fix mut slots #7240

Performance Regression: -21.7%

⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1111 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1530 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`varbinview_zip_block_mask`	2.9 ms	3.8 ms	-21.7%
❌	Simulation	`varbinview_zip_fragmented_mask`	6 ms	7 ms	-14.52%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	248.6 µs	189.4 µs	+31.27%
⚡	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f32, 32768]`	272.3 µs	243.7 µs	+11.73%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 16384]`	183.9 µs	161.5 µs	+13.85%
⚡	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	227.8 µs	205.3 µs	+10.96%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 16384]`	221.2 µs	182.4 µs	+21.28%
⚡	Simulation	`old_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 32768]`	332.7 µs	285.6 µs	+16.49%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i32, 32768]`	255.7 µs	224 µs	+14.14%
⚡	Simulation	`new_alp_prim_test_between[f64, 16384]`	146 µs	123.9 µs	+17.83%
⚡	Simulation	`old_bp_prim_test_between[i64, 32768]`	329 µs	265.2 µs	+24.07%

_{Comparing ji/mut-slots (30236c0) with develop (38ab5af)}

1530 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩