fix(v2): Vite 8 compatible manifest plugin

[birkskyum]

Moving to vite 8 w/ rolldown removes an entire category of dev/prod differences with vite 7 having esbuild (dev) + rollup (prod).

Towards

• [Feature]: Vite 8 / Rolldown Compatibility #2075

This PR contains:

• Vite 8 & Rolldown Support: Updated the solid-start:manifest-plugin to correctly resolve the client manifest during SSR builds under Vite 8 / Rolldown. It automatically detects the current major Vite version, and then:
  • For Vite 7: Continues to extract the .vite/manifest.json directly from the globalThis.START_CLIENT_BUNDLE memory footprint like before.
  • For Vite 8+: Falls back to reading the fully generated .solid-start/client/.vite/manifest.json from the filesystem, solving undefined 'source' TypeErrors caused by changes to Rolldown's generateBundle asset handling.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 65448a9

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[netlify]

❌ Deploy Preview for solid-start-landing-page failed. Why did it fail? →

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	65448a9
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/solid-start-landing-page/deploys/69c8078e429d0900089e5f72

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/solidjs/solid-start/@solidjs/start@2080

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/solidjs/solid-start/@solidjs/vite-plugin-nitro-2@2080

commit: 65448a9

[huseeiin]

when still using vite 7 and this pr, size gets larger 😢

@solidjs/start@alpha: 103.4 kb
pr: 115.5 kb

[birkskyum]

when still using vite 7 and this pr, size gets larger 😢

@solidjs/start@alpha: 103.4 kb
pr: 115.5 kb

Ugh, that are some rough numbers - considering build size is a key selling point of SolidStart.

I have an open ticket on vite 8 already regarding solid jsx dependency scanning - so it would be good if someone else could champion the build size related issues.

[birkskyum]

I think that maybe the increase in build size didn't come from this PR, but rather from:

• feat(2.0): seroval json mode #2042