Skip to content

build(deps): bump langsmith to 0.8.0 across uv lockfiles#434

Merged
Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-langsmith-0.8.0
May 14, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump langsmith to 0.8.0 across uv lockfiles#434
Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
bump-langsmith-0.8.0

Conversation

@starfolkai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@starfolkai starfolkai Bot commented May 14, 2026

Summary

Scope note

py/uv.lock had drifted against pyproject.toml's open ranges before this PR, so the relock also picked up unrelated cascades: pydantic-ai 1.66 -> 1.94 (+ -slim/-evals/-graph), litellm adding 1.84.0, pydantic-handlebars 0.1.0 added, and small cleanups to langchain-openai, nexus-rpc, temporalio. These were unavoidable side effects of uv lock reconciling the stale file — happy to drop the relock and keep just the langsmith bump if preferred.

Test plan

  • CI green on the static_checks job (pylint resolves with the new langsmith pin)
  • Sharded nox matrix green, particularly test_langchain and any session that exercises langsmith transitively
  • Spot-check nox -s "test_langchain(latest)" locally

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Bumps the langsmith pin in py/pyproject.toml's lint group from 0.7.31
to 0.8.0 and regenerates py/uv.lock and integrations/adk-py/uv.lock so
no resolution can pick up a sub-0.8.0 langsmith.

integrations/langchain-py/uv.lock was already at 0.8.0 (#433).

py/uv.lock relock also picked up unrelated drift the existing lockfile
had against pyproject.toml's open ranges (pydantic-ai 1.66 -> 1.94 and
friends, litellm 1.84.0 added, pydantic-handlebars 0.1.0 added, etc.).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) enabled auto-merge (squash) May 14, 2026 15:59
@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) merged commit dc44e5a into main May 14, 2026
161 of 163 checks passed
@AbhiPrasad Abhijeet Prasad (AbhiPrasad) deleted the bump-langsmith-0.8.0 branch May 14, 2026 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants