Conversation
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This pull request fails to fulfill its stated intent of updating the GraalVM native image version. Although the title indicates a version bump, the actual changes are limited to removing trailing whitespace in the 'dev' stage of the Dockerfile. The 'builder' stage remains unchanged at version 22.3.3.
Furthermore, the PR lacks any description or linked Jira ticket, providing no context for the intended target version or the reason for the update. This discrepancy and lack of documentation should prevent the PR from being merged in its current state.
About this PR
- The PR title 'bump: Update graalvm native image' is not reflected in the diff. The 'builder' stage image remains unchanged, and the only modifications are minor whitespace removals in the 'dev' stage.
- The PR description and Jira ticket information are missing, providing no context for why the update is needed or which version was targeted.
Test suggestions
- Verify that the Dockerfile 'builder' stage uses the updated GraalVM image version specified in the PR intent
- Verify the 'dev' stage of the Dockerfile builds correctly after whitespace cleanup
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify that the Dockerfile 'builder' stage uses the updated GraalVM image version specified in the PR intent
TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback
| COPY target/universal/stage/ /workdir/ | ||
| RUN chmod +x /workdir/bin/codacy-cppcheck | ||
| USER docker | ||
| COPY docs /docs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔴 HIGH RISK
The changes in this PR do not reflect the title 'bump: Update graalvm native image'. The GraalVM version in the builder stage (line 14) remains at 22.3.3, and the only modifications are trailing whitespace removals. Try running the following prompt in your coding agent: > Update the GraalVM image version in the builder stage of the Dockerfile to the latest compatible version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we care about the version in this image? It seems to be only used for dev purposes, but it would be nice if it matched what's in sbt.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I checked and:
- On docker hub there is no
22.3.1image - On Coursier Index (the one used by Sbt when building) there is no
22.3.3JVM
I could have changed to use a default sbt image since sbt downloads the JVM to run native-image on the fly but I haven't spent much effort on it.
Sorry, I had auto-merge enabled.
| COPY target/universal/stage/ /workdir/ | ||
| RUN chmod +x /workdir/bin/codacy-cppcheck | ||
| USER docker | ||
| COPY docs /docs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we care about the version in this image? It seems to be only used for dev purposes, but it would be nice if it matched what's in sbt.
No description provided.