-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
[mypyc] Do not preemptively diff & union op level dataflow sets #20897
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+49
−30
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3aed3b2
Fix: Do not preemptively diff & union op level dataflow sets
VaggelisD e90a04d
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 0bb52f6
Do the same for block-level dataflow too
VaggelisD 9e0bfc9
Do not copy for block-level dataflow, cache empty set creation
VaggelisD 3492914
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 6208e4f
Fix CI from EMPTY
VaggelisD 5b6c1ac
Use frozenset for EMPTY
VaggelisD 4ce4c07
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 43799d3
Merge branch 'master' into dataflow_cur
hauntsaninja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could even cache the visitor result per op so we don't have to
accept()twice, here and in L632, right? Not sure how worth it it is though, the visitor work is not that intensive.