Skip to content

feat: add @validex/nuxt module#1446

Open
chiptoma wants to merge 2 commits intonuxt:mainfrom
chiptoma:chiptoma-patch-1
Open

feat: add @validex/nuxt module#1446
chiptoma wants to merge 2 commits intonuxt:mainfrom
chiptoma:chiptoma-patch-1

Conversation

@chiptoma
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Linked issue

N/A — new module submission.

📚 Description

Adding @validex/nuxt to the modules directory. It provides 25 typed validation rules built on Zod 4, with auto-imported composables (useValidation + all rule factories), config via nuxt.config.ts, structured error codes, and i18n support.

@chiptoma chiptoma changed the title Add @validex/nuxt module feat: add @validex/nuxt module Apr 13, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ad826c08-34cc-42f6-b701-0477c02fb67c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f602ef8 and d033186.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/validex.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • modules/validex.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new Nuxt module manifest was added at modules/validex.yml for the validex package. The YAML declares package metadata: name, description, repo, npm (@validex/nuxt), github, website, category, type, maintainer (Ciprian Toma), and Nuxt compatibility (nuxt: >=3.0.0) with an empty requires object.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: add @validex/nuxt module' accurately reflects the main change—adding a new Nuxt module manifest to the modules directory.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, providing context about the @validex/nuxt module, its features, and relevant links.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@modules/validex.yml`:
- Around line 13-14: Add an explicit empty requires mapping under the existing
compatibility key so the manifest matches Nuxt module shape: update the
compatibility block to include a requires field (e.g., requires: {}) next to
nuxt: '>=3.0.0' so the manifest contains compatibility.requires as expected.
- Around line 1-14: Add the missing top-level manifest key "learn_more" to the
module manifest (modules/validex.yml): insert learn_more: '' as a sibling to
name/description/repo so the manifest conforms to the schema (an empty string is
acceptable if there's no extra documentation yet).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: afc0767c-f53e-40d5-91ba-029523b7b93a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da52820 and f602ef8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/validex.yml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant