Add MCP Observatory CI check#4392
Open
KryptosAI wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a lightweight MCP Observatory check for the reference
server-everythingMCP server.\n\nWhy it helps:\n\n- verifies MCP tools, prompts, and resources still respond correctly\n- catches schema drift and common security footguns before release\n- posts a readable PR report for maintainers\n- gives users a compatibility signal when evaluating MCP servers\n\nI validated the target locally with:\n\nbash\nnpx @kryptosai/mcp-observatory@latest test --target mcp-observatory.target.json --security --deep\n\n\nResult: passed, with 13 tools, 4 prompts, and 7 resources detected fromnpx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything@latest.\n\nIt runs in GitHub Actions and does not require an MCP Observatory account. If this is too broad for the repo, I can scope it differently or adjust the workflow.