Skip to content

Refine language parser support with unit testing. #26

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
webbju merged 10 commits into from
Dec 16, 2025
Merged

Refine language parser support with unit testing. #26

webbju merged 10 commits into from
Dec 16, 2025

Conversation

@webbju
Copy link
Member

@webbju webbju commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Checklist

  • I have read the Contributor Guide
  • I have read and agree to the Code of Conduct
  • I have added a description of my changes and why I'd like them included in the section below

Description of Changes

  • Extend unit-testing for validation of UnrealAngelscriptParser over code snippets.
    • Expose ServerCodeExciser internals to test project.
  • Support nested (fully qualified) namespace.
  • Support "named arguments".
  • Support "heredoc" string literals.
  • Support allow_discard keyword.

@webbju webbju changed the title Webbju/refine unit tests Refine language parser support with unit testing. Dec 16, 2025
@webbju webbju force-pushed the webbju/refine-unit-tests branch from ec8d9ad to 34b9762 Compare December 16, 2025 12:36
@webbju webbju marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2025 12:51
@webbju webbju requested a review from tvandijck as a code owner December 16, 2025 12:52
phoglund
phoglund approved these changes Dec 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@phoglund phoglund left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@webbju webbju merged commit d4f0806 into main Dec 16, 2025
1 check passed
@webbju webbju deleted the webbju/refine-unit-tests branch December 16, 2025 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@phoglund phoglund phoglund approved these changes

@tvandijck tvandijck Awaiting requested review from tvandijck tvandijck is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@webbju @phoglund