refactor(resource): deduplicate HealthCheckResource across services

[Ma77Ball]

What changes were proposed in this PR?

• Added a single shared HealthCheckResource in the common/auth module under the existing package org.apache.texera.service.resource, which all six backend services already depend on.
• Deleted the six byte-for-byte identical copies from access-control, config, file, computing-unit-managing, workflow-compiling, and notebook-migration services (~160 lines removed).
• Kept the same fully-qualified class name, so every existing import, register(classOf[HealthCheckResource]) call, and test spec works unchanged with zero call-site edits.
• amber's org.apache.texera.web.resource.HealthCheckResource is intentionally left out of scope: it uses the older javax.ws.rs namespace and lacks @PermitAll, so it is not safely mergeable.

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

Closes: #5976

How was this PR tested?

• Pure consolidation with no behavior change, so no new test was added; the existing service *RunSpec suites already assert classOf[HealthCheckResource] registration and continue to pass against the shared class.
• Compiled all affected modules: sbt "Auth/compile" "ConfigService/compile" "AccessControlService/compile" "FileService/compile" "ComputingUnitManagingService/compile" "WorkflowCompilingService/compile" "NotebookMigrationService/compile", expect all to succeed (they did locally).
• Optional manual check: start any service and curl localhost:<port>/api/healthcheck, expect {"status":"ok"}.

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Co-authored with Claude Opus 4.8 in compliance with ASF

[github-actions]

Automated Reviewer Suggestions

Based on the git blame history of the changed files, we recommend the following reviewers:

• Contributors with relevant context: @Yicong-Huang, @zyratlo
  You can notify them by mentioning @Yicong-Huang, @zyratlo in a comment.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.47%. Comparing base (0e0ec11) to head (52436e2).
⚠️ Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #5979      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     56.23%   56.47%   +0.24%     
- Complexity     2987     2999      +12     
============================================
  Files          1120     1126       +6     
  Lines         43167    43699     +532     
  Branches       4658     4734      +76     
============================================
+ Hits          24274    24679     +405     
- Misses        17472    17563      +91     
- Partials       1421     1457      +36     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
access-control-service	70.00% <ø> (ø)
agent-service	44.59% <ø> (ø)
amber	57.73% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 22bb64c
computing-unit-managing-service	0.00% <ø> (ø)
config-service	52.30% <ø> (+0.74%)	⬆️
file-service	62.81% <ø> (+3.79%)	⬆️
frontend	49.97% <ø> (+0.69%)	⬆️
notebook-migration-service	78.57% <ø> (ø)
pyamber	90.20% <ø> (ø)
python	90.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 22bb64c
workflow-compiling-service	55.14% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Yicong-Huang]

ah @Ma77Ball I think health check does not belong to auth module. I understand you want to have a common place for that, but not in auth..

[Yicong-Huang]

if needed, you can add common/resource project to contain this part of code.

[github-actions]

⚠️ Benchmark changes need a look

🟢 2 better · 🔴 5 worse · ⚪ 8 noise (<±5%) · 0 without baseline

Compared against main 0e0ec11 benchmarked on this same runner, so the delta is largely free of cross-runner hardware noise. The "7d avg" column still reflects the gh-pages dashboard. Treat <±5% as noise unless repeated.

Dashboard · Run

	config	throughput	MB/s	latency	max Δ latest / 7d
🔴	bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	376	0.23	26,325/32,018/32,018 us	🔴 +12.5% / 🔴 +112.5%
🔴	bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	785	0.479	125,203/146,663/146,663 us	🔴 +7.2% / 🔴 +34.7%
⚪	bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	907	0.554	1,102,489/1,139,262/1,139,262 us	⚪ within ±5% / 🔴 +10.0%

Baseline details

Latest main 0e0ec11 from same runner

config	metric	PR	latest main	7d avg	Δ latest	Δ 7d
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	376 tuples/sec	402 tuples/sec	770.82 tuples/sec	-6.5%	-51.2%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.23 MB/s	0.246 MB/s	0.47 MB/s	-6.5%	-51.1%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p50	26,325 us	23,400 us	12,723 us	+12.5%	+106.9%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p95	32,018 us	34,083 us	15,070 us	-6.1%	+112.5%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64	p99	32,018 us	34,083 us	18,429 us	-6.1%	+73.7%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	785 tuples/sec	822 tuples/sec	973.75 tuples/sec	-4.5%	-19.4%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.479 MB/s	0.502 MB/s	0.594 MB/s	-4.6%	-19.4%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p50	125,203 us	121,481 us	102,519 us	+3.1%	+22.1%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p95	146,663 us	136,833 us	108,855 us	+7.2%	+34.7%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64	p99	146,663 us	136,833 us	117,788 us	+7.2%	+24.5%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	throughput	907 tuples/sec	920 tuples/sec	1,004 tuples/sec	-1.4%	-9.7%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	MB/s	0.554 MB/s	0.562 MB/s	0.613 MB/s	-1.4%	-9.6%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p50	1,102,489 us	1,092,596 us	1,001,930 us	+0.9%	+10.0%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p95	1,139,262 us	1,123,368 us	1,042,923 us	+1.4%	+9.2%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64	p99	1,139,262 us	1,123,368 us	1,074,893 us	+1.4%	+6.0%

Raw CSV

config_idx,batch_size,schema_width,string_len,num_batches,total_ms,total_tuples,total_bytes,tuples_per_sec,mb_per_sec,lat_p50_us,lat_p95_us,lat_p99_us
0,10,10,64,20,531.83,200,128000,376,0.230,26325.30,32017.55,32017.55
1,100,10,64,20,2549.15,2000,1280000,785,0.479,125202.76,146663.09,146663.09
2,1000,10,64,20,22039.34,20000,12800000,907,0.554,1102489.17,1139262.21,1139262.21

[Ma77Ball]

Moved HealthCheckResource into a new common/resource module.

[Ma77Ball]

/request-review @Yicong-Huang

[Yicong-Huang]

this has nothing to do with ASF right? refactor(asf) let's change the title