Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 28, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
coverage 7.13.0 -> 7.13.1 age confidence

Release Notes

coveragepy/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.13.1

Compare Source

  • Added: the JSON report now includes a "start_line" key for function and
    class regions, indicating the first line of the region in the source. Closes
    issue 2110_.

  • Added: The debug data command now takes file names as arguments on the
    command line, so you can inspect specific data files without needing to set
    the COVERAGE_FILE environment variable.

  • Fix: the JSON report used to report module docstrings as executed lines,
    which no other report did, as described in issue 2105_. This is now fixed,
    thanks to Jianrong Zhao.

  • Fix: coverage.py uses a more disciplined approach to detecting where
    third-party code is installed, and avoids measuring it. This shouldn't change
    any behavior. If you find that it does, please get in touch.

  • Performance: data files that will be combined now record their hash as part
    of the file name. This lets us skip duplicate data more quickly, speeding the
    combining step.

  • Docs: added a section explaining more about what is considered a missing
    branch and how it is reported: :ref:branch_explain, as requested in issue 1597. Thanks to Ayisha Mohammed <pull 2092_>.

  • Tests: the test suite misunderstood what core was being tested if
    COVERAGE_CORE wasn't set on 3.14+. This is now fixed, closing issue 2109_.

.. _issue 1597: #​1597
.. _pull 2092: #​2092
.. _issue 2105: #​2105
.. _issue 2109: #​2109
.. _issue 2110: #​2110

.. _changes_7-13-0:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Dec 28, 2025

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6e64563) 581 581 100.00%
Head commit (245d107) 581 (+0) 581 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#635) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6e64563) to head (245d107).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #635   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          581       581           
  Branches        41        41           
=========================================
  Hits           581       581           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant