Skip to content

fix(dist/manifestation): use full toolchain name in Update::unavailable_components()#4767

Merged
rami3l merged 3 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
rami3l:fix/unavailable-component-full-toolchain-name
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

fix(dist/manifestation): use full toolchain name in Update::unavailable_components()#4767
rami3l merged 3 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
rami3l:fix/unavailable-component-full-toolchain-name

Conversation

@rami3l
Copy link
Member

@rami3l rami3l commented Mar 22, 2026

Closes #4765.

@rami3l rami3l force-pushed the fix/unavailable-component-full-toolchain-name branch 3 times, most recently from a38dba2 to 5902988 Compare March 22, 2026 10:31
@rami3l rami3l force-pushed the fix/unavailable-component-full-toolchain-name branch from 5902988 to bb5e6d7 Compare March 22, 2026 11:04
@rami3l rami3l marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2026 12:16
@rami3l rami3l added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:main with commit dfc31fe Mar 23, 2026
29 checks passed
@rami3l rami3l deleted the fix/unavailable-component-full-toolchain-name branch March 23, 2026 09:20
@djc
Copy link
Contributor

djc commented Mar 23, 2026

Remind me why we need protoc in CI?

@rami3l
Copy link
Member Author

rami3l commented Mar 23, 2026

Remind me why we need protoc in CI?

@djc It's an implicit dependency of the OTEL feature. Usually we don't need it and that's why it's only present in the all-features check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading deprecated component message for non-host toolchain

3 participants