Update datacenter_overview.json

[kylerkang]

What does this PR do?

Making a few dashboard changes to the "Network Device Monitoring" OOTB Dashboard found in the dashboards dropdown. I had originally updated all the updated NDM OOTB dashboards, but for this specific one, the "Network Overview" is missing widgets since I made it a powerpack. I am adding those widgets back in this PR.

Found here:

Before:

After:

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[dd-octo-sts]

⚠️ Recommendation: Add qa/skip-qa label

This PR does not modify any files shipped with the agent.

To help streamline the release process, please consider adding the qa/skip-qa label if these changes do not require QA testing.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: acef9525bc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Remove hard-coded monitor creator filter

The new monitor summary query is constrained to createdby:billcain, which means the “Alerts sorted by severity” widget will only show monitors created by that specific user; in any other Datadog org (or even this org after ownership changes), the widget will appear empty and hide active alerts. This is a functional regression for the dashboard’s default experience and should be replaced with a reusable scope filter (or no creator filter).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[victorsprengel]

Is datadog_demo_keep:true intentional here?

[kylerkang]

Is datadog_demo_keep:true intentional here?

@victorsprengel no it is not, let me change that

Review from victorsprengel is dismissed. Related teams and files:

• network-device-monitoring-core
  • snmp/assets/dashboards/datacenter_overview.json

[dd-octo-sts]

Validation Report

All 20 validations passed.

Show details

Validation	Description	Status
agent-reqs	Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file	✅
ci	Validate CI configuration and Codecov settings	✅
codeowners	Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry	✅
config	Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml	✅
dep	Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible	✅
http	Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly	✅
imports	Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules	✅
integration-style	Validate check code style conventions	✅
jmx-metrics	Validate JMX metrics definition files and config	✅
labeler	Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories	✅
legacy-signature	Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature	✅
license-headers	Validate Python files have proper license headers	✅
licenses	Validate third-party license attribution list	✅
metadata	Validate metadata.csv metric definitions	✅
models	Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml	✅
openmetrics	Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit	✅
package	Validate Python package metadata and naming	✅
readmes	Validate README files have required sections	✅
saved-views	Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields	✅
version	Validate version consistency between package and changelog	✅

View full run