Pull Request Dashboard

[github-actions]

Note

Open PRs are grouped by deterministic routing over per-thread LLM classifications. CI, conflicts, and activity age are computed deterministically and are shown as facts, not used as standalone routing reasons.

Waiting on maintainer (approved)

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Deprecate opentracing shim public API	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	❌	✅	2d
Update dependency org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-gradle-plugin to v2.3.21	app/renovate	❌	✅	59d

Waiting on approvers

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Update spotless packages to v8.5.0	app/renovate	❌	✅	?
Fix Groovy OpenTelemetrySdk builder loading	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	❌	✅	0d
Group renovate minor version updates in weekly	jack-berg	✅	✅	0d
Remove deprecated ExtendedAttributes and related code	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Remove view file config mechanism	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
profiles: improve JFR export example	jhalliday	✅	✅	14d
Update prometheusServerVersion to v1.6.1	app/renovate	❌	✅	?
Move otlp utilities to otlp package	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Move delta record/collect coordination from instrument to series level	jack-berg	✅	✅	2d
Protect against index out of bounds exception	jack-berg	❌	✅	21d
Make snakeyaml-engine and jackson-databind optional at runtime	zeitlinger	✅	❌	23d
Use setup-gradle w/ cache-provider: basic to use more permissive MIT …	jack-berg	✅	❌	38d
Add JSON pretty-print to logging-otlp exporters	lucacavenaghi97	✅	✅	63d
Add a ConfigProvider callback for runtime instrumentation option changes	jackshirazi	❌	❌	8d
Make StandardComponentId constructor public	brunobat	✅	❌	197d

Waiting on authors

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Commit declarative config schema pojos to git	jack-berg	❌	✅	0d
OSGi support and tests for OTLP exporters	jack-berg	✅	✅	0d
Merge colliding Prometheus label values	ADITYA-CODE-SOURCE	✅	✅	0d
Limit exemplar label characters to conform to Prometheus limits	anuq	✅	✅	5d
Update dependency java to v26	trask	✅	✅	36d
Replace ArrayBlockingQueue with park/unpark for BatchSpanProcessor$Worker	Khepu	✅	✅	22d
[DO NOT MERGE] JFR API usage	jhalliday	❌	✅	42d
Limit prometheus exemplar labels	harshitrjpt	✅	❌	5d

Waiting on external

PR	Author	CI	Conflicts	Activity
Update junit-framework monorepo	app/renovate	❌	❌	7d
Update dependency java to v26	app/renovate	❌	✅	23d
Add fallback endpoint support for OTLP exporters	sridharsurvi1	❌	❌	29d

Diagnostics

PR #8409
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=None
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8408
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=3 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKKVv -> reviewer (The author is clarifying where the meaningful change is and effectively handing the thread back for review; no new implementation request is pending from the author.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKMLE -> none (The author’s comment just explains an existing Error Prone suppression as intentional, with no request for a change or further reply.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKN7v -> author (The last comment is from the PR author and indicates they are investigating whether to change the constructor approach, so the next step is on the author to follow up or implement.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKPJM -> author (The latest author comment says they should investigate renaming the methods to `set*`, so the next step is on the author to act.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CKPwd -> author (The latest comment is from the PR author and says they should investigate changing the `toString` output and formatting, so the next step is on the author to implement or adjust it.)
route: author

PR #8407
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CMfQS -> reviewer (The reviewer requested justification comments, and the author says they added them; the thread is now back in reviewer court for re-review.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86CMnfF -> none (The author answered the question about using `Object`, and the thread is now informational with no explicit follow-up requested.)
route: approver

PR #8406
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8401
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The latest comment is a concrete remaining issue report from an outsider: `sdk-extension-autoconfigure` still has mandatory imports that pull in extra bundles. That calls for the PR author to investigate and fix the manifest/dependency handling.)
route: author

PR #8395
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8394
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8377
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=7
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86Ab-gj -> external (The approver says to wait for the real 7.3.0 release before merging, so the thread is blocked on an upstream Bndtools release outside this repository.)
route: external

PR #8373
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> none (The author already answered the CI concern and said any follow-up would be in a separate issue, so this thread itself needs no further action.)
route: maintainer

PR #8364
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=0
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86BhQsA -> author (The approver requested a code comment and then a design change to avoid unnecessary allocation by switching to a lazy collision-only path, so the PR author needs to update the test/code.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86BhVsZ -> author (The approver is requesting a code change to include normalization collisions from resource/scope/additionalAttributes, so the PR author needs to update the implementation.)
llm: pr-conversation -> external (The author says the PR is parked pending #8346, so the next step is blocked on that outside dependency before they can rebase and apply the requested changes.)
route: author

PR #8362
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=5
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86A2FZf -> author (A commenter flagged a likely code change needed (`codePointCount` instead of `length`) in the converter, so the PR author needs to update or respond.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86A2G81 -> author (A reviewer requested the tests be converted to parameterized tests, so the PR author needs to decide and implement or जवाब.)
route: author

PR #8349
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=14
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author is asking the profiling maintainers for input on spec changes and the wire-spec conflict, so the next move is for reviewers/maintainers to respond.)
route: approver

PR #8335
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=None
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8326
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author is explicitly requesting review from @open-telemetry/java-approvers, so the next action is on reviewers/maintainers.)
route: approver

PR #8313
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=2
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g858njQs -> none (The only comment is the author explaining the design choice; it does not ask for input or request a change, so no follow-up is needed.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g86AVPvC -> reviewer (The author explains they changed the test strategy to avoid sub-millisecond sleeps, so the implementation side appears addressed and the thread is now waiting on reviewer review/approval.)
route: approver

PR #8294
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=21
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: approver

PR #8270
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=23
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g857PtCt -> none (The reviewer suggested deferring this design change, and the author agreed to keep it as a follow-up; no further action is requested in the thread.)
route: approver

PR #8261
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=36
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g855XQ2Y -> none (The author asked an optional compatibility question and the approver replied that it was fine, so no follow-up action is required in this thread.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g855rwM4 -> author (An approver asked “What’s this?” and the thread has no follow-up answer, so the author needs to explain or adjust the change.)
route: author

PR #8256
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=38
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The reviewer asked for the benefit, and the author answered with evidence that the TOU differ by cache provider, so the thread is now back in the reviewer’s court.)
route: approver

PR #8240
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=22
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (The author said they would investigate why the benchmark metrics are zero, so the next step is on the PR author.)
route: author

PR #8232
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=23
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> external (The reviewer says the PR is blocked by missing upstream GraalVM support for Java 26, so progress depends on an external artifact being available rather than a repo-local change.)
route: external

PR #8197
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=29
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=1 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> external (The author pointed to the upstream spec discussion, and the PR comment says to wait on that spec-first process; the thread is now blocked outside this repository.)
route: external

PR #8164
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=63
threads: author=0 reviewer=2 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85z-n0C -> reviewer (The latest comment is from a reviewer requesting input from other approvers on the proposed config naming guardrail, so the thread is waiting on reviewer/maintainer feedback rather than author action.)
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The author is explicitly waiting for approver feedback before making any more changes, so the next action is with a reviewer/approver.)
route: approver

PR #8076
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=8
threads: author=0 reviewer=2 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85-kTBF -> reviewer (The reviewer raised an optimization suggestion, and the author replied "added," indicating they addressed it; the thread is now back with the reviewer to confirm or continue review.)
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The latest comment is the author asking how an extension can call setConfig and requesting guidance on the API shape, so the ball is back with the reviewer/maintainer.)
route: approver

PR #7924
facts: approved=True conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=59
threads: author=0 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
route: maintainer

PR #7763
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=197
threads: author=0 reviewer=1 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> reviewer (The reviewer asked for clarification, and the author answered; the thread is now back in the reviewer’s court to respond or decide whether the explanation is sufficient.)
route: approver

PR #7741
facts: approved=False conflicts=no days_since_last_activity=42
threads: author=1 reviewer=0 external=0 none=0 unclear=0
llm: pr-conversation -> author (Reviewer explained the build issue and possible fixes; the latest comment is only an informational external suggestion, so the next step is for the PR author to act on one of the proposed changes.)
route: author

PR #6791
facts: approved=False conflicts=yes days_since_last_activity=5
threads: author=2 reviewer=0 external=0 none=1 unclear=0
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85aSnGV -> author (A reviewer asked whether the change is based on a specification, so the author needs to जवाब/respond with the source or clarify the basis.)
llm: PRRT_kwDOCkv3g85aSnh9 -> author (The approver asked the PR author to add a test covering the change, so the next step is for the author to implement it.)
llm: pr-conversation -> none (The comment only points to another related PR and does not ask for a response or change in this thread.)
route: author

Generated 2026-05-15 12:46 UTC