Skip to content

Deprecate old go stacks#642

Merged
michael-valdron merged 2 commits intodevfile:mainfrom
thepetk:feat/deprecate_go_stacks
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

Deprecate old go stacks#642
michael-valdron merged 2 commits intodevfile:mainfrom
thepetk:feat/deprecate_go_stacks

Conversation

@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor

@thepetk thepetk commented Sep 11, 2025

Description of Changes

Adds a deprecated label to the old golang stacks (go version older than v1.23 and also skips them from renovate updates.

Related Issue(s)

N/A

Acceptance Criteria

  • Contributing guide

Have you read the devfile registry contributing guide and followed its instructions?

  • Test automation

Does this repository's tests pass with your changes?

  • Documentation

Does any documentation need to be updated with your changes?

  • Check Tools Provider

Have you tested the changes with existing tools, i.e. Odo, Che, Console? (See devfile registry contributing guide on how to test changes)

Tests Performed

Explain what tests you personally ran to ensure the changes are functioning as expected.

How To Test

Instructions for the reviewer on how to test your changes.

Notes To Reviewer

Any notes you would like to include for the reviewer.

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/retest

3 similar comments
@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Sep 13, 2025

/retest

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/retest

@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Oct 14, 2025

/retest

@thepetk thepetk force-pushed the feat/deprecate_go_stacks branch from 08959a0 to ae703d8 Compare October 15, 2025 13:47
@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Oct 15, 2025

@michael-valdron I've included my updates for the validate-samples workflow fix.

The action is currently failing for all PRs as we have a problem with the convertKubernetesContentInUri variable.

More specifically, after the #624 was merged, this check is now able to fetch correctly the paths, so it's able to recognize the related sample and tries to verify its schema.

Now as we haven't set convertKubernetesContentInUri := false the parser.ParserAgs tries to find kubernetes resrouces too, while they don't exist in the .zip file we are wroking with.

That said I'm adding this flag just to make it ignore looking for files like deploy.yaml and focus only on schema validation.

@thepetk thepetk force-pushed the feat/deprecate_go_stacks branch from ae703d8 to 0461f1e Compare October 15, 2025 14:03
@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Oct 15, 2025

Rebased to latest main

@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Oct 16, 2025

/retest

Copy link
Member

@michael-valdron michael-valdron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @thepetk, apologies for missing your PR here, if you can rebase it when you can I'll give a re-review.

@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Feb 4, 2026

lol @michael-valdron I have forgotten about it too :D Thanks for bringing it up again

Signed-off-by: thepetk <thepetk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: thepetk <thepetk@gmail.com>
@thepetk thepetk force-pushed the feat/deprecate_go_stacks branch from 0461f1e to 58c94fe Compare February 4, 2026 19:30
@thepetk
Copy link
Contributor Author

thepetk commented Feb 4, 2026

@michael-valdron rebased

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@thepetk: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v4.16-registry-test 58c94fe link true /test v4.16-registry-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Looks good to me label Feb 6, 2026
Copy link
Member

@michael-valdron michael-valdron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed integration tests I ran ✔️

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: michael-valdron, thepetk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [michael-valdron,thepetk]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@michael-valdron michael-valdron merged commit 04ddb00 into devfile:main Feb 6, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved lgtm Looks good to me

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants