ssrn-manuscript:0.1.0

[statzhero]

Thank you for your work. I tried my best to follow all guidelines.
I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description: A Typst template for working papers in the social sciences, especially economics, finance, and accounting.

Main features:

• Clean, visual style
• Many options to customize (and open to suggestions)
• Endfloat mode for conference submissions
• Anonymized title page for blind review
• No external dependencies

There are similar templates but they do not have these features and some of them are broken after the latest Typst release.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does

• added a typst.toml file with all required keys

• added a README.md with documentation for my package

• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md

• tested my package locally on my system and it worked

• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

• ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

[saecki]

Thanks for this package!

[saecki]

This image seems to be missing.

[statzhero]

Will add back. I assumed only the main thumbnail can be included.

[saecki]

This one as well

[statzhero]

Will add back.

[saecki]

What does ssrn stand for in this context? Because SSRN also seems to be a research platform for social sciences: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Science_Research_Network
In that case, if this isn't an official package, could you pick another name? It should be distinctive enough so that another package with the same purpose can be published without one of the two having an unfair advantage, and it should be clear from the name that it is community-built and not officially endorsed by the university. See our naming rules.

If you want to make this an official template, to keep the current name, that's also an option. In that case a staff member of the organization should send an email to hello@typst.app stating that they officially endorse your package. In practice it means that they will accept submission of works built using it, and ideally promote it and guarantee that it will be maintained in the long term.

[statzhero]

I'm happy to rename it. you should be aware that there is already a package that uses the shortcut, so I would encourage a consistent naming enforcement.

[saecki]

I'm happy to rename it.

That would be appreciated.

you should be aware that there is already a package that uses the shortcut, so I would encourage a consistent naming enforcement.

At the time this package was published, the naming guidelines were different from what they are now. The is review process is also on a best effort basis, and sometimes don't catch everything. That is no reason to stop trying though :)

[statzhero]

When I resubmit, may I reassign you as reviewer?

[saecki]

Sure, you can also update this existing PR if you feel comfortable with git.

[statzhero]

I plan to close this PR and open a new one. My proposed name is econ-working-paper.

[saecki]

That works 👍