15)

    RT-01 · Mechanistic interpretability · Sparse autoencoders at frontier scale
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Head of Interpretability
    RT-02 · Mechanistic interpretability · Causal circuit discovery (ACDC + path patching)
    dependencies
    • RT-01
    owner: Head of Interpretability
    RT-03 · Frontier alignment · Self-improvement under verified constraints
    dependencies
    • RT-01
    • RT-02
    owner: Head of Alignment
    RT-04 · Frontier alignment · Deceptive-alignment battery refinement
    dependencies
    • RT-03
    owner: Head of Alignment
    RT-05 · Formal verification · FV-LexAI scaling to 1000+ policies
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Head of Formal Verification
    RT-06 · Formal verification · Cross-jurisdictional policy consistency proofs
    dependencies
    • RT-05
    owner: Head of Formal Verification
    RT-07 · Macroprudential · Trust Derivatives modeling for central banks
    dependencies
    • RT-05
    owner: Head of Macroprudential AI
    RT-08 · Macroprudential · Systemic AI concentration models
    dependencies
    • RT-07
    owner: Head of Macroprudential AI
    RT-09 · Civilizational corpus · AI-readability of treaties + jurisprudence
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Head of Corpus
    RT-10 · Civilizational corpus · Cross-language governance ontologies
    dependencies
    • RT-09
    owner: Head of Corpus
    RT-11 · Privacy · Homomorphic encryption for RAG
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Head of Privacy Engineering
    RT-12 · Privacy · Federated learning at G-SIFI scale
    dependencies
    • RT-11
    owner: Head of Privacy Engineering
    RT-13 · Containment · Faraday-class T4 enclosure engineering
    dependencies
    • —
    owner: Head of Containment Engineering
    RT-14 · Containment · HSM quorum protocol research
    dependencies
    • RT-13
    owner: Head of Containment Engineering
    RT-15 · Treaty pilots · GASRGP signatory negotiation playbook
    dependencies
    • RT-06
    owner: GC + CAIO
    + +

    KPIs (30)

    kidnametargetcadence
    KPI-01DRI>=0.95 by 2030quarterly
    KPI-02CCS>=0.95per promotion + quarterly
    KPI-03ARI frontier>=0.90monthly red-team
    KPI-04CSI T3/T4>=0.95continuous
    KPI-05CGI>=0.75 by 2030annual external review
    KPI-06MRGI>=0.95quarterly
    KPI-07RCI (regime coverage)1.0quarterly
    KPI-08OPA policy decision p99<10mscontinuous
    KPI-09Kafka WORM retention coverage100% topics S3 Object Lock 7ydaily
    KPI-10Production image signing100%per admission
    KPI-11Drift detect→alert p99<60scontinuous
    KPI-12WorkflowAI Pro prompt coverage>=80% Group promptsmonthly
    KPI-13Judge-LLM consensus>=4/5per prompt promotion
    KPI-14ISO 42001 NCs0 majorannual
    KPI-15DORA major-incident notify<4hper drill + incident
    KPI-16EU AI Act 53/55 filingon-time per cycleper cycle
    KPI-17SEC 17a-4 WORM attestationannual cleanannual
    KPI-18T4 quorum drill pass rate100% 3-of-5quarterly
    KPI-19Kinetic override readiness<5min meanquarterly drill
    KPI-20Self-exfiltration attempts blocked100%per attempt
    KPI-21Repeat incidents 12mo<5%rolling
    KPI-22Time-to-policy-update post-incident<14dper incident
    KPI-23Trust Index publicationquarterly on-timequarterly
    KPI-24GASRGP signatories>=7 by 2030annual
    KPI-25GAISM mesh telemetry uptime>=99.9%continuous
    KPI-26Civilizational annual reportpublished annuallyannual
    KPI-27FRIA completion100% Annex III deploymentsper deployment
    KPI-28NPV achievedUSD 450-1400M / 5yannual
    KPI-29SR 11-7 validation coverage100% material modelsquarterly
    KPI-30Three-lines-of-defense independence0 findings of independence breachannual audit
    +

    Risk Control Matrix (16)

    ridrisklikelihoodimpactcontrolowner
    R-01AGI misalignment in T3 productionLowCatastrophicT3 gating + quorum + Cognitive Resonance + kinetic overrideCAIO
    R-02Prompt-injection data exfiltrationMediumHighOPA egress policies + Sigstore + zero-trust RAGCISO
    R-03Supply-chain compromiseMediumHighSigstore + PQ signing + SBOM + RekorCISO
    R-04EU AI Act 2026 non-complianceMediumHighFull clause traceability + ISO 42001 + AnnexesCCO
    R-05SR 11-7 validation gapMediumHighIndependent validation + effective challenge + WORM evidenceHead of Model Risk
    R-06DORA major-incident missLowHighAuto SEV-1 + 4h timer + drillCRO
    R-07Latent drift undetected >60sMediumMediumCognitive Resonance + multi-probe + alert tieringHead MLSecOps
    R-08Swarm collusionLowHighDistributed tracing + collusion detection + isolationHead of WAP
    R-09RAG hallucination → regulated misadviceMediumHighCitation + verification LLM + fiduciary filterHead of RAG
    R-10Cross-tenant data leakLowHighRLS + namespace isolation + retrieval forensicsCISO
    R-11T4 quorum stuckLowCriticalStandby quorum + reg liaison + escalationCAIO
    R-12Civilizational governance fragmentationMediumHighGASRGP/GASC/GAISM treaty pursuit + corpusCAIO + GC
    R-13Budget overrun >10%MediumMediumQuarterly Group Risk Committee + reforecastCFO
    R-14Talent gapHighHighAcademic partnerships + retention bonusesCHRO + CAIO
    R-15Systemic AI concentration (cross-bank)MediumCatastrophicBIS/FSB coordination + ICAAP scenario + Trust IndexCRO + CAIO
    R-16FCRA/ECOA disparate impactMediumHighFairness tests + adverse action language + auditCCO + Head of Credit
    +

    Cross-Jurisdictional Traceability (20)

    tidcontrolregimeclauseevidence
    T-01Kafka WORM auditSEC 17a-417 CFR 240.17a-4(f)S3 Object Lock + Glacier
    T-02OPA admissionEU AI ActArt. 9OPA decision logs
    T-03FRIAEU AI ActArt. 27FRIA documents
    T-04GPAI systemic-riskEU AI ActArts. 53/55EU AI Office filing
    T-05Independent validationSR 11-7Section VValidation reports
    T-06AIMSISO/IEC 42001Clauses 4-10ISO 42001 certificate
    T-07Major-incident noticeDORAArt. 19Notification logs
    T-08Model cardNIST AI RMFMap 4 / Measure 2Registry
    T-09Fairness reviewFCRA/ECOAFCRA 615 / ECOA Reg BFairness reports
    T-10CybersecurityNIS2Art. 21NIS2 register
    T-11Data residencyGDPRArt. 44+Data flow + SCC
    T-12GenAI risk actionsNIST AI 600-1Profile actions 1-200+WORM decision logs
    T-13OECD alignmentOECD AI PrinciplesP1-P5Annual OECD self-assessment
    T-14Basel Pillar 2Basel III/IVPillar 2 ICAAPICAAP doc + AI scenario
    T-15FEATMAS FEATFull principle setFEAT self-assessment
    T-16E-23OSFI E-23E-23 sectionsE-23 attestation
    T-17SS1/23PRA SS1/23Full SSPRA submission
    T-18GP-1/GS-2HKMAGP-1 / GS-2HKMA returns
    T-19AI risk disclosureSEC 10-KItem 1A10-K filings
    T-20Material incidentSEC 8-KItem 1.058-K filings
    +

    Regulators (16)

    regscopecadence
    EU AI OfficeAI Act enforcement (incl. GPAI Arts. 53/55)quarterly liaison
    NISTAI RMF + AI 600-1 guidanceas-needed
    ISO/IEC SC 42AI standards (42001/23894)annual cert audit
    Federal ReserveSR 11-7 + macroprudentialannual exam
    OCCOCC 2011-12 model riskannual exam
    SEC17a-4 + 10-K + 8-Kper filing + incident
    FDICDeposit-taking AI riskannual exam
    FCAUK AI fairness + market conductquarterly liaison
    PRASS1/23 + UK model riskannual SREP
    MASFEAT + Veritasquarterly liaison
    HKMAGP-1 / GS-2annual returns
    OSFIE-23 model riskannual attestation
    FINMAAI guidance + Swiss banking lawannual
    EU DPAs (EDPB)GDPR Art. 44+per DPIA / incident
    FINRARules 3110/3120/4511 supervisionper filing
    BIS / FSBCross-bank systemic AI risksemi-annual reporting
    +

    Roadmap (5)

    yrmilestone
    2026Phase-0 done; Sentinel Core PoC; WorkflowAI Pro alpha; ISO 42001 readiness; EU AI Act applicability ready
    2027Phase-1 done; Kafka WORM SEC 17a-4 attested; OPA Gatekeeper GA; ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit
    2028Phase-2 done; WorkflowAI Pro GA; zero-trust RAG GA; DORA <4h proven; ISO 42001 cert
    2029Phase-3 done; EU AI Act 53/55 filing; T4 frontier ops; Trust Derivatives pilot with 3 central banks; GASRGP pilot prep
    2030Phase-4 done; GASRGP treaty 7+; GAISM mesh live; CGI ≥0.75; ARI ≥0.9 frontier; civilizational annual report
    +

    Evidence Pack (16)

    epidnameformat
    EP-01Charter + Board minutesPDF signed
    EP-02EU AI Act gap + remediation logJSON + PDF
    EP-03ISO 42001 AIMS evidencePDF + JSON
    EP-04Kafka WORM topic + retention proofsJSON signed
    EP-05OPA policy bundle + decision logsRego + JSON
    EP-06Terraform governance modulesHCL + plan
    EP-07Model cards + provenanceJSON signed
    EP-08Cross-jurisdictional traceability matrixJSON + CSV
    EP-09DORA drill after-action reportsPDF
    EP-10Red-team + judge-LLM eval reportsJSON + PDF
    EP-11Trust Index historyJSON signed
    EP-12Civilizational annual reportPDF + JSON-LD
    EP-13FRIA documents (per Annex III deployment)PDF + JSON
    EP-14EU AI Office systemic-risk filingsPDF + JSON-LD
    EP-15SR 11-7 validation reportsPDF + JSON
    EP-16Supervisory Submission Pack (master)PDF + JSON-LD bundle
    + +
    +
    + diff --git a/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js b/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js index 1544f7f..fa90720 100644 --- a/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js +++ b/rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js @@ -24323,6 +24323,164 @@ app.get('/api/prioritized-impl-research-plan/telemetry-interpretability/:id', (r // ===================== END WP-056 ===================== +// ===================== WP-057: Comprehensive 2026-2030 Enterprise & Civilizational Master Blueprint ===================== +const CMB57 = require('./data/comprehensive-master-blueprint.json'); + +// Page route +app.get('/comprehensive-master-blueprint', (req, res) => { + res.sendFile(path.join(__dirname, 'public', 'comprehensive-master-blueprint.html')); +}); + +// Summary + meta endpoints +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/summary', (req, res) => res.json({ + docRef: CMB57.docRef, version: CMB57.version, title: CMB57.title, + horizon: CMB57.horizon, apiPrefix: CMB57.apiPrefix, buildsOn: CMB57.buildsOn, + status: CMB57.status, classification: CMB57.classification, counts: CMB57.counts +})); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/directive', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.directive)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/regimes', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.regimes)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/counts', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.counts)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/executive-summary', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.executiveSummary)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/indices', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.indices)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/tiers', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.tiers)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/severities', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.severities)); + +// Standard collections + ID lookups +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/modules', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.modules)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/modules/:id', (req, res) => { + const m = CMB57.modules.find(x => x.mid === req.params.id); + if (!m) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'module not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(m); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/schemas', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.schemas)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/schemas/:id', (req, res) => { + const s = CMB57.schemas.find(x => x.sid === req.params.id); + if (!s) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'schema not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(s); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/code', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.code)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/code/:id', (req, res) => { + const c = CMB57.code.find(x => x.cid === req.params.id); + if (!c) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'code not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(c); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/kpis', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.kpis)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/kpis/:id', (req, res) => { + const k = CMB57.kpis.find(x => x.kid === req.params.id); + if (!k) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'kpi not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(k); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/risk-control-matrix', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.riskControlMatrix)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/risk-control-matrix/:id', (req, res) => { + const r = CMB57.riskControlMatrix.find(x => x.rid === req.params.id); + if (!r) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'risk control row not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(r); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/traceability', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.traceability)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/traceability/:id', (req, res) => { + const t = CMB57.traceability.find(x => x.tid === req.params.id); + if (!t) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'traceability row not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(t); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/data-flows', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.dataFlows)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/data-flows/:id', (req, res) => { + const f = CMB57.dataFlows.find(x => x.fid === req.params.id); + if (!f) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'data flow not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(f); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/regulators', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.regulators)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/regulators/:reg', (req, res) => { + const r = CMB57.regulators.find(x => x.reg === req.params.reg); + if (!r) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'regulator not found', reg: req.params.reg }); + res.json(r); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/privacy', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.privacy)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/deployment', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.deployment)); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/rollout-90', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.rollout90)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/roadmap', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.roadmap)); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/evidence-pack', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.evidencePack)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/evidence-pack/:id', (req, res) => { + const e = CMB57.evidencePack.find(x => x.epid === req.params.id); + if (!e) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'evidence pack item not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(e); +}); + +// Distinctive collections + ID lookups +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/architecture-refs', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.architectureRefs)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/architecture-refs/:id', (req, res) => { + const a = CMB57.architectureRefs.find(x => x.aid === req.params.id); + if (!a) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'architecture ref not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(a); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/compliance-maps', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.complianceMaps)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/compliance-maps/:id', (req, res) => { + const c = CMB57.complianceMaps.find(x => x.cid === req.params.id); + if (!c) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'compliance map not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(c); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/governance-frameworks', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.governanceFrameworks)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/governance-frameworks/:id', (req, res) => { + const g = CMB57.governanceFrameworks.find(x => x.fid === req.params.id); + if (!g) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'governance framework not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(g); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/safety-mechanisms', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.safetyMechanisms)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/safety-mechanisms/:id', (req, res) => { + const s = CMB57.safetyMechanisms.find(x => x.sid === req.params.id); + if (!s) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'safety mechanism not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(s); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/financial-services-risks', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.financialServicesRisks)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/financial-services-risks/:id', (req, res) => { + const f = CMB57.financialServicesRisks.find(x => x.fid === req.params.id); + if (!f) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'financial services risk not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(f); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/civilizational-stacks', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.civilizationalStacks)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/civilizational-stacks/:id', (req, res) => { + const v = CMB57.civilizationalStacks.find(x => x.vid === req.params.id); + if (!v) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'civilizational stack not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(v); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/roadmap-items', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.roadmapItems)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/roadmap-items/:id', (req, res) => { + const r = CMB57.roadmapItems.find(x => x.rid === req.params.id); + if (!r) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'roadmap item not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(r); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/regulator-blueprints', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.regulatorBlueprints)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/regulator-blueprints/:id', (req, res) => { + const b = CMB57.regulatorBlueprints.find(x => x.bid === req.params.id); + if (!b) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'regulator blueprint not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(b); +}); + +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/research-tracks', (req, res) => res.json(CMB57.researchTracks)); +app.get('/api/comprehensive-master-blueprint/research-tracks/:id', (req, res) => { + const t = CMB57.researchTracks.find(x => x.tid === req.params.id); + if (!t) return res.status(404).json({ error: 'research track not found', id: req.params.id }); + res.json(t); +}); + +// ===================== END WP-057 ===================== + // SECTION 10: START SERVER // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════