Skip to content

Conversation

@dagguh
Copy link
Contributor

@dagguh dagguh commented Aug 23, 2019

No description provided.

@dagguh dagguh force-pushed the issue/JPERF-379-assume-less-for-logins branch 6 times, most recently from 5cc8ea7 to 95be0f8 Compare August 30, 2019 12:57
@dagguh dagguh force-pushed the issue/JPERF-379-assume-less-for-logins branch 2 times, most recently from 59f82a2 to faa8014 Compare September 6, 2019 14:39
@dagguh dagguh force-pushed the issue/JPERF-379-assume-less-for-logins branch from faa8014 to 50c9c5a Compare September 19, 2019 07:58
@dagguh dagguh force-pushed the issue/JPERF-379-assume-less-for-logins branch from 017f5a1 to a1e4c6c Compare February 12, 2020 17:13
@dagguh
Copy link
Contributor Author

dagguh commented Sep 11, 2023

This PR is ancient. It was blocked by poor/missing CI coverage. Testing has been improved on master in the meantime.
This PR is now obsoleted by #147

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant