fix(content): correct stale/mislabeled competitor facts surfaced in FAQ audit

- n8n's license is "fair-code" (n8n's own coined term), not "fair-use" —
  a different legal concept entirely; fixed 4 occurrences
- Activepieces' integration count is 750+ per their live catalog, not the
  280+ figure carried over from an older snapshot; fixed 4 occurrences
  across best-zapier-alternatives and n8n-alternatives

Author: waleedlatif1

apps/sim/content/library/best-zapier-alternatives/index.mdx

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Whether you're hitting the complexity ceiling, need self-hosting for compliance,
 
 - **Workato:** Enterprise-grade integration with strong governance, audit logging, and support SLAs. Priced accordingly, starting around $1,000/month.
 
-- **Activepieces:** Open-source with an MIT license and a cleaner, more approachable UI than n8n. Growing integration library (280+) with a free self-hosted tier.
+- **Activepieces:** Open-source with an MIT license and a cleaner, more approachable UI than n8n. Growing integration library (750+) with a free self-hosted tier.
 
 - **Microsoft Power Automate:** Deep native integration with Microsoft 365, Azure, and Dynamics 365, often already included in your existing license. Best for organizations standardized on the Microsoft stack.
 
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Activepieces occupies a useful niche: open-source automation that doesn't requir
 
 The interface is cleaner and more approachable than n8n's, which makes Activepieces the better open-source pick for teams that want the benefits of open source (data control, no vendor lock-in, community-driven development) without the technical overhead of managing a self-hosted n8n instance.
 
-The integration library is growing but still smaller than the established players, with roughly 280+ pieces as of 2026. That's a trade-off worth acknowledging upfront: if your workflow depends on a niche app, check compatibility before committing. For common SaaS tools (Slack, Google Workspace, Notion, GitHub, CRMs), coverage is solid and expanding steadily.
+The integration library is growing but still smaller than the established players, with roughly 750+ pieces as of 2026. That's a trade-off worth acknowledging upfront: if your workflow depends on a niche app, check compatibility before committing. For common SaaS tools (Slack, Google Workspace, Notion, GitHub, CRMs), coverage is solid and expanding steadily.
 
 **Best for:** Teams that want open-source flexibility with a friendlier interface than n8n, especially non-technical users who value data control but don't want to manage complex server infrastructure.
 

apps/sim/content/library/n8n-alternatives/index.mdx

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ faq:
   - q: "Is Make better than n8n?"
     a: "Neither is universally better. Make wins on debugging experience, accessibility for non-developers, and managed infrastructure that eliminates self-hosting overhead. n8n wins on extensibility, developer control, self-hosting flexibility, and community ecosystem depth. If your team is primarily non-technical and values visual debugging, Make is the better fit. If your team is developer-heavy and values code-level customization, n8n still has the edge."
   - q: "What is the best open-source n8n alternative?"
-    a: "Activepieces offers the cleanest MIT license with a growing integration library of 280+ pieces and active community contribution. Sim provides open-source AI agent workflows with Docker and Kubernetes deployment for teams that need agentic capabilities. Node-RED remains the standard for IoT and hardware automation contexts where n8n's web-focused architecture is overkill. Match the tool to your use case rather than defaulting to the one with the most GitHub stars."
+    a: "Activepieces offers the cleanest MIT license with a growing integration library of 750+ pieces and active community contribution. Sim provides open-source AI agent workflows with Docker and Kubernetes deployment for teams that need agentic capabilities. Node-RED remains the standard for IoT and hardware automation contexts where n8n's web-focused architecture is overkill. Match the tool to your use case rather than defaulting to the one with the most GitHub stars."
   - q: "How hard is it to migrate from n8n to another tool?"
     a: "It depends on which tool you are migrating to. Moving to a platform with a similar trigger-action paradigm (like Activepieces) is the closest format match and typically takes a few weeks of focused engineering for a mid-size portfolio. Before committing, calculate the full cost of migration, including potential productivity dips during transition. For most teams, the investment pays off within two to three quarters if the new platform eliminates major pain points and bottlenecks."
 ---
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Activepieces is the cleanest open-source alternative to n8n if licensing terms m
 **Strengths:**
 
 - **MIT license with no strings attached:** The codebase lives on GitHub under the MIT license, the most permissive of open-source licenses, giving organizations complete freedom to self-host, modify, fork, and extend the platform without any licensing fees or usage restrictions.
-- **Growing integration and MCP ecosystem:** All 280+ pieces are available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs on Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf. The community contributes actively, with 60% of the pieces contributed by the community.
+- **Growing integration and MCP ecosystem:** All 750+ pieces are available as MCP servers that you can use with LLMs on Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf. The community contributes actively, with 60% of the pieces contributed by the community.
 - **Clean, accessible UI:** Activepieces has the most polished UI of any open-source automation platform, making it accessible to non-technical users while still supporting code steps for custom logic.
 - **Flat-rate cloud pricing:** Cloud pricing starts free with 10 free active flows, then $5 per active flow per month with unlimited runs. No per-execution billing surprises.
 

apps/sim/content/library/openai-vs-n8n-vs-sim/index.mdx

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ faq:
   - q: "Can OpenAI AgentKit run models from providers other than OpenAI?"
     a: "No. AgentKit only runs OpenAI models, while Sim connects to multiple AI providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Groq, Cerebras, and local Ollama models."
   - q: "Is n8n fully open source?"
-    a: "No. n8n is fair-use licensed with some restrictions, not fully open source. Sim, by contrast, is Apache 2.0 licensed and fully open source."
+    a: "No. n8n is fair-code licensed with some restrictions, not fully open source. Sim, by contrast, is Apache 2.0 licensed and fully open source."
   - q: "Does OpenAI AgentKit provide execution logs for debugging agents in production?"
     a: "No, AgentKit has no execution logs or detailed monitoring for debugging and observability. Sim provides enterprise-grade logging with execution IDs, block-level timing, token/cost tracking, and error traces."
   - q: "Can n8n workflows be built programmatically instead of through the visual builder?"
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ n8n is best suited for:
 While n8n is excellent for traditional automation, it has some limitations for AI agent development:
 
 - No SDK to build workflows programmatically—limited to visual builder only
-- Not fully open source but fair-use licensed, with some restrictions
+- Not fully open source but fair-code licensed, with some restrictions
 - Free trial limited to 14 days, after which paid plans are required
 - Limited/complex parallel execution handling
 
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ While all three platforms enable AI agent development, they excel in different a
 
 **Best for:** Traditional workflow automation with some AI enhancement. Excellent when your primary need is connecting business tools and services, with AI as a complementary feature rather than the core focus.
 
-**Limitations:** No SDK for programmatic workflow building, fair-use licensing (not fully open source), 14-day trial limitation, and AI agent capabilities are newer and less mature compared to its traditional automation features.
+**Limitations:** No SDK for programmatic workflow building, fair-code licensing (not fully open source), 14-day trial limitation, and AI agent capabilities are newer and less mature compared to its traditional automation features.
 
 ### Sim