Add a registration function for table allocation in master-slave mode.

[wardlican]

Why are the changes needed?

The HighAvailabilityContainer adds a node registration function. In master-slave mode, each AMS node, after startup, needs to elect a master through ZooKeeper or DB and register its own node information in ZooKeeper or DB. Registration is done using ephemeral nodes. If a node fails, its registration information needs to be automatically deleted. The system also provides the master node with the ability to view the list of currently active nodes.

Close #3919 .

Brief change log

Core functionalities implemented:

1. Node registration:

• In master-slave mode, AMS nodes register their information with ZooKeeper (ZK) upon startup.
• Ephemeral sequential nodes (EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL) are used, automatically cleaned up when a node exits abnormally.

2. Node deregistration:

• Nodes actively deregister from their ZK registration information when shutting down.

3. Live node query:

• The master node can query a list of all currently live nodes. In non-master or non-master-slave modes, an empty list is returned.

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 35.18519% with 70 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 29.02%. Comparing base (e02295b) to head (41eaf21).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...o/server/ha/DataBaseHighAvailabilityContainer.java	0.00%	44 Missing ⚠️
...e/amoro/server/ha/ZkHighAvailabilityContainer.java	64.40%	17 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...amoro/server/ha/NoopHighAvailabilityContainer.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...org/apache/amoro/server/AmoroServiceContainer.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...a/org/apache/amoro/properties/AmsHAProperties.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3920      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     22.44%   29.02%   +6.58%     
- Complexity     2552     3999    +1447     
============================================
  Files           458      657     +199     
  Lines         42022    52438   +10416     
  Branches       5915     6670     +755     
============================================
+ Hits           9433    15222    +5789     
- Misses        31777    36102    +4325     
- Partials        812     1114     +302     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	29.02% <35.18%> (?)
trino	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@amoro.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

[wardlican]

Please check the changes here.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@amoro.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

[wardlican]

@zhoujinsong Please help with the CR .

[czy006]

Thank you for your contribution. I left a comment.

[czy006]

cc @xxubai

[xxubai]

The two implementations register different service info. Given that AmoroServiceContainer.main() calls registerAndElect() followed by startOptimizingService() in master-slave mode, the ZK implementation should also register optimizingServiceServerInfo (or both) to be consistent.

[xxubai]

nit: lack return param