Skip to content

[ISSUE #9959] Correct thread name prefix for file recycling executor in tiered store#9960

Open
majialoong wants to merge 6 commits intoapache:developfrom
majialoong:ISSUE-9959
Open

[ISSUE #9959] Correct thread name prefix for file recycling executor in tiered store#9960
majialoong wants to merge 6 commits intoapache:developfrom
majialoong:ISSUE-9959

Conversation

@majialoong
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #9959

Brief Description

Thread use the correct name prefix.

How Did You Test This Change?

Unit test

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.84%. Comparing base (ebf1595) to head (f156230).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #9960      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      48.94%   48.84%   -0.11%     
+ Complexity     13389    13360      -29     
=============================================
  Files           1373     1373              
  Lines          99924    99924              
  Branches       12908    12908              
=============================================
- Hits           48904    48803     -101     
- Misses         45097    45180      +83     
- Partials        5923     5941      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

yuz10
yuz10 previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2026
@lizhimins
Copy link
Member

Good catch. Can you merge the unit tests into one?


@Test
public void testFileRecyclingExecutorThreadNamePrefix() throws Exception {
assertThreadNamePrefix(executor.fileRecyclingExecutor, "FileRecyclingExecutor_",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you merge the unit tests into one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the suggestion. Done.

@majialoong majialoong requested a review from lizhimins January 14, 2026 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Correct thread name prefix for file recycling executor in tiered store

4 participants