[codex] Test duplicate active process handles#28133
Draft
Conversation
dec0c76 to
f6bef94
Compare
731d18e to
7a16219
Compare
f6bef94 to
0151b45
Compare
7a16219 to
4656232
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Protect the documented app-server invariant that a connection cannot replace an active
processHandle.Reuse the deterministic probe/release fixture, reject a duplicate spawn with the exact protocol error, then release and verify the original process exits with its intact output.
The focused test, full
process_execintegration module, andjust fix -p codex-app-serverpass.