Skip to content

Conversation

@snbianco
Copy link
Contributor

@snbianco snbianco commented Jan 2, 2026

Our documentation was in need of a refresh, so I spent some time updating the pages while things were slow for these past few weeks.

mast_catalog.rst had minimal changes since we're going to be doing a major rewrite soon that will include documentation updates. I also didn't spend too much time on mast_missions.rst since that was written more recently.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.73%. Comparing base (8d9cf1a) to head (27a673d).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3487   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.73%   71.73%           
=======================================
  Files         235      235           
  Lines       20258    20258           
=======================================
  Hits        14533    14533           
  Misses       5725     5725           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@snbianco snbianco requested a review from bsipocz January 2, 2026 23:31
@snbianco snbianco marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2026 23:31
@snbianco snbianco added the mast label Jan 2, 2026
@bsipocz bsipocz added this to the 0.4.12 milestone Jan 6, 2026
Copy link
Member

@bsipocz bsipocz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Overall it looks good, I only wonder if a few more examples could be unignored?

...
>>> coord = SkyCoord(189.49206, 62.20615, unit="deg")
>>> survey_list = Zcut.get_surveys(coordinates=coord)
>>> print(survey_list) # doctest: +IGNORE_OUTPUT
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why the ignore here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@snbianco snbianco Jan 7, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's possible that we add new surveys or change the footprints of current ones, so this output would change. In fact, I ran the code again and got 4 surveys back, so I'll update that.

>>> hdulist = Tesscut.get_cutouts(objectname="TIC 32449963", sector=37)
>>> cutout_coord = SkyCoord(107.18696, -70.50919, unit="deg")
>>> hdulist = Tesscut.get_cutouts(coordinates=cutout_coord, sector=33)
>>> hdulist[0].info() # doctest: +IGNORE_OUTPUT
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why the ignore, do we expect this to change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this shouldn't change. I'll remove!

2 APERTURE 1 ImageHDU 82 (5, 5) int32
>>> coord = SkyCoord(135.1408, -5.1915, unit="deg")
>>> sector_table = Tesscut.get_sectors(coordinates=coord)
>>> print(sector_table) # doctest: +IGNORE_OUTPUT
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this expected to change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since TESS is still producing data, it is possible for the list of sectors to grow.

@bsipocz bsipocz merged commit c4056a8 into astropy:main Jan 7, 2026
12 checks passed
@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Jan 7, 2026

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants