README update 2

[robbycochran]

Description

A detailed explanation of the changes in your PR.

Feel free to remove this section if it is overkill for your PR, and the title of your PR is sufficiently descriptive.

Checklist

• Investigated and inspected CI test results
• Updated documentation accordingly

Automated testing

• Added unit tests
• Added integration tests
• Added regression tests

If any of these don't apply, please comment below.

Testing Performed

TODO(replace-me)
Use this space to explain how you tested your PR, or, if you didn't test it, why you did not do so. (Valid reasons include "CI is sufficient" or "No testable changes")
In addition to reviewing your code, reviewers must also review your testing instructions, and make sure they are sufficient.

For more details, ref the Confluence page about this section.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Simplified and cleaned up introductory content in the README
  • Streamlined data collection method description for improved clarity

[robbycochran]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 69b4933a-a834-4c09-9f84-7cc2003b73a3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8c0181 and 9caee0e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md was simplified to remove introductory documentation text and condense the description of how data is gathered, changing from mentioning both kernel modules and eBPF probes to referencing only eBPF probes as the current collection method.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Updates README.md	Removed introductory text block and simplified data collection mechanism description by removing kernel modules reference, keeping only eBPF probes mention.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is a template with placeholder text ('TODO(replace-me)') and unchecked checkboxes; no actual implementation details, testing steps, or specific documentation changes are provided.	Fill in the description with actual details about changes, complete the checklist items, provide testing performed information, and explain why documentation updates were made.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'README update 2' is vague and generic; it does not clearly convey what was actually changed in the README or the specific purpose of the update.	Replace with a more descriptive title like 'Simplify README documentation on data collection methods' to clearly indicate the main change.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch rc-pr-test-2

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.38%. Comparing base (c8c0181) to head (9caee0e).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3154   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.38%   27.38%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        5427     5427           
  Branches     2548     2548           
=======================================
  Hits         1486     1486           
  Misses       3214     3214           
  Partials      727      727           

Flag	Coverage Δ
collector-unit-tests	27.38% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.