Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 8: Workflow does not contain permissions#578
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 8: Workflow does not contain permissions#578
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Slashgear
temporarily deployed
to
preview-pr-578
GitHub Actions
Inactive
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/lyonjs/lyonjs.github.com/security/code-scanning/8
In general, the fix is to explicitly declare a
permissionsblock that grants only the minimal required scopes for theGITHUB_TOKEN, either at the workflow root or per job. Since only thedockerjob needspackages: writeand already declares its own permissions, the safest approach is to define a read-only default at the workflow level (contents: read), which will apply toformat,nextjs,deploy-production, anddeploy-preview, while leaving thedockerjob’s explicit permissions intact.Concretely, in
.github/workflows/integration.yml, add a top-levelpermissions:block right after thename:line (beforeon:). Set it tocontents: read(and optionallypackages: readif you want symmetry with the example, but it’s not necessary unless used). Because job-level permissions override workflow-level ones, the existingpermissionsblock in thedockerjob will continue to grantpackages: writeonly where needed. No imports or additional methods are required; this is a pure YAML configuration change.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.