Daily Test Coverage Improver - Research and Plan #5
Replies: 51 comments
-
|
Successfully completed today's test coverage improvement work on SVD (Singular Value Decomposition). Pull Request Created: Draft PR with 23 comprehensive tests for SVD module Results:
Tests Added:
This is a significant improvement as the SVD module had 0% coverage before. The main computation function is now well-tested with comprehensive validation of the SVD decomposition properties.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 53 comprehensive Matrix tests. Coverage shows minimal improvement (+0.05% overall) due to F# inline function limitations - coverage tools don't track inline functions properly. However, all 53 new tests pass and validate Matrix functionality including GetSlice, transpose, arithmetic, scalar operations, and edge cases. Draft PR created with detailed analysis of coverage tool challenges.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 6 tests for
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Since F# 8.0 it should be possible to cover inline functions by using quotation evaluation to dynamically invoke them. This technique should be used with maximal care and clarity as it may be hard to debug and ends up duplicating test content. But used correctly it will increase coverage. Eg a test T1 testing the inline function "F arg1...argN" directly could be followed by a test T1Q that has the same content but the calls to F are replaced by a "eval <@ F arg1... argN @>" pattern. The LINQ quotation evaluation helper in the FSharp.Core library should be sufficient. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Implemented quotation-evaluation technique for testing inline Householder functions. Created draft PR with 20 new tests. Coverage improved from 32.09% to 33.80% overall (+1.71%), and Householder.fs went from 0% to 55.55% coverage. This demonstrates the technique suggested by maintainers for tracking inline function execution in coverage tools.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed VectorModule quotation-based testing. Coverage improved from 32.09% to 35.46% overall (+3.37%), with VectorModule going from 23.3% to 100.0% coverage. Added 50 tests using quotation evaluation technique. Draft PR created.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed Householder quotation-based testing. Coverage improved from 32.09% to 35.12% (+3.03%, +62 lines), with Householder.fs achieving 98.41% coverage from 0%. Draft PR created with 18 new tests using quotation evaluation technique.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 30 comprehensive tests for SpanPrimitives module, but encountered F# inline function coverage limitation. Result: Coverage unchanged at 32.09% due to inline functions being untraceable by coverage tools, even with quotation technique (fails for Span/byref types). However, all 30 new tests pass and thoroughly validate SpanPrimitives functionality including SIMD paths, edge cases, and mathematical correctness. Draft PR created documenting the inline function coverage challenge and recommending focus on modules with non-inline code (VectorModule, Matrix) for future coverage improvements.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new work completed today - earlier runs already created multiple draft PRs (#45, #47, #48, #49) with comprehensive test coverage improvements.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed quotation-based test coverage improvements for MatrixModule inline functions. Coverage improved from 32.09% to 32.73% overall (+0.64%, +13 lines), with MatrixModule achieving 100% coverage (up from 80%). Draft PR created with 20 new tests for Matrix.copy and Matrix.ofRowSeq using the quotation evaluation technique recommended by maintainers.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed Gamma.fs quotation-based testing work. Coverage improved dramatically from 0.52% to 97.94% for Gamma.fs, with overall project coverage increasing from 32.09% to 41.32%. Draft PR created with 76 comprehensive tests using the quotation evaluation technique recommended by maintainers. All 843 tests passing.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed GenericMath.fs quotation-based testing work. Coverage improved from 0% to 100% for GenericMath.fs, with overall project coverage increasing from 32.09% to 32.82%. Draft PR created with 70 comprehensive tests using the quotation evaluation technique recommended by maintainers. All 823 tests passing (up from 767). The quotation-based approach successfully tracked coverage for all 17 inline generic math functions (zero, one, T, sqrt, exp, pow, log, abs, sin, cos, pi, e, tau, floor, epsilon) and validates that the technique works well for inline functions without Span/byref types.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed test coverage work on Givens and GolubKahan modules, achieving 100% coverage for both. Coverage improved from 32.09% to 34.58% (+2.49%, +51 lines). Draft PR created with 16 new quotation-based tests.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed AlgTypesTopLevelOps module testing. Coverage improved from 50% to 100% for the module. Draft PR created with 19 new tests.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed quotation-based testing for Vector static methods. Coverage improved from 49.09% to 49.87% (+0.78%, +16 lines), achieving 100% coverage for Vector.fs. Draft PR created with 48 new tests.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. Three draft PRs (#67, #68, #69) remain open for review. Analyzed remaining coverage gaps and found that SVD.fs uncovered lines (405-448, 470-545) require very specific edge case matrices to trigger Case 1 and Case 2 of the SVD algorithm, which are difficult to construct and would require deep algorithmic understanding to test properly. Will resume when existing PRs are merged.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed Gamma.fs test coverage work, achieving 100% coverage (up from 97.62%). Draft PR created with 8 targeted tests for previously uncovered lines in
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. Analysis shows four draft PRs (#67, #68, #69, #70) were created earlier today and remain open for review. Current Status:
Remaining major coverage gaps:
Will resume coverage work once existing PRs are reviewed and merged.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Investigated remaining 0% coverage areas - attempted to improve LinearAlgebra.fs inline closure coverage but no measurable progress achieved. Investigation:
Actions Taken:
Result:
Recommendation:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. Analysis shows excellent coverage progress: Current Status:
Remaining Coverage Gaps:
Small inline helper functions in Conclusion:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 19 comprehensive error handling tests for LinearAlgebra module. Coverage remained at 77.84% due to F# inline function coverage limitation - tests execute and validate correctly, but coverage tools don't track inline function error paths. Draft PR created documenting this known limitation.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. PR #76 was created earlier today and remains open for review. Current Status:
Analysis of Remaining Coverage Gaps: The 453 uncovered lines (22.16%) are primarily:
Key Findings: All major remaining gaps are inline functions with Span/byref types that cannot be tracked by coverage tools, even with the quotation evaluation technique recommended by maintainers. These functions are indirectly tested through higher-level APIs but don't register as covered. Recommendation: With 77.84% coverage achieved and 7 open PRs awaiting review, focus should shift to:
The repository has reached an excellent coverage level. Further improvements would require architectural changes to make inline functions traceable, which may negatively impact performance.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 28 comprehensive Matrix tests covering edge cases and coverage gaps. Coverage remains at 77.12% due to F# inline function limitations - coverage tools cannot track inline function execution even when thoroughly tested.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed GenericMath.fs test coverage work. Coverage improved from 88.23% to 100% for GenericMath.fs, with overall project coverage increasing from 77.05% to 77.14%. Draft PR created with 20 comprehensive quotation-based tests for The quotation evaluation technique successfully tracked coverage for both inline utility functions, validating NaN detection and type conversion operations across multiple numeric types (float, float32, int, int64).
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully completed SVD.fs edge case testing work. Coverage improved dramatically from 85.88% to 98.82% (+12.94%, +66 lines), with overall project coverage increasing from 77.05% to 78.64%. Draft PR created with 18 comprehensive edge case tests targeting previously uncovered branches including Case 2 handling, zero diagonal paths, and negative shift calculations.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 15 comprehensive tests for Matrix Range-based GetSlice syntax (
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. PR #82 was created earlier today for Matrix Range GetSlice tests. Coverage analysis shows remaining gaps (78.74% overall) are primarily SIMD code paths in Matrix.fs and inline functions with Span/byref types (SpanPrimitives, SpanMath, SIMDUtils) that cannot be tracked by coverage tools even with quotation evaluation.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Added 21 comprehensive SIMD tests for Matrix.multiplyRowVector. Draft PR created. Coverage unchanged (78.74%) due to inline function limitation, but tests thoroughly validate SIMD paths and mathematical correctness.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Successfully added 23 comprehensive SIMD tests for Matrix vector operations (muliplyVector, addRowVector, addColVector). Draft PR created targeting SIMD paths in lines 496, 534, and 572. All 1509 tests passing.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No new test coverage work completed today. All recent PRs (#82, #84, #85) have been merged successfully, and no open PRs from Daily Test Coverage Improver currently exist. Current Status:
Analysis of Remaining Coverage Gaps: The 440 uncovered lines (21.26%) fall into these categories:
Conclusion: The repository has excellent test coverage at 78.74%. The remaining 21% of uncovered lines are predominantly:
Further coverage improvements would require either:
The project is in excellent shape from a testing perspective.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Repository Summary
FsMath is a lightweight numerical mathematics library for F# that focuses on:
Technology Stack
build/directoryCurrent Test Coverage State
Existing Test Files
The project has organized tests in
/tests/FsMath.Tests/:VectorFloatTests.fs- Tests for float vector operationsVectorIntTests.fs- Tests for integer vector operationsVectorManipulationTests.fs- Tests for vector manipulation functionsMatrixFloatTests.fs- Tests for float matrix operationsLinearAlgebra.fs- Comprehensive tests for linear algebra operations (QR decomposition, Cholesky, least squares, etc.)SpecialFunctions.fs- Tests for special mathematical functionsAssertHelpers.fs- Test utility functionsExpectoStyle.fs- Test utility for assertion styleSource Files Needing Coverage
Based on the project file, these source modules exist:
Core Types & Operations:
Vector.fs- Core vector typeMatrix.fs- Core matrix typeVectorModule.fs- Vector module functionsVectorOps.fs- Vector operationsMatrixModule.fs- Matrix module functionsAlgTypesTopLevelOps.fs- Top-level algebraic operationsLow-Level Performance:
GenericMath.fs- Generic math operationsSpanPrimitives.fs- Span-based primitive operationsSpanMath.fs- Span-based math operationsSIMDUtils.fs- SIMD utilitiesPermutation.fs- Permutation operationsAlgebra Modules:
Algebra/Householder.fs- Householder transformationsAlgebra/EVD.fs- Eigenvalue decompositionAlgebra/LinearAlgebra.fs- Linear algebra operations (well-tested)Algebra/SVD.fs- Singular value decompositionAlgebra/MatrixExt.fs- Matrix extensionsSpecial Functions:
SpecialFunctions/Gamma.fs- Gamma function (has some tests)Commands to Build and Test
Build the project
Run tests
Generate coverage report
The coverlet.collector package is already configured, so coverage can be collected using standard
dotnet testcommands.Test Organization
Tests are organized by:
[<Fact>]attributesNew tests should follow this structure:
AssertHelpers.fsImprovement Plan
Priority Areas (Low to High Coverage Expected)
Algebra/SVD.fs) - No dedicated test file foundAlgebra/EVD.fs) - No dedicated test file foundAlgebra/Householder.fs) - Limited coverageAlgebra/MatrixExt.fs) - Limited coveragePermutation.fs) - No dedicated test file foundSIMDUtils.fsSpanMath.fsSpanPrimitives.fsStrategy
Opportunities for Greatly Increasing Coverage
Questions for Maintainers
Next Steps
Once this plan is approved:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions