-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
[dylink] Fix deadlock in _emscripten_dlsync_threads()
#27000
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
227c45c
Add reproducer
kleisauke 31ea327
[dylink] Fix deadlock in `_emscripten_dlsync_threads()`
kleisauke d7be9f4
Automatic rebaseline of codesize expectations. NFC
kleisauke 178727a
Improve comment
kleisauke f7e8ed7
Improve test
kleisauke 2a44056
Inline bool
kleisauke 6c04ce3
Appease ruff
kleisauke e8d8f99
Merge branch 'main' into issue-26913-fix
kleisauke 7ef1966
Merge branch 'main' into issue-26913-fix
kleisauke a5e67bb
Automatic rebaseline of codesize expectations. NFC
kleisauke 146131d
Merge branch 'main' into issue-26913-fix
kleisauke c9348e2
Automatic rebaseline of codesize expectations. NFC
kleisauke 4ef62da
Incorporate feedback
kleisauke 4d7842b
Automatic rebaseline of codesize expectations. NFC
kleisauke f7a6244
Style
kleisauke e178d8e
Move `_dlopen_proxying_queue` back to `dynlink.c`
kleisauke 8ff1b95
Re-add `_Atomic`
kleisauke 1335f8b
Reduce diff
kleisauke 8ff5af8
Merge branch 'main' into issue-26913-fix
kleisauke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we leave the declaration of this queue here in this file? (and declare a getter for it?)
In fact, could we just declare the queue itself as extern in proxying.c (avoiding the getting completely).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revised this to use an
externdeclaration with commit 4ef62da.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, this seems to regress code size, see e.g. commit 4d7842b.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean moving back to this file causes a regression? I think co-locating it here does make the most sense unless its a big regression, which would seem very odd.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Never mind, the code size expectations for the main branch need to be rebaselined.
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/actions/runs/26584327538/job/78325943846?pr=27000